placestats

Choctaw County, MS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8172
Density7.5people per km² of land
Median household income$48,321
Land area1083km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Choctaw County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Texas County, MO, Clarke County, AL, Crenshaw County, AL, Clay County, AR, Montmorency County, MI, Barton County, MO, Hughes County, OK, Wilcox County, GA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Choctaw Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Education score2100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.7 sd
Share divorced7.92%0th pct by value5th pct by value -2.9 sd
Dental visit in the past year9%10th pct2nd pct -2.8 sd
Frequent physical distress14%98th pct43rd pct -2.5 sd
Jail population rate1,97698th pct by value98th pct by value +2.4 sd
Frequent mental distress18.2%100th pct57th pct -2.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4115843+0.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance12%6335-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work83,060 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over20.3%6423-0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability36.6%8522-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.2640·57·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.5%6324-0.4CDC PLACES
Binge drinking14.6%7790-0.8CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents2.3846·77·-0.3
Black-white residential segregation34.147·19·-0.1County Health Rankings
Business closing rate7.5634·29·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments122———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.690·89·+1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.7%6072-0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents024·6·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain27%5215-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.241%27·56·-0.7County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,986———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,986———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.1%9272+1.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.6%9832-1.8CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.3%9226-1.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55%4628-0.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people44.980·92·+0.8
Coronary heart disease6.2%9834-2.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.9%10082-1.7CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18%9428-1.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year9%102-2.8CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.7370·75·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Depression20.8%7984-1.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes12.9%5620-0.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.55596·26·+1.5
Economic connectedness0.6955125+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.020750·11·+0.1
Education score2100·100·+3.7
Effective property tax rate0.45219·10·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,944———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents49.876·93·+0.7
Fair or poor self-rated health22.9%9629-1.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.62921+0.7County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.34%4424-0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity21.7%6019-0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.2%10057-2.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14%9843-2.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.05963454+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13770·86·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4722424+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$859,540k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.45388·24·+1.0
Hearing disability7.2%7934-0.9CDC PLACES
High blood pressure40.2%319+0.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.2%4217+0.0CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.975%10099+1.3County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate80.3%82·83·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity16.6%6321-0.4CDC PLACES
Housing units4,363———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate2,73892·96·+1.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$8,26776·74·+0.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10%9627-2.0CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1352010+1.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,03133·50·-0.4
Jail population rate1,97698·98·+2.4
Labour force3,042———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation11.4%6519-0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support29%2010+0.7CDC PLACES
Life expectancy73.8 years9035+1.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness36.8%4018+0.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents7.7180·59·+0.4
Mammography in the past two years73.8%7252+0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.4568·20·+0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$52,703309-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$45,25748·19·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$36,9908·4·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.1 min4224+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age43 years60·64·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$66126·11·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$104,50026·11·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$48,321—14—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$50,5455615+0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill47214·4·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0494%3419-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations11.24854+0.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability16.1%9221-0.9CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain38.5155+1.0County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99986·93·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate5.0492·94·+1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.4722·23·-0.8IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity32.7%5815-0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity40.5%5826-0.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,450———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents022·11·-1.0
Owner-occupied housing units2,770———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,590———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return276·86·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,739———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$28,2826421+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$42,400408-0.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$342,260k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,072———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,088———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,730———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,352———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,742———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,868———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,276———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,355———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,028———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,924———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,692———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,067———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,246———
Poverty rate uncertain15.9%8835-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain17.1%8426-0.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5697830-0.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,719———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,908———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,105———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,273———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,065———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,223———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,890———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population9.88%7·4·-1.6
Preventable hospital stays3,0265438-0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate78139·67·-0.5
Private job growth3.9468·78·+0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,479———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01977462-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps12.5%8·48·-1.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents59.974·75·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200065.280·71·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200466.866·68·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200864.350·66·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201266.348·61·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201669.630·49·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202071.730·55·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202474.938·60·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20249.6812·51·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.47%54·34·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit28.1%84·92·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains8.02%26·9·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.54%48·42·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year78.9%85·90·+1.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.6%7920-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.9%72·77·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic29.3%65·87·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain7.92%0·5·-2.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.76%12·8·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago94.1%96·98·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.5%28·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.4%90·77·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain2.15%25·70·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic67%38·31·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed11.1%96·98·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.6%9033+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours38.1%9445-1.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.51140·20·-0.3
Stroke3.8%5815-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication64%88·95·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,240———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken14,746———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off10.8%8527-1.1CDC PLACES
Total population8,172———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.0565100100+2.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed98———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.2%8459-0.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate20.9%46·73·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units913———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability6.2%7923-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,600———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,951———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost11,8277831-0.7County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.