placestats

Hodgeman County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population1676
Density0.8people per km² of land
Median household income$63,125
Land area2227km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Hodgeman County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Towner County, ND, Johnson County, WY, McPherson County, SD, Sheridan County, MT, Kidder County, ND, Logan County, ND, Campbell County, SD, Gilliam County, OR. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Hodgeman Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Preventable hospital stays5,9162nd pct1st pct +2.5 sd
Business closing rate06th pct by value2nd pct by value -2.3 sd
Business opening rate010th pct by value2nd pct by value -1.9 sd
Effective property tax rate1.7796th pct by value95th pct by value +1.9 sd
Frequent physical distress11.1%96th pct93rd pct -1.8 sd
Self-care disability2.7%100th pct93rd pct -1.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.588298+1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.7%8072-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work12,275 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10.2%8285-1.0CDC PLACES
Any disability26.7%9487-1.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.2739·16·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.3%8880-1.3CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2588291+1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.3%6638-0.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents094·45·-0.2
Business closing rate06·2·-2.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments43———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate010·2·-1.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%5644-0.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents18.670·79·+0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain12.3%9479-1.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.119%5·4·-1.3County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort391———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income391———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.3%9658+1.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.4%9285-1.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.8%9283-1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.2%7446+0.7CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people5876·97·+0.7
Coronary heart disease5.1%9486-1.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.7%9687-1.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking13.6%8680-1.0CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year65%9282+1.0CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.5923·4·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression20.4%9687-1.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.8%7488-0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.9498·90·+1.6
Economic connectedness1.148396+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.2672·73·+0.5
Effective property tax rate1.7796·95·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed879———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents2.842·3·-0.8
Fair or poor self-rated health15.1%9692-1.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.32978-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.41%8849+1.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10.7%9093-1.1CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress16.4%8086-1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.1%9693-1.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.075995100-1.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11646·53·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3949295-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$181,420k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.19226·39·-0.3
Hearing disability6.4%9471-1.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30%6876-0.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.4%2461+0.7CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate81.1%80·86·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.1%7785-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units814———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-14,58313·3·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6.7%9892-1.7CDC PLACES
Labour force902———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.2%9495-1.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.4%8480-0.7CDC PLACES
Life expectancy72.1 years1219-1.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.1%6587-0.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents23.376·94·+0.7
Mammography in the past two years72%5636+0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score1.0798·94·+1.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$72,4586561+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$37,3617·4·-1.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$51,94446·48·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work15.6 min6994-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age45.9 years46·82·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$90079·60·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$92,70018·6·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$63,125—50—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$66,9197461+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,63869·54·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.145%8195+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations17.16088+0.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.5%9087-1.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99885·90·+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate040·35·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.67880·68·+0.7IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23.5%6074-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity36.4%4865+0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units666———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents046·11·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units540———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return1,560———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return268·65·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move1,475———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,8236866+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$75,0397289+0.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$126,140k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,681———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,655———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over1,349———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over1,265———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over1,155———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over351———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain99———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line169———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,638———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,625———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago1,563———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain328———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census1,723———
Poverty rate uncertain6.04%9697-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.4%8876-1.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain5761529+1.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,088———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,183———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,096———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,060———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,017———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,045———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024966———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays5,91621+2.5County Health Rankings
Private job growth-3.3212·7·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs320———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.04248597+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps5.6%0·1·-1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents44.738·43·-0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200079.472·95·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20048184·95·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200880.484·96·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201282.980·94·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201687.374·95·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20208564·92·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202485.766·91·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20246.3644·38·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%34·5·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit7.5%10·5·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains26.3%60·92·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%50·9·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.5%96·40·+1.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.7%10093-1.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.9%18·63·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain11.6%51·45·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain5.73%50·51·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago93.3%90·96·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.1%54·15·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married54.1%32·61·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%67·11·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic91.7%76·80·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain11.2%88·98·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain28.4%8474+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.9%2663+0.7CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.3480·98·+0.6
Stroke2.6%9690-1.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59%90·62·+1.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed800———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken2,682———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.2%7475-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population1,676———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed23———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%6086-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate18.2%28·64·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units148———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.6%9693-1.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50281———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute786———Census ACS 5-year

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.