placestats

Hooker County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population613
Density0.3people per km² of land
Median household income$45,854
Land area1867km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Hooker County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Garden County, NE, Prairie County, MT, Union County, NM, Harney County, OR, Ziebach County, SD, Niobrara County, WY, Catron County, NM, Butte County, ID. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Hooker Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mainline Protestant adherents41.6100th pct by value99th pct by value +4.5 sd
Share in the same house a year ago73.6%0th pct by value1st pct by value -3.1 sd
Congregations per 10,000 people98.598th pct by value100th pct by value +2.9 sd
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.45%100th pct63rd pct +2.1 sd
Share widowed16.7%95th pct by value100th pct by value +2.1 sd
Average test score0.435100th pct98th pct +2.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.61210099+2.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.8%9671-1.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain4,440 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.9%7067-0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability27.6%9281-1.4CDC PLACES
Arthritis22.7%7275-0.6CDC PLACES
Average test score0.43510098+2.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.3%66+1.8CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents092·45·-0.3
Business closing rate13.384·97·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments22———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate024·2·-1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3032+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2072·81·+0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.4%9873-1.4Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort152———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening81%7219+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.2%8265-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.4%9288-1.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.3%9639+1.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people98.598·100·+2.9
Coronary heart disease5.5%8668-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.6%8289-0.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.6%6056-0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61.8%8466+0.9CDC PLACES
Depression19.2%9692-1.7CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.4%8276-0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.68692·78·+1.2
Economy score0.49660·32·+0.1
Education score0.40786·70·+1.2
Effective property tax rate1.4396·85·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed297———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents24.270·60·+0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health15.9%9686-1.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.16295-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.45%10063+2.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.5%9079-1.0CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population0———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress16%9090-1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.9%9283-1.4CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.3879497-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$38,738k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.29494·72·+1.2
Hearing disability7%8244-0.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.6%6870-0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.2%7286-0.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate59.9%8·7·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.7%9790-1.1CDC PLACES
Housing units415———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability7.4%9279-1.1CDC PLACES
Labour force307———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.9%9786-1.0CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21%8684-0.8CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.0861—1—Stanford Education Data Archive
Loneliness31%7688-0.7CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents41.6100·99·+4.5
Mammography in the past two years74%9254+1.2CDC PLACES
Material security score1.11100·95·+1.8
Mean adjusted gross income per return$59,3385922+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work17.7 min4489-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.8 years42·77·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$58116·4·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$85,40022·3·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$45,854—10—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$53,0105421+0.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,22271·35·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0545-0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.3%9077-1.1CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate-13.34·0·-1.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity26%5854-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity40.3%2027+0.8CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units314———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents30.886·98·+1.1
Owner-occupied housing units188———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return670———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return268·71·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move582———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$33,3636948+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,2023646-0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$36,018k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population677———BEA Regional Accounts
Population679———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over551———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over529———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over429———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain169———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line65———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined587———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined677———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago451———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain89———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census711———
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain9.6%9883-1.3Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000409———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004461———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008438———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012395———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016417———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020442———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024427———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Private job growth-24.52·0·-1.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs166———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps9.5%17·24·-0.9CDC PLACES
Religious adherents11796·100·+2.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200081.182·97·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20048696·99·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200882.694·98·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201284.890·96·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201689.992·98·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202086.476·94·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248778·94·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20245.9553·37·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%60·5·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%10·1·-1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains29.4%90·96·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%72·9·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.8%86·28·+1.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.1%9277-1.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over27.6%56·93·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%92·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race0%3·1·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago73.6%0·1·-3.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married34.8%78·81·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married39.2%14·6·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%71·11·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic87.1%63·64·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain16.7%95·100·+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain20.7%5646-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.3%7481-0.8CDC PLACES
Stroke2.9%8267-0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.1%86·64·+1.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed340———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,452———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.9%9381-1.1CDC PLACES
Total population613———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.0288—92—Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed10———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.3%4855-0.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain24.3%34·81·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain101———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%9479-1.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain122———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute251———Census ACS 5-year

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.