placestats

Grant County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7284
Density4.9people per km² of land
Median household income—
Land area1489km²

No peer group: this county has no figure for density or median household income, so there is nothing to match it against. Only national percentiles are shown.

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.472—79—Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance18%—8—CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain93,615 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over14.7%—54—CDC PLACES
Any disability29.4%—67—CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.18—14·—IRS county migration flows
Arthritis20.1%—96—CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.388—10—Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.8%—45—CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain333—100·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents0—45·—
Business closing rate8.31—45·—Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments191———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.75—12·—Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6%—90—CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents30.3—92·—
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.7%—61—Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,065———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,065———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.8%—48—CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease4.9%—93—CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.7%—72—CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.5%—24—CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people29.9—72·—
Coronary heart disease5.1%—86—CDC PLACES
Current asthma9%—98—CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking12.9%—85—CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.9%—49—CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.25—65·—IRS county migration flows
Depression17.6%—98—CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.6%—52—CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.566—72·—
Economic connectedness0.717—29—Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.921—69—Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.995—60·—
Education score-0.898—7·—
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.31—80·—Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,830———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents22.7—58·—
Fair or poor self-rated health19.2%—56—CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.6—72—County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.32%—19—County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.7%—50—CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population1,676———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress15.2%—95—CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12%—82—CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.104—20—Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.125—70·—Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.418—80—Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$493,910k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.263—70·—
Hearing disability6.5%—67—CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29%—86—CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.6%—71—CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.825%—18—County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate74.8%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity14.7%—32—CDC PLACES
Housing units2,932———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,177—61·—
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-16,008—3·—IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6.9%—89—CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain52.7—97—County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,821—43·—
Jail population rate622—74·—
Labour force2,913———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.8%—67—CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.3%—43—CDC PLACES
Life expectancy77.8 years—78—County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.3%—72—CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents14.6—84·—
Mammography in the past two years71.4%—31—CDC PLACES
Material security score0.539—67·—
Mean adjusted gross income per return$68,191—49—IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$42,689—12·—IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$58,697—68·—IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work uncertain27.8 min—26—Census ACS 5-year
Median age32.9 years—4·—Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$696—16·—Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$146,200—36·—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$65,399—57—Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,911—64·—Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.104%—83—Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations18.1—90—County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12%—66—CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.998—87·—Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-1.56—14·—Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.07—3·—IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity28.8%—34—CDC PLACES
Obesity35.7%—71—CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,377———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0—78·—
Other religion adherents6.13—89·—
Owner-occupied housing units1,778———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,480———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return2—96·—IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,796———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$39,635—77—Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$56,354—57—BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$403,380k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,158———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,147———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,438———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,979———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,344———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over962———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line792———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,194———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,071———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,765———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain1,111———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,352———
Poverty rate (model-based)11.2%—69—Census SAIPE
Premature mortality417—66—County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,856———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,758———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,661———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,306———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,389———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,501———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,220———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population39.3%—19·—
Preventable hospital stays2,562—58—County Health Rankings
Prison population rate555—45·—
Private job growth4.06—79·—BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,974———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0232—76—Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7%—6·—CDC PLACES
Religious adherents73.7—91·—
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200075.7—91·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200479.5—93·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200875.9—91·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201279.9—91·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201680.4—81·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202078.9—76·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202481.9—81·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20246.26—38·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.95%—44·—IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit17.7%—63·—IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12.1%—32·—IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%—9·—IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.5%—25·—CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.2%—72—CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over13.2%—6·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain9.8%—19·—Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born23%—97·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race52.9%—94·—Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.9%—95·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%—83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married28.5%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share now married57.9%—83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic44.3%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain3.81%—3·—Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain25.6%—66—Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.4%—81—CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.604—84·—
Stroke2.6%—90—CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.6%—38·—CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,050———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken14,704———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.6%—54—CDC PLACES
Total population7,284———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.0267—10—Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed83———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.8%—76—BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain18.9%—66·—Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain555———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.9%—52—CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,359———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain453———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,365———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain7,300—81—County Health Rankings

14of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.