placestats

Johnson County, IL

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population13,350
Density15.0people per km² of land
Median household income$65,203
Land area890km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Johnson County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Waushara County, WI, Erath County, TX, Latah County, ID, De Witt County, IL, Moniteau County, MO, Codington County, SD, Bureau County, IL, Marquette County, MI. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Johnson Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic6.97%100th pct by value95th pct by value +3.1 sd
Mammography in the past two years64.4%0th pct3rd pct -2.9 sd
Share now married42%0th pct by value10th pct by value -2.9 sd
Unemployment rate5.6%4th pct7th pct +2.4 sd
Colorectal cancer screening51.6%2nd pct9th pct -2.4 sd
Median gross rent$6340th pct by value8th pct by value -2.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.422250-0.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.7%3346-0.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work116,200 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.333%4232+0.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.3%2431+0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability32%4448+0.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.2436·36·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.3%3851+0.0CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.05383952-0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking19.9%3320+0.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents2.2588·76·+0.9
Black-white residential segregation54.644·61·+0.2County Health Rankings
Business closing rate8.9768·60·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments158———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened18———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate11.578·81·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7%6460-0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents1.1812·15·-1.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain16.5%4457+0.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.203%57·37·+0.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,203———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,203———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.9%5650+0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.7%1330+1.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.7%5358-0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening51.6%29-2.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people22.560·53·+0.1
Coronary heart disease6.3%730+1.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.3%6965-0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.4%2434+0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.8%3449-0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.1532·34·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Depression22%8970-1.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.3%2939+0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.028438·47·-0.4
Economic connectedness0.8484860-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7823442-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.4296·28·-1.6
Education score0.019844·44·-0.2
Effective property tax rate1.3270·80·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,096———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents21.864·55·+0.0
Fair or poor self-rated health21.6%3137+0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.71019+0.8County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.41%4049-0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity18.5%2132+1.1CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.5%5350-0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.8%4447+0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.01910095-2.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12568·71·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.426678-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$310,890k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.16824·41·-0.7
Hearing disability6.9%3648-0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure35%1632+1.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.1%3851+0.4CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.899%5553+0.2County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate84.7%98·96·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity15.2%1228+1.3CDC PLACES
Housing units5,538———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate76935·31·-0.6
Income gap between arrivals and departures$6,48270·68·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.1%3142+0.5CDC PLACES
Injury deaths82.76071-0.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,89832·45·-0.4
Jail population rate46357·57·-0.0
Labour force4,341———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.8%1834+1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support28.2%013+1.9CDC PLACES
Life expectancy75.8 years4056-0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness35.4%2131+0.7CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents3.110·20·-1.0
Mammography in the past two years64.4%03-2.9CDC PLACES
Material security score0.14618·44·-1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$67,8344448-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$57,25358·57·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$50,77144·44·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work27.1 min3030+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.7 years54·61·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$6340·8·-2.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$148,20024·37·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$65,203—56—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$63,1602851-0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,95244·66·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0923%7274+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations8.221227-1.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.7%3144+0.5CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99552·56·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.5670·77·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.081342·44·-0.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.4%5659-0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity41.9%915+1.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,133———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents086·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0222·17·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units3,499———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return9,600———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return262·51·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move8,615———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$28,028420-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$42,12648-1.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$562,590k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,355———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,326———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over11,381———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over11,121———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over9,690———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,725———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,903———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,650———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,418———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,855———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago11,140———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,823———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census13,308———
Poverty rate16.7%431+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)15.2%1237+1.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4434259-0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20005,362———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,865———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,901———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,672———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,089———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,437———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20246,103———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population81.8%80·77·+0.8
Preventable hospital stays3,2712229+0.7County Health Rankings
Prison population rate3065·16·-1.0
Private job growth1.1550·41·-0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,146———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01894657-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps18.1%100·80·+1.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents28.48·9·-1.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20006368·64·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200468.876·73·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200867.680·74·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201271.676·75·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201680.382·80·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202079.878·79·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202479.576·73·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.470·76·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.39%40·33·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.9%52·41·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains15.1%36·49·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.98%68·74·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.3%69·49·+0.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.1%2034+1.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.4%56·58·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic7.54%84·63·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced15.6%94·93·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.25%54·40·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago83.4%16·12·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%88·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married35.9%90·84·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married42%0·10·-2.9Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic6.97%100·95·+3.1Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.05%32·16·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic81%30·50·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.48%28·40·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.8%4434-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours38.8%3037+0.6CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.36710·27·-1.3
Stroke3.4%1330+1.2CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.2%62·48·+0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,030———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken16,362———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off10%1235+1.3CDC PLACES
Total population13,350———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01483226-0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed245———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate5.6%47+2.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate25.4%88·83·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,405———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.3%2941+0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,158———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,289———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost9,5913655+0.3County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.