placestats

Harding County, SD

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population1092
Density0.2people per km² of land
Median household income$74,766
Land area6919km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Harding County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Eureka County, NV, Nome Census Area, AK, Aleutians East Borough, AK, Bethel Census Area, AK, Southeast Fairbanks Census Area, AK, Dillingham Census Area, AK, Lincoln County, NV, McCone County, MT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Harding Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Median gross rent$4782nd pct by value1st pct by value -2.0 sd
Returns reporting capital gains46.6%100th pct by value100th pct by value +1.9 sd
Dental visit in the past year73.5%100th pct99th pct +1.8 sd
Net business formation rate-15.82nd pct by value0th pct by value -1.8 sd
Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.688100th pct100th pct +1.8 sd
Per capita income$48,97498th pct94th pct +1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.688100100+1.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance7.9%8684-1.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work8,715 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.6%193+0.8County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.4%7078-0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability25.8%9091-1.0CDC PLACES
Arthritis21%9292-1.3CDC PLACES
Binge drinking21.1%4012+0.4CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate15.888·99·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments35———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate028·2·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.7%43+1.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents26.592·89·+1.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.6%7672-0.7Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort375———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income375———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.2%9073+1.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease4.9%9693-1.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability12.9%8492-1.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening59.3%9265+1.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people76.386·99·+1.1
Coronary heart disease5%8689-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.8%7085-0.7CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking13.5%8081-0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year73.5%10099+1.8CDC PLACES
Depression21.2%4880-0.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.5%7491-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.0994·94·+1.0
Economy score1.1660·69·-0.0
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.93364·58·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed790———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents13.854·35·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health13.8%9496-1.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.95696-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.26%519+0.1County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress15.4%8294-1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress10.5%9897-1.2CDC PLACES
Friending clustering0.12651·72·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4492647+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$66,410k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.39232·28·-0.2
Hearing disability6.5%8467-0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure27.6%9294-1.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.3%8094-0.9CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate77.1%71·66·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing units702———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability6.4%9295-1.0CDC PLACES
Labour force803———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents20.184·92·+1.0
Mammography in the past two years76.7%8878+1.1CDC PLACES
Mean adjusted gross income per return$83,1958779+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work17 min4891+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age48.9 years74·91·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$4782·1·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$156,40038·41·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$74,766—78—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$59,2552239-0.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,46067·47·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0779%2457-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0625-0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability9.3%9696-1.1CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99862·87·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-15.82·0·-1.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity19.8%9092-1.0CDC PLACES
Obesity35.1%5075+0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units493———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents088·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents050·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units380———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return1,210———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return286·93·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move1,094———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$48,9749894+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$50,4901636-0.9BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$66,344k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,314———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,324———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over909———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over1,009———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over817———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over219———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line160———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,081———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,322———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago1,040———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain248———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census1,311———
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain12.1%4861-0.2Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000731———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004815———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008722———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012739———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016770———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020813———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024820———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Private job growth-5.8812·3·-0.9BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs320———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0087834-1.2Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents60.478·76·+0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20009197·100·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200488.284·100·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20088168·96·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201288.678·99·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201694.884·100·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202093.984·100·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20249481·100·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20242.9819·29·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%64·5·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit3.45%36·1·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains46.6%100·100·+1.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%64·9·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.5%90·33·+1.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.6%9495-1.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.1%37·54·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%78·14·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain7.37%18·3·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago95.2%90·99·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain24%55·20·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married64.5%74·98·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain6.87%50·95·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic87.4%62·64·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher30.4%8178+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours29.4%9498-1.4CDC PLACES
Stroke2.6%8490-0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication55.4%56·17·+0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed580———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,569———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population1,092———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed13———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate1.6%9099-1.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate29.8%59·89·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units209———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.5%9495-0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50151———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute512———Census ACS 5-year

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.