Share of some other race, not Hispanic and Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees
Across 955 counties, Share of some other race, not Hispanic and Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees have a link of +0.50, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). But compare places with the same population density, income and education, and what is left could easily be chance. Most of the first figure came from both measures following how urban, rich and educated a place is, not from a link with each other.
Mostly gone after adjusting
Every place, plotted
One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.
Loading every place…
What each measure is
Share of some other race, not Hispanic
The percentage of residents who report some other race alone and are not Hispanic. It is small almost everywhere. It is included so the eight shares cover everyone, with nobody left over.
Census ACS 5-year · ACS table B03002_008, divided by total population
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees
The percentage of people on Medicare who got a flu shot.
County Health Rankings · County Health Rankings v155
Highest and lowest
Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.
Counties
By share of some other race, not Hispanic
| Share of some other race, not Hispanic | Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Plymouth County, MA | 2.52% | 0.59% |
| Queens County, NY | 2.26% | 0.45% |
| Schenectady County, NY | 1.69% | 0.54% |
| Bristol County, MA | 1.63% | 0.55% |
| Essex County, NJ | 1.43% | 0.49% |
| Lowest | ||
| San Juan County, CO | 0% | 0.6% |
| Saguache County, CO | 0% | 0.27% |
| Rio Blanco County, CO | 0% | 0.21% |
| Mineral County, CO | 0% | 0.42% |
| Kiowa County, CO | 0% | 0.26% |
By flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees
| Share of some other race, not Hispanic | Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Story County, IA | 0.204% | 0.69% |
| Dane County, WI | 0.375% | 0.69% |
| Douglas County, KS | 0.511% | 0.66% |
| Lancaster County, NE | 0.288% | 0.64% |
| Orange County, NC | 0.426% | 0.64% |
| Lowest | ||
| Nome Census Area, AK | 0% | 0.03% |
| Kusilvak Census Area, AK | 0% | 0.03% |
| Bethel Census Area, AK | 0% | 0.03% |
| Greeley County, KS | 0% | 0.03% |
| Dundy County, NE | 0% | 0.06% |
States
By share of some other race, not Hispanic
| Share of some other race, not Hispanic | Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Massachusetts | 1.15% | 0.58% |
| New York | 0.901% | 0.51% |
| Rhode Island | 0.773% | 0.52% |
| New Jersey | 0.751% | 0.53% |
| Connecticut | 0.728% | 0.55% |
| Lowest | ||
| North Dakota | 0.245% | 0.49% |
| Iowa | 0.248% | 0.54% |
| Arkansas | 0.257% | 0.46% |
| Kentucky | 0.263% | 0.46% |
| Oklahoma | 0.281% | 0.44% |
By flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees
| Share of some other race, not Hispanic | Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Massachusetts | 1.15% | 0.58% |
| Delaware | 0.482% | 0.56% |
| Pennsylvania | 0.444% | 0.55% |
| Connecticut | 0.728% | 0.55% |
| Iowa | 0.248% | 0.54% |
| Lowest | ||
| Alaska | 0.613% | 0.32% |
| Nevada | 0.54% | 0.38% |
| Wyoming | 0.555% | 0.4% |
| New Mexico | 0.439% | 0.4% |
| Idaho | 0.548% | 0.4% |
Metro areas
By share of some other race, not Hispanic
| Share of some other race, not Hispanic | Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| East Stroudsburg, PA | 1.4% | 0.5% |
| Barnstable Town, MA | 1.25% | 0.59% |
| Cheyenne, WY | 1.23% | 0.44% |
| Kingston, NY | 1.23% | 0.52% |
| Providence-Warwick, RI-MA | 1.22% | 0.527% |
| Lowest | ||
| Zapata, TX | 0% | 0.31% |
| Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH | 0% | 0.458% |
| Weatherford, OK | 0% | 0.441% |
| Victoria, TX | 0% | 0.475% |
| Vernon, TX | 0% | 0.46% |
By flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees
| Share of some other race, not Hispanic | Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Ames, IA | 0.16% | 0.673% |
| Madison, WI | 0.352% | 0.663% |
| Lawrence, KS | 0.511% | 0.66% |
| Spirit Lake, IA | 0% | 0.62% |
| Lincoln, NE | 0.273% | 0.618% |
| Lowest | ||
| Port Lavaca, TX | 0% | 0.26% |
| Eagle Pass, TX | 0% | 0.26% |
| Corbin, KY | 0% | 0.289% |
| Elko, NV | 0.825% | 0.293% |
| Houghton, MI | 0% | 0.299% |
Cities and towns — Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees is not published for cities and towns
By share of some other race, not Hispanic
| Share of some other race, not Hispanic | Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Brockton city, MA | 6.8% | — |
| Framingham city, MA | 6.26% | — |
| New Bedford city, MA | 4.17% | — |
| Milford CDP, MA | 4.08% | — |
| Marlborough city, MA | 3.91% | — |
| Lowest | ||
| Terryville CDP, CT | 0% | — |
| Southwood Acres CDP, CT | 0% | — |
| Sandy Hook CDP, CT | 0% | — |
| Ridgefield CDP, CT | 0% | — |
| Pawcatuck CDP, CT | 0% | — |
ZIP codes — Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees is not published for ZIP codes
By share of some other race, not Hispanic
| Share of some other race, not Hispanic | Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| ZIP 11419 (New York city, NY) | 19.7% | — |
| ZIP 11436 (New York city, NY) | 11.7% | — |
| ZIP 07105 (Newark city, NJ) | 8.66% | — |
| ZIP 01702 (Framingham city, MA) | 8.45% | — |
| ZIP 11420 (New York city, NY) | 8.4% | — |
| Lowest | ||
| ZIP 08867 (Hunterdon County, NJ) | 0% | — |
| ZIP 08853 (Neshanic Station CDP, NJ) | 0% | — |
| ZIP 08833 (Hunterdon County, NJ) | 0% | — |
| ZIP 08826 (Hunterdon County, NJ) | 0% | — |
| ZIP 08758 (Ocean County, NJ) | 0% | — |
Counties furthest from the pattern
Compared with the straight line that best fits all 969 counties: the five with far more flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees than their share of some other race, not Hispanic would suggest, and the five with far less.
| Share of some other race, not Hispanic | Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Above the line | ||
| Story County, IA | 0.204% | 0.69% |
| Houston County, MN | 0% | 0.63% |
| Dane County, WI | 0.375% | 0.69% |
| Dickinson County, IA | 0% | 0.62% |
| Boone County, IA | 0% | 0.61% |
| Below the line | ||
| Nome Census Area, AK | 0% | 0.03% |
| Kusilvak Census Area, AK | 0% | 0.03% |
| Bethel Census Area, AK | 0% | 0.03% |
| Greeley County, KS | 0% | 0.03% |
| Queens County, NY | 2.26% | 0.45% |
Two series, one county
Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.
Loading…
Every version of the link
Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.
| Before adjusting for anything | +0.501 | 955 counties reporting both |
| After adjusting for density, income and education | -0.098 | the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is |
| Also adjusting for population size | -0.077 | size taken out as well as density |
| Also comparing only within each state | -0.062 | each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states |
| Giving bigger counties more weight | -0.094 | the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 156 equally weighted counties |
| Middle value inside single states | +0.487 | the link worked out inside each of 21 states with at least 20 counties reporting |
| Using ranks, after adjusting | -0.151 | uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link |
How much to believe it
Could it be chance?
The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 0.002. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 0.043. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 0.004.
Do nearby places look alike?
Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.22 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.
Did they change together?
The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where share of some other race, not hispanic rose most, did flu vaccination among medicare enrolleesmove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.
| Period | Counties | Change together | Within states | q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic | — | — | — | — |
| 2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years | 613 | +0.19 | +0.07 | 0.132 |
Measured over the nearest years published: Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees: 2019–2022 for the 2019–2023 row.
Not measurable over the main period, so only the second period is shown. How change is measured.
Related pairs
- Median gross rent and Share of some other race, not Hispanic — +0.27
- Median household income and Share of some other race, not Hispanic — +0.25
- Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees and Safety score — +0.23
- Share of some other race, not Hispanic and Share of suicides by firearm — -0.23
- Share of some other race, not Hispanic and Firearm share of suicides, standardised — -0.23
- Motor vehicle crash deaths and Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees — -0.22
- Colorectal cancer screening and Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees — +0.22
- Share of some other race, not Hispanic and Friending clustering — -0.20
Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Share of some other race, not Hispanic and Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees