placestats

Terrell County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population851
Density0.1people per km² of land
Median household income$46,989
Land area6107km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Terrell County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Kusilvak Census Area, AK, Catron County, NM, Carter County, MT, Clark County, ID, Prairie County, MT, Harney County, OR, Culberson County, TX, Harding County, NM. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Terrell Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share widowed23.3%100th pct by value100th pct by value +5.4 sd
Mean income of departing households$83,800100th pct by value94th pct by value +3.0 sd
Arthritis18.9%100th pct99th pct -2.8 sd
Departures per 100 people staying9.59100th pct by value96th pct by value +2.6 sd
Cholesterol screening85.9%100th pct90th pct +2.5 sd
Republican swing, 2000 to 202424.598th pct by value92nd pct by value +2.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5145990+0.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance17.5%269+0.5CDC PLACES
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.308%6743-0.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over7.6%10096-1.3CDC PLACES
Any disability27%9485-1.3CDC PLACES
Arthritis18.9%10099-2.8CDC PLACES
Binge drinking19.2%4026+0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents094·45·-0.2
Business closing rate030·2·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate032·2·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5.8%8893-1.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents47.692·98·+2.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain21.5%5433-0.3Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort192———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening85.9%10090+2.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease3.9%10099-2.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13%9691-1.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.5%7024+0.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people78.990·99·+1.3
Coronary heart disease4.6%10096-1.7CDC PLACES
Current asthma8.7%9899-1.8CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking10%10097-1.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59.9%7055+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying9.59100·96·+2.6IRS county migration flows
Depression20.3%8487-1.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.4%4655-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.99696·91·+1.4
Economy score0.68256·42·+0.3
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.80356·48·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed346———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents53.696·95·+1.4
Fair or poor self-rated health17.6%7471-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.41576+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.21%395-0.3County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress15.5%9693-1.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.2%9692-1.5CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.4128085-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$69,807k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.65334·16·-0.2
Hearing disability5.7%10090-1.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.4%8082-0.8CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.7%2056+0.9CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate88.7%98·99·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing units663———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,97780·89·+0.3
Independent-living disability6.2%10096-1.5CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate1,74047·39·-0.3
Jail population rate68769·78·-0.1
Labour force359———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents014·1·-1.0
Mammography in the past two years75.7%9870+1.4CDC PLACES
Mean adjusted gross income per return$64,0176036+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of departing households$83,800100·94·+3.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work uncertain12.1 min9499-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age60.9 years98·100·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$152,20050·39·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$46,989—11—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$47,9473210-0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain1,22269·35·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0625-0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.7%9085-1.1CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate072·35·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity23.8%6472-0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity34.3%6479-0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units uncertain453———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents034·11·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units uncertain402———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return590———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return286·86·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move490———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$35,6037660+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$63,8286876+0.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$44,807k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population702———BEA Regional Accounts
Population687———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over uncertain752———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over556———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over uncertain705———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain316———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line128———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined uncertain851———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined688———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago uncertain845———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain228———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census760———
Poverty rate (model-based)18.6%2020+0.3Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000477———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004469———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008519———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012555———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016438———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020458———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024405———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population12.5%10·5·-1.3
Prison population rate1,28983·91·+0.7
Private job growth-2.9931·8·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs130———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Religious adherents10192·99·+1.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200052.66·29·-1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200465.823·64·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200863.525·64·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201266.121·60·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201667.321·43·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202073.721·61·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202477.127·66·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202424.598·92·+2.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%68·5·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit6.9%32·4·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains10.3%12·21·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%78·9·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.3%76·24·+0.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.8%9690-1.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over37.1%98·100·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%93·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain42.8%82·93·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago uncertain99.3%100·100·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain18.9%15·3·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52.1%42·49·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%80·11·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic0%—2·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic57.2%25·20·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain23.3%100·100·+5.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain32.3%9682+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37.3%2853+0.6CDC PLACES
Stroke2.4%10096-1.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.3%64·22·+0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed290———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken867———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population uncertain851———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed13———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.6%3443+0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate31.7%54·91·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain210———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.5%7464-0.7CDC PLACES
Workers aged 16 and over who commute uncertain306———Census ACS 5-year

22of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.