placestats

Logan County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population812
Density0.5people per km² of land
Median household income$71,650
Land area1478km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Logan County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Sully County, SD, Fallon County, MT, Hyde County, SD, Inyo County, CA, Pershing County, NV, San Juan County, CO, Millard County, UT, Wayne County, UT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Logan Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Private job growth-26.70th pct by value0th pct by value -4.7 sd
Catholic adherents81.498th pct by value100th pct by value +4.2 sd
Mutual-friend share0.9844th pct by value20th pct by value -2.5 sd
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over4.7%100th pct100th pct -2.3 sd
Business closing rate012th pct by value2nd pct by value -2.1 sd
Share now married72.4%96th pct by value100th pct by value +2.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5365693+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance7.8%9085-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work7,830 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%6294-0.9County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over4.7%100100-2.3CDC PLACES
Any disability24.5%10095-1.7CDC PLACES
Arthritis21.2%8690-1.2CDC PLACES
Average test score0.553100100+2.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.8%64+1.1CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents0100·45·—
Business closing rate012·2·-2.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments19———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate016·2·-1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%3619+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents81.498·100·+4.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain11%8685-1.1Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort149———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income149———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.6%6445+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.1%9290-1.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability11.9%9897-1.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening58.8%8461+1.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people55.984·97·+0.6
Coronary heart disease5%8889-1.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.2%9296-1.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking13.2%7483-0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year66.5%7887+0.8CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.9760·58·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression18.2%9696-1.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.4%7893-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.1798·95·+1.5
Economy score1.0134·61·-0.4
Effective property tax rate uncertain157·63·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed344———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents02·1·-1.2
Fair or poor self-rated health13.5%10097-1.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.35193-0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.33%5722+0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10%9796-1.1CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress14.7%9898-1.8CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress10.6%9897-1.6CDC PLACES
Friending clustering0.10717·34·-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.51525+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$41,923k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.058540·48·-0.3
Hearing disability6.4%8871-1.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.5%5481-0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol27.6%9298-1.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate78.5%74·74·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity8.5%9798-1.2CDC PLACES
Housing units356———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability6.3%9696-1.6CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate2,08242·52·-0.3
Jail population rate56167·67·-0.2
Labour force354———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation5.9%10097-1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support19.9%9095-1.0CDC PLACES
Loneliness29.5%10097-1.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents06·1·-1.1
Mammography in the past two years76.1%8673+1.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.15810·45·-1.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$58,526620-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of departing households$46,00020·27·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work uncertain21.7 min2969+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.8 years64·77·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$72519·21·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$160,00045·43·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$71,650—71—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$66,3334860-0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,60357·53·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.139%8394+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0345-1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability9.7%9094-1.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.9844·20·-2.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate054·35·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity23.7%3472+0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity36.2%3466+0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units311———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents040·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units244———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return710———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return290·94·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move603———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$38,0595472+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$68,2225883-0.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$45,095k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population661———BEA Regional Accounts
Population655———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over644———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over518———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over550———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over171———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain60———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined806———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined652———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago742———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain147———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census716———
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain9.2%8086-0.9Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000412———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004429———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008416———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012431———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016453———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020450———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024440———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population90.8%85·88·+1.0
Private job growth-26.70·0·-4.7BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs85———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.05158799+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps6.8%17·5·-0.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents81.488·95·+1.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200084.885·99·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200484.285·98·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200880.177·96·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20128477·95·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201692.694·100·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202091.594·99·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202494.298·100·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20249.3971·50·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%32·5·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%14·1·-1.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains32.4%84·98·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%64·9·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.2%78·31·+0.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.6%9695-1.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.1%34·64·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%81·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.4%70·86·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain17.7%14·2·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married72.4%96·100·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%93·11·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic89.5%58·71·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain7.3%66·58·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain26.7%7470+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours31.8%7090-0.6CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.6958·87·-0.0
Stroke2.6%8090-1.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.5%90·54·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed340———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,795———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off5.8%9395-1.1CDC PLACES
Total population812———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed10———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.8%4876-0.2BLS LAUS
Vision disability3.5%9495-1.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain128———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute361———Census ACS 5-year

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.