placestats

Hamilton County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9438
Density6.7people per km² of land
Median household income$79,884
Land area1404km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Hamilton County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Morton County, ND, Guthrie County, IA, Davis County, IA, Eddy County, NM, Worth County, IA, Stanton County, NE, Butler County, NE, Nemaha County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Hamilton Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Business closing rate5.154th pct by value5th pct by value -1.9 sd
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over7%96th pct97th pct -1.8 sd
Stroke2.5%96th pct94th pct -1.6 sd
Material security score1.3496th pct by value98th pct by value +1.6 sd
Gini index of income inequality0.3894th pct98th pct -1.6 sd
Mainline Protestant adherents30.490th pct by value97th pct by value +1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5266492+0.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance7.9%7884-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work88,660 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over7%9697-1.8CDC PLACES
Any disability25.9%8291-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.454·40·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.3%4280-0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2358689+1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.7%144+0.9CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain49.18·31·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents082·45·-0.4
Business closing rate5.154·5·-1.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments295———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened22———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.5530·21·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%2419+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents8.8630·52·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain9%7892-0.9Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,164———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,164———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.6%6845+0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.1%9090-1.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability11.9%9697-1.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.7%2634-0.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people29.780·71·+0.8
Coronary heart disease5.1%7886-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.3%8294-1.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking12.9%8285-1.0CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year67%7489+0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.078·9·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Depression18%8897-1.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.3%9094-1.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.1294·94·+1.2
Economic connectedness1.098093+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.068286+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.7184·88·+0.9
Education score0.93385·93·+1.1
Effective property tax rate0.95830·60·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,163———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents20.370·52·+0.4
Fair or poor self-rated health13.6%9897-1.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.27679-0.6County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.54%8691+1.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10.2%8995-0.9CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress14.8%9097-1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress10.6%9897-1.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02356879-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10630·32·-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.389498-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$931,510k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.7290·91·+1.1
Hearing disability6.4%7871-0.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.7%7288-0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.2%6686-0.5CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.939%7283+0.7County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate83%94·93·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity8.4%9298-1.0CDC PLACES
Housing units4,122———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate40219·7·-0.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$18,90990·92·+1.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6.3%9696-1.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain62.28693-1.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,17412·18·-0.7
Jail population rate14020·7·-0.5
Labour force5,260———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation5.9%9297-1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20%8995-1.1CDC PLACES
Life expectancy78.9 years6687+0.6County Health Rankings
Loneliness29.5%8697-1.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents30.490·97·+1.5
Mammography in the past two years73.4%3849-0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score1.3496·98·+1.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$94,1168489+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$79,65892·88·+1.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$60,74966·72·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20.9 min7073-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age41.3 years66·48·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$77626·33·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$238,70070·73·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$79,884—84—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$84,8059090+1.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,28758·74·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0631%3235-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations188090+0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10%8492-0.9CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.98834·28·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.474·75·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.3394·83·+1.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23%6277-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity40.8%623+1.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,499———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents2.5568·65·-0.2
Owner-occupied housing units2,903———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return9,380———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return278·86·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move8,548———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$37,4824469-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$74,7448689+0.6BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$712,160k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,528———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,537———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,546———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,226———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,444———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,934———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain624———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line701———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,278———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,473———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,519———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,906———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,429———
Poverty rate uncertain6.73%9295-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)7.4%9295-1.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3187090-0.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,491———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,866———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,799———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,871———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,004———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,533———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,547———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population50%29·31·-0.6
Preventable hospital stays2,5772657+0.4County Health Rankings
Prison population rate26240·11·-0.5
Private job growth4.4378·82·+0.7BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs3,232———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02959089+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps6.9%14·5·-0.9CDC PLACES
Religious adherents62.266·79·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200075.380·91·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200478.986·93·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200871.878·83·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201275.976·85·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201681.274·83·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202079.474·77·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202480.569·76·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20245.2331·35·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions4.77%82·74·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit8.68%12·9·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains25.8%90·91·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.08%26·25·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.1%70·37·+0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.6%9495-1.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.5%76·58·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain9.73%50·18·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.07%35·39·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.3%58·76·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.4%14·12·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married63.8%92·97·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.44%47·23·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.8%70·86·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain4.13%12·5·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher29.6%7877+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.7%3472+0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.1494·96·+1.2
Stroke2.5%9694-1.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59%92·62·+1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,610———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken13,341———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off5.8%8995-1.0CDC PLACES
Total population9,438———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01827581+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed97———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate1.8%8898-0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain15.1%82·51·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain623———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.5%9495-0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,874———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain92———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,251———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain6,0288292-0.8County Health Rankings

13of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.