Kenedy County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population—

Density—people per km² of land

Median household income—

Land area3778km²

No peer group: this county has no figure for density or median household income, so there is nothing to match it against. Only national percentiles are shown.

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.


Adult income rank of children raised poor here	0.417	—	48	—	Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance	36.5%	—	0	—	CDC PLACES
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over	34.9%	—	1	—	CDC PLACES
Any disability	39.1%	—	11	—	CDC PLACES
Arthritis	20.1%	—	96	—	CDC PLACES
Binge drinking	16.9%	—	61	—	CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50	0	—	1·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents	0	—	45·	—
Business closing rate	0	—	2·	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments	15	—	—	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed	0	—	—	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened	0	—	—	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate	0	—	2·	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer	4.6%	—	99	—	CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents	63.1	—	99·	—
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain	20.8%	—	36	—	Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households	0%	—	0·	—	County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort	107	—	—	—	Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening	80.3%	—	12	—	CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease	6%	—	71	—	CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability	20%	—	12	—	CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening	40.1%	—	0	—	CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people	28.6	—	68·	—
Coronary heart disease	6.4%	—	26	—	CDC PLACES
Current asthma	9.4%	—	93	—	CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking	15.5%	—	58	—	CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year	28.8%	—	3	—	CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying	23.7	—	100·	—	IRS county migration flows
Depression	20.5%	—	86	—	CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes	14.9%	—	7	—	CDC PLACES
Disability-free score	-1.19	—	10·	—
Economy score	-0.151	—	6·	—
Employed	94	—	—	—	BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents	0	—	1·	—
Fair or poor self-rated health	31.8%	—	2	—	CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter	10.5	—	4	—	County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees	0.46%	—	67	—	County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress	18.3%	—	55	—	CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress	16.7%	—	7	—	CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality uncertain	0.399	—	93	—	Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product	$313,390k	—	—	—	BEA Regional Accounts
Health score	-0.215	—	38·	—
Hearing disability	7.6%	—	21	—	CDC PLACES
High blood pressure	32.6%	—	51	—	CDC PLACES
High cholesterol	33.6%	—	27	—	CDC PLACES
Housing units uncertain	69	—	—	—	Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate	3,734	—	99·	—
Independent-living disability	10.3%	—	23	—	CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate	3,212	—	73·	—
Jail population rate	590	—	70·	—
Labour force	102	—	—	—	BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents	0	—	1·	—
Mammography in the past two years	61%	—	1	—	CDC PLACES
Mean adjusted gross income per return	$41,517	—	1	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of departing households	$54,455	—	57·	—	IRS county migration flows
Median age uncertain	65.5 years	—	100·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)	$43,037	—	4	—	Census SAIPE
Membership organisations	0	—	5	—	County Health Rankings
Mobility disability	17.9%	—	9	—	CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate	0	—	35·	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity	38%	—	3	—	CDC PLACES
Obesity	37.9%	—	52	—	CDC PLACES
Orthodox Christian adherents	0	—	78·	—
Other religion adherents	0	—	11·	—
People covered by a tax return	200	—	—	—	IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return	2	—	2·	—	IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move	198	—	—	—	IRS county migration flows
Per capita income uncertain	$31,183	—	36	—	Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income	$47,821	—	25	—	BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income	$16,785k	—	—	—	BEA Regional Accounts
Population	351	—	—	—	BEA Regional Accounts
Population	343	—	—	—	County Health Rankings
Population aged 18 and over	289	—	—	—	CDC PLACES
Population below the poverty line	51	—	—	—	Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined	342	—	—	—	Census SAIPE
Population, decennial census	350	—	—	—
Poverty rate (model-based)	14.9%	—	39	—	Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000	228	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004	169	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008	202	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012	167	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016	186	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020	194	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024	158	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population	66.4%	—	52·	—
Prison population rate	3,153	—	100·	—
Private job growth	-19.4	—	1·	—	BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs	174	—	—	—	BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Religious adherents	63.1	—	81·	—
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2000	47.1	—	15·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2004	49.1	—	17·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2008	46.5	—	21·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2012	50.6	—	24·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2016	45.9	—	12·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2020	66.1	—	42·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2024	73.9	—	57·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024	26.8	—	94·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions	0%	—	5·	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit	0%	—	1·	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains	0%	—	0·	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation	0%	—	9·	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year	69.1%	—	7·	—	CDC PLACES
Self-care disability	5.4%	—	9	—	CDC PLACES
Share Black, not Hispanic	0%	—	5·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain	90.4%	—	97·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago uncertain	86.5%	—	31·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic	0%	—	83·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share now married uncertain	46.9%	—	21·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic	0%	—	53·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share separated	0%	—	1·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours	42.9%	—	7	—	CDC PLACES
Stroke	3.4%	—	30	—	CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication	55.8%	—	19·	—	CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed	120	—	—	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken	578	—	—	—	Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed	8	—	—	—	BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate	7.8%	—	2	—	BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain	75.4%	—	100·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability	9.1%	—	3	—	CDC PLACES
Women who gave birth in the past year	0	—	—	—	Census ACS 5-year

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.