placestats

Jackson County, CO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population1422
Density0.3people per km² of land
Median household income$41,809
Land area4180km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Jackson County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Butte County, ID, Hudspeth County, TX, Garden County, NE, Briscoe County, TX, Culberson County, TX, Baca County, CO, Prairie County, MT, Union County, NM. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Jackson Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Median household income (model-based)$96,811100th pct95th pct +7.3 sd
Business closing rate26.3100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.0 sd
Economy score1.42100th pct by value80th pct by value +2.3 sd
Net business formation rate-142nd pct by value0th pct by value -2.0 sd
Obesity29.5%98th pct94th pct -1.7 sd
Median home value$250,00094th pct by value76th pct by value +1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5468895+1.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance14.3%5820-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain6,600 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.556%194+0.7County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.8%8467-0.9CDC PLACES
Any disability32.8%7443-0.5CDC PLACES
Arthritis24.6%3446+0.2CDC PLACES
Binge drinking18.5%2434+0.5CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 500—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.3
Business closing rate26.3100·100·+3.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments53———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened7———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.382·87·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1419+1.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents5.0814·37·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.7%9661-1.4Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort231———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income231———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.6%6815+0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.7%3230+0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.4%4225+0.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.7%6414+0.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people36.336·83·-0.5
Coronary heart disease6.4%5426-0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.7%2811+0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.8%4641-0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year56.5%7038+0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.2121·11·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression25%2839+0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.8%8668-0.9CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.33566·33·+0.4
Economy score1.42100·80·+2.3
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.2050·0·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed696———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents9.2842·20·-0.6
Fair or poor self-rated health21%7641-0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.63589-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.24%447-0.1County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress19.3%4435+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.8%6630-0.4CDC PLACES
Friending clustering0.09985·20·-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.518184+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$158,570k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.9328·7·-0.3
Hearing disability7.8%5017-0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.6%9080-1.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.5%7082-0.7CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate73.2%50·44·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing units1,155———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability9.7%6031-0.3CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate1153·1·-0.6
Jail population rate28727·29·-0.4
Labour force716———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents4.7942·36·-0.4
Mammography in the past two years68.6%5614+0.1CDC PLACES
Mean adjusted gross income per return$67,0578546+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of departing households$58,66786·68·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work13.5 min8798-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age51.5 years78·95·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$250,00094·76·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$41,809—6—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$96,81110095+7.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill5138·5·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0996%7379+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0485-0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.4%8047-0.7CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99316·46·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-142·0·-2.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity23%9477-1.1CDC PLACES
Obesity29.5%9894-1.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units634———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents024·11·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units464———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return1,120———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return24·5·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move950———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,0688452+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$72,2908887+1.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$95,133k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,316———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,309———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over1,251———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over1,072———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over1,093———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over465———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain174———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,416———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,308———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago1,208———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain301———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census1,379———
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain13.3%8852-0.9Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000925———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004934———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008913———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012848———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016861———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020876———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024834———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population20%21·7·-1.0
Private job growth-3.0229·8·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs418———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0448498+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents19.10·2·-1.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200079.882·96·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200477.269·90·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200869.351·78·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201273.557·80·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201678.651·75·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202079.655·78·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202478.651·71·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-1.216·17·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%58·5·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit9.23%16·11·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains21.5%72·80·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%74·9·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year68.4%30·5·-0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.3%6628-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over32.7%86·98·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%93·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain10.1%28·23·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago85%28·19·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain27.8%53·48·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.9%84·79·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic84.3%67·57·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain5.2%7·15·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain27.5%8872+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.4%9487-1.4CDC PLACES
Stroke3.4%5630-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication51.7%6·8·-1.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed650———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken806———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population1,422———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed20———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.8%7476-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate45.1%94·98·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units521———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.9%7029-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain236———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year0———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute489———Census ACS 5-year

13of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.