placestats

Chattahoochee County, GA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9181
Density14.3people per km² of land
Median household income$59,221
Land area644km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Chattahoochee County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Pointe Coupee Parish, LA, Humphreys County, TN, Lyon County, KS, Lincoln County, OK, Clay County, SD, Webster County, KY, Fulton County, IL, Vernon Parish, LA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Chattahoochee Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mutual-friend share0.810th pct by value0th pct by value -37.9 sd
Departures per 100 people staying47.7100th pct by value100th pct by value +19.6 sd
Arrivals per 100 people staying46.3100th pct by value100th pct by value +18.3 sd
Share in the same house a year ago62.4%0th pct by value0th pct by value -5.5 sd
Share never married57.6%100th pct by value100th pct by value +4.8 sd
Homeownership rate36%0th pct by value0th pct by value -4.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.354410-1.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance15.7%514+1.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work54,365 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over21.3%2018+0.9CDC PLACES
Any disability32.4%5946-0.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying46.3100·100·+18.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.8%6344-0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.329914-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking16%8574-1.0CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain10297·96·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents5.0182·88·+0.8
Black-white residential segregation25.93·9·-1.9County Health Rankings
Business closing rate9.7186·75·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments53———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate15.5100·97·+2.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.1%9588-2.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents010·6·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain16.7%8656-1.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.274%78·69·+0.5County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,445———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,445———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.7%6865+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.9%7346-0.8CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.9%8356-0.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.8%5652+0.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people9.414·12·-1.6
Coronary heart disease6.3%3930+0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.7%9587-1.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.3%6847-0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year51.4%1419-0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying47.7100·100·+19.6IRS county migration flows
Depression19.6%9891-1.7CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes14.2%210+2.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.21442·37·-0.1
Economic connectedness0.969478+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8337853+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.02230·11·-2.4
Education score0.42478·71·+0.7
Employed1,143———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents5.234·8·-1.1
Fair or poor self-rated health22.5%3431+0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.82016+0.8County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.33%1622-1.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity20.5%1823+0.9CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain475———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.1%8359-0.9CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.5%4635+0.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.049410099-2.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.08180·2·-3.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.36910099-3.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,988,900k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.18949·39·+0.0
Hearing disability6.7%7857-0.9CDC PLACES
High blood pressure38.6%1514+1.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.5%2413+0.8CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.975%9899+1.4County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate36%0·0·-4.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity17%919+1.3CDC PLACES
Housing units2,902———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.03182225+1.0Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate2970·3·-1.3
Income gap between arrivals and departures$51436·41·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.5%5434+0.0CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain689688-1.5County Health Rankings
Jail population rate00·1·-1.0
Labour force1,229———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation10.9%1823+1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25.3%4631+0.1CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.06236-1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy75.4 years6851+0.6County Health Rankings
Loneliness36.8%2118+0.9CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents0.480·3·-1.3
Mammography in the past two years73.5%6850+0.4CDC PLACES
Material security score0.2170·48·+0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$52,08708-2.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$52,02950·41·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$51,51578·47·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work9.8 min10099-2.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age23.9 years0·0·-3.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,23598·87·+3.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$59,221—38—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$57,5504234-0.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill98832·25·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0751%5254-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations005-2.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.9%3731+0.4CDC PLACES
Mobility score-0.839·16·-1.4
Mutual-friend share0.810·0·-37.9Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate5.8396·96·+2.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.412·6·-1.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity29.8%2928+0.6CDC PLACES
Obesity40.6%2925+0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,897———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents8.73100·94·+4.2
Owner-occupied housing units682———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,150———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return2100·100·+3.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,119———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$26,920416-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$39,33903-1.8BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$337,850k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,588———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,661———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,532———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,690———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,253———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain305———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain772———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,067———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,775———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,546———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,728———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,173———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,565———
Poverty rate uncertain16.2%3434+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)16.3%2630+0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5873227+0.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,207———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,688———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,653———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,490———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,390———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,582———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,694———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays2,1168075-0.8County Health Rankings
Prison population rate2972·14·-1.5
Private job growth13.698·98·+2.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,108———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02165870+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps17%67·75·+0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents19.48·2·-1.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200049.618·21·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200453.920·28·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200849.416·27·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201250.214·23·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201655.810·22·-1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202056.912·25·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202458.38·24·-1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20248.722·47·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.47%10·11·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit27.5%96·91·+2.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains9.16%20·15·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%0·9·-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year76.1%59·60·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.7%1019+1.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over uncertain3.32%0·0·-4.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic2.97%94·84·+2.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic18%86·78·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain5.76%0·1·-3.0Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain5.17%88·63·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race17.4%93·81·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago62.4%0·0·-5.5Census ACS 5-year
Share never married57.6%100·100·+4.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married35.7%2·3·-3.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain4.64%80·82·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic54.1%4·17·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher27.6%9272+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours41.3%2416+0.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.73310·12·-1.4
Stroke3.8%715+1.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication61.7%88·87·+1.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,730———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken6,149———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off11.5%1822+1.1CDC PLACES
Total population9,181———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.02027884+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed86———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate7%43+1.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate34.6%94·94·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,005———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability6.4%1021+1.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,758———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain180———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute5,549———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost9,9976650-0.4County Health Rankings

15of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.