placestats

Sterling County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population1389
Density0.6people per km² of land
Median household income—
Land area2392km²

No peer group: this county has no figure for density or median household income, so there is nothing to match it against. Only national percentiles are shown.

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.441—65—Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance16%—13—CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain13,630 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.7%—76—CDC PLACES
Any disability27.1%—85—CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying7.01—69·—IRS county migration flows
Arthritis19.9%—97—CDC PLACES
Binge drinking20.2%—18—CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents0—45·—
Business closing rate15.6—99·—Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments37———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.79—24·—Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.3%—84—CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.2—60·—
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.6%—67—Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort243———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income243———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening85.5%—88—CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease4.4%—97—CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.7%—85—CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.2%—46—CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people51—95·—
Coronary heart disease4.5%—97—CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.3%—94—CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking11.2%—94—CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.3%—46—CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying10.2—97·—IRS county migration flows
Depression21.9%—71—CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.4%—76—CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1—91·—
Economic connectedness0.951—77—Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.79—90·—
Employed562———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents37.5—81·—
Fair or poor self-rated health17.1%—75—CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.5—74—County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.39%—40—County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population uncertain132———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress16.7%—83—CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.5%—89—CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.0051—92—Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.104—28·—Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.396—94—Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$299,510k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.305—72·—
Hearing disability5.6%—92—CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.7%—88—CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.7%—56—CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate83.3%—94·—Census ACS 5-year
Housing units508———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,034—51·—
Income gap between arrivals and departures$31,519—97·—IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6.5%—94—CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate4,900—85·—
Jail population rate352—40·—
Labour force583———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents23.3—94·—
Mammography in the past two years73.8%—52—CDC PLACES
Mean adjusted gross income per return$122,970—97—IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$89,630—92·—IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$58,111—66·—IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work27.1 min—30—Census ACS 5-year
Median age31.4 years—2·—Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$968—69·—Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$143,200—34·—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$80,859—86—Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain1,535—50·—Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0817%—62—Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations21.2—95—County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.6%—86—CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.992—43·—Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-7.79—2·—Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-3.17—1·—IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23.2%—76—CDC PLACES
Obesity33.2%—84—CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units402———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0—78·—
Other religion adherents0.51—24·—
Owner-occupied housing units335———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return1,260———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return2—100·—IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move1,042———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$33,497—49—Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$73,214—88—BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$100,820k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,377———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,397———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over931———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over980———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over787———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain184———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line156———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,355———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,357———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago1,303———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain193———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census1,372———
Poverty rate (model-based)11.5%—66—Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000659———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004615———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008619———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012494———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016633———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020639———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024629———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population61.1%—46·—
Preventable hospital stays3,145—33—County Health Rankings
Prison population rate697—59·—
Private job growth-4.53—5·—BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs274———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0173—47—Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents72.5—90·—
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200079.8—96·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200488.5—100·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200884.3—99·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201293.7—100·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201688.7—97·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202092—100·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202493.8—100·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202414.1—68·—MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%—5·—IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit7.55%—5·—IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24.5%—89·—IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%—9·—IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.8%—20·—CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.7%—93—CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over uncertain13.2%—6·—Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain9.5%—84·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain32.2%—90·—Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago93.8%—97·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%—83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain19%—3·—Census ACS 5-year
Share now married66.5%—99·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic67.1%—31·—Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain4.51%—8·—Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain24.5%—62—Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37.6%—50—CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.933—93·—
Stroke2.4%—96—CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication55.5%—18·—CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed530———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,942———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population1,389———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.0435—98—Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed21———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.6%—43—BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain20.9%—73·—Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain106———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%—79—CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50280———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute503———Census ACS 5-year

16of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.