placestats

Kemper County, MS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8855
Density4.5people per km² of land
Median household income$43,595
Land area1984km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Kemper County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Monroe County, AR, Oregon County, MO, McKinley County, NM, Ozark County, MO, Wilcox County, AL, Choctaw County, AL, Wayne County, MO, Carter County, MO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Kemper Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Incarceration rate6,540100th pct by value100th pct by value +6.7 sd
Dental visit in the past year7.7%2nd pct1st pct -4.5 sd
Mainline Protestant adherents17.6100th pct by value89th pct by value +3.5 sd
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-3.790th pct by value13th pct by value -2.5 sd
Injury deaths64.1100th pct91st pct -2.4 sd
Depression18.2%100th pct96th pct -2.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3652015-0.9Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance13.2%4526-0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work103,740 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.4%8831-1.2CDC PLACES
Any disability39.6%639-0.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.0830·33·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis27.3%5915-0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.66262-1.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking13.1%9297-1.4CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain122—99·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents1.1138·65·-0.6
Black-white residential segregation12.510·2·-1.5County Health Rankings
Business closing rate12.692·95·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments86———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.370·66·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5.7%9294-1.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents026·6·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain35.9%244+0.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.59%98·99·+2.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,030———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,030———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.7%10080+1.9CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8%9024-1.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability19.4%8017-1.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.4%5223+0.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people54.578·96·+0.9
Coronary heart disease6.8%7114-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.6%8051-0.8CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking19.3%7818-0.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year7.7%21-4.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.3226·39·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Depression18.2%10096-2.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes15.8%184+0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.2263·9·+0.4
Economic connectedness0.562188-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.5576·2·-1.8
Education score0.59691·79·+1.4
Effective property tax rate0.59858·26·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,030———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents19.916·51·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health27.1%479-0.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.81016+1.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.29%3013-0.7County Health Rankings
Food insecurity29.7%164+0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.7%9846-1.8CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.9%9628-1.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02925176-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.16696·98·+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.483219+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$354,770k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.6178·18·+0.8
Hearing disability7%9044-1.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure46%41+1.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.9%4923-0.1CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.975%10099+1.7County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate77.6%72·69·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity23%164+1.0CDC PLACES
Housing units3,937———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.0255548-0.3Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate6,540100·100·+6.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-7,6842·10·-1.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability11.5%7111-0.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain64.110091-2.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate4,54981·83·+0.2
Jail population rate5,65395·99·+1.8
Labour force3,165———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation15.6%124+0.9CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support33.8%02+1.7CDC PLACES
Life expectancy75.7 years9655+1.8County Health Rankings
Loneliness39.4%145+1.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents17.6100·89·+3.5
Mammography in the past two years74.8%8662+1.1CDC PLACES
Material security score-1.5618·4·-0.8
Mean adjusted gross income per return$43,07801-1.9IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$35,1342·2·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$42,81862·16·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work32.1 min189+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age40.7 years20·42·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$90,20028·5·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$43,595—8—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$42,461223-0.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill53935·6·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0453%3214-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations12.76666+0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability19%335+0.3CDC PLACES
Mobility score-0.4536·31·-0.3
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain30.16714-0.5County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share194·97·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.324·10·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.23840·30·-0.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity36.6%225+0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity45.6%83+1.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,209———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents026·11·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units2,489———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,680———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return28·23·-1.8IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,889———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$22,63785-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$39,32183-1.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$338,940k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,620———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,584———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,513———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,073———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,991———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,894———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,978———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,009———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,026———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,757———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,789———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain1,064———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,988———
Poverty rate24.6%308+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)25.9%204+0.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5768229-0.9County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,261———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,589———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,209———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,052———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,639———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,731———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,086———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population6.8%3·4·-1.8
Preventable hospital stays3,4204624-0.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate88663·74·+0.1
Private job growth1.6552·50·-0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,107———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01292019-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps19.1%33·83·-0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents38.620·29·-0.8
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200045.320·12·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200446.212·12·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200837.38·8·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201235.68·6·-1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201638.68·7·-1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202038.26·7·-2.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202441.56·8·-2.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-3.790·13·-2.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.18%52·27·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit34.1%94·98·+1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains5.99%6·3·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.18%60·61·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year81.1%100·99·+1.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability6%185+0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.4%46·66·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic3.53%68·85·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic60.4%97·98·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced9.13%4·13·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88%36·48·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married42%94·94·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married43.2%20·12·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women uncertain65.1%—89·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic33.4%6·6·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain5.66%2·23·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain17.8%9028+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours40.3%7024-0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.96618·6·-1.0
Stroke4.6%123+0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication67%100·99·+2.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,670———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken11,390———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off15.9%265+0.5CDC PLACES
Total population8,855———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.04259498+1.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed135———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.3%4421+0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate18.5%18·65·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units728———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability8%257+0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,907———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain232———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,227———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost10,4389845-1.4County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.