placestats

Pendleton County, WV

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6111
Density3.4people per km² of land
Median household income$61,738
Land area1803km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Pendleton County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Echols County, GA, Ramsey County, ND, Bath County, VA, Florence County, WI, Thayer County, NE, Cotton County, OK, Boundary County, ID, Greer County, OK. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Pendleton Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Arthritis31.2%0th pct2nd pct +4.2 sd
Congregations per 10,000 people89.5100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.6 sd
Frequent mental distress23%0th pct2nd pct +3.2 sd
Depression31.9%0th pct2nd pct +2.8 sd
High cholesterol36.6%0th pct1st pct +2.8 sd
Colorectal cancer screening62.6%98th pct88th pct +2.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4352861-0.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance uncertain9.3%7264-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work67,130 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.6%4630+0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability36.5%2223+0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying2.670·1·-1.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis31.2%02+4.2CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.06686150+0.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking16.4%7868-1.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents1.2494·67·+0.2
Black-white residential segregation51.7—53·—County Health Rankings
Business closing rate12.588·95·+1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments127———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.980·74·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1419+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents1.914·21·-1.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain20.9%3035+0.4Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.261%78·64·+0.9County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,194———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,194———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.8%9667+1.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.8%613+2.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability20%612+1.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening62.6%9888+2.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people89.5100·100·+3.6
Coronary heart disease6.7%1016+1.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma12.2%25+1.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking20.5%1011+1.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year54.1%2029-0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.948·8·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Depression31.9%02+2.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes12.6%823+1.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.46130·29·-0.7
Economic connectedness0.8194353-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.30812·22·-1.1
Education score0.66381·83·+0.9
Effective property tax rate0.3380·3·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,065———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents31.374·73·+0.4
Fair or poor self-rated health23.9%1023+1.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.58691-0.7County Health Rankings
Firearm share of suicides, standardised171—100·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Firearm suicide rate28.1—98·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.27%2810-0.7County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16.9%3741+0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress23%02+3.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress16%214+1.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02326779-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.155100·96·+2.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.38610097-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$206,760k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.67610·15·-1.4
Hearing disability7.3%5031-0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure37.5%619+2.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol36.6%01+2.8CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate82.5%82·91·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13.7%3441+0.3CDC PLACES
Housing units3,708———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,11161·57·-0.1
Income gap between arrivals and departures$10,63372·81·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.5%821+1.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths16623+2.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,1099·16·-1.0
Jail population rate57668·68·+0.4
Labour force3,156———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.5%3737+0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.2%3444+0.4CDC PLACES
Life expectancy74.7 years3245-0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness36%925+1.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents23.890·94·+1.3
Mammography in the past two years73.3%6648+0.4CDC PLACES
Material security score0.2751·51·+0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$54,2271011-1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$56,83366·56·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$46,20038·27·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work30.1 min416+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age50.8 years88·95·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$75444·28·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$178,60070·53·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$61,738—46—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$53,640823-1.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill6034·9·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.149%9496+1.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations9.982243-0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.2%1828+0.9CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain31.83211+0.6County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99768·77·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-1.5620·14·-0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.2716·8·-1.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30.9%2422+0.9CDC PLACES
Obesity36.8%6662-0.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,299———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents5.2684·86·+1.1
Owner-occupied housing units1,896———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,840———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return226·27·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,502———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$28,7832023-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,1993646-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$319,080k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,998———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,029———County Health Rankings
Population (firearm measures)5,941———CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Population aged 15 and over5,163———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,907———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,561———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,780———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line982———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line825———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,008———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,935———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,894———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher933———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,143———
Poverty rate16.3%1833+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13.9%4247-0.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4864448-0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,221———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,544———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,395———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,239———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,225———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,659———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,425———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population39.6%24·19·-0.7
Preventable hospital stays3,3272227+0.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate84267·71·+0.2
Private job growth-9.380·2·-1.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,024———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01912858-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps18.6%91·81·+1.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents63.570·81·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20006338·64·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200460.828·48·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200860.842·57·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201266.142·60·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201676.748·69·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202077.244·71·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202479.846·74·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.874·77·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.26%8·8·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit15.4%58·50·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12.9%18·36·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.46%74·80·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year77.7%100·80·+1.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.9%4240+0.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over29.1%94·96·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain9.12%12·13·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago96.4%100·99·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%94·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24%36·20·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married57.7%78·83·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of suicides by firearm100%—100·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Share White, not Hispanic94.8%96·95·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.22%80·89·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher20.5%5444-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours41.8%012+1.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.071426·54·-0.6
Stroke3.3%2835+0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60.4%100·80·+1.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,180———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,438———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off11.7%621+1.6CDC PLACES
Total population6,111———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.02868892+1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed91———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%5072-0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate38%82·96·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,409———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.1%5045-0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,030———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,229———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost10,5334044-0.0County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.