placestats

Hickman County, KY

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4470
Density7.1people per km² of land
Median household income$63,750
Land area628km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Hickman County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Young County, TX, Franklin County, IA, Faribault County, MN, Scurry County, TX, Love County, OK, Cherokee County, IA, Taylor County, WI, Thurston County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Hickman Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Congregations per 10,000 people68.6100th pct by value99th pct by value +5.7 sd
Evangelical Protestant adherents87100th pct by value100th pct by value +4.8 sd
Black Protestant adherents7.798th pct by value93rd pct by value +4.1 sd
Religious adherents111100th pct by value99th pct by value +3.7 sd
Poverty rate20.8%0th pct15th pct +3.4 sd
Net business formation rate-9.522nd pct by value1st pct by value -2.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.386426-1.7Opportunity Atlas
Aggregate travel time to work37,090 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over19.5%1826+1.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.6170·63·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Average test score uncertain-0.05996551+0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Black Protestant adherents7.798·93·+4.1
Business closing rate14.398·98·+2.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments60———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate4.762·3·-1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Catholic adherents4.1620·33·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain27.2%415+2.3Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort590———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income590———Social Capital Atlas
Colorectal cancer screening60.5%9275+1.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people68.6100·99·+5.7
Dental visit in the past year56.1%2836-0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.274·64·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Economic connectedness0.8385057-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.5516·34·-0.9
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.81934·49·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,730———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents87100·100·+4.8
Fine particulate matter7.83344+0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.41%6249+0.3County Health Rankings
Friending bias0.05515057-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13178·81·+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4365661-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$261,060k———BEA Regional Accounts
Homeownership rate74.8%38·52·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing units2,160———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$5,56366·65·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Injury deaths uncertain132812+1.6County Health Rankings
Labour force1,807———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy71.5 years614-1.5County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.187—50·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$487k———Census local government finances
Mainline Protestant adherents12.356·79·-0.1
Mammography in the past two years71%3428-0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.3636·23·-2.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$60,4461026-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$44,2028·16·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$38,6390·6·-1.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work22.5 min5663-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.4 years86·84·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$71718·19·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$92,3000·6·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$63,750—51—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$56,3481030-1.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain7560·15·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0544%1624-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations11.33855-0.5County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99656·69·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-9.522·1·-2.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.40960·60·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Occupied housing units1,640———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.1130·21·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units1,226———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,520———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return262·70·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,177———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$30,5871633-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$56,5435657-0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$250,090k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,423———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,447———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,787———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,584———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,274———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,152———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line893———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line807———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,289———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,316———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,013———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain470———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,521———
Poverty rate20.8%015+3.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)18.7%619+1.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality6271220+1.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,124———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,342———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,250———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,139———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,157———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,199———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,069———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays5,39702+2.8County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,39489·94·+1.5
Private job growth5.0784·86·+1.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs663———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01874256-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents111100·99·+3.7
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20005532·37·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200460.152·46·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200863.462·63·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201267.664·65·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201678.762·75·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202078.964·76·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202480.864·77·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202425.796·94·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.23%30·29·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit20.7%90·75·+1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12.3%14·33·-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.12%16·26·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Share aged 65 and over25.8%90·89·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%0·14·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic9.22%86·67·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced15.6%90·94·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.42%23·18·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.8%80·71·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.9%36·27·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married49.3%16·32·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic85.9%56·61·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain10.1%100·95·+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain14.4%212-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours42.3%410+1.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.11718·42·-0.9
Tax returns filed1,790———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,508———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population4,470———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed77———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.3%2021+0.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain24.1%82·80·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain520———Census ACS 5-year
Women aged 15 to 50855———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,651———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain14,521211+1.5County Health Rankings

13of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.