placestats

Share of some other race, not Hispanic and Firearm share of suicides, standardised

Across 625 counties, Share of some other race, not Hispanic and Firearm share of suicides, standardised have a link of -0.54, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). But compare places with the same population density, income and education, and a weak link of -0.23 remains. Most of the first figure came from both measures following how urban, rich and educated a place is, not from a link with each other.

Mostly gone after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Share of some other race, not Hispanic

The percentage of residents who report some other race alone and are not Hispanic. It is small almost everywhere. It is included so the eight shares cover everyone, with nobody left over.

Census ACS 5-year · ACS table B03002_008, divided by total population

Firearm share of suicides, standardised

The gun share of suicides compared with what you would expect if each sex, age and race group here used guns at its national rate. 100 means it matches what the local population mix would predict. Above 100 means more gun suicide than that. It is the best county measure of gun access available, and it closely tracks RAND's state estimates of gun ownership.

CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database · CDC WONDER underlying cause of death, suicide by intent, firearm by mechanism, 2018-2023

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By share of some other race, not Hispanic

Share of some other race, not HispanicFirearm share of suicides, standardised
Highest
Plymouth County, MA2.52%45.9
Queens County, NY2.26%22.5
Schenectady County, NY1.69%57.2
Bristol County, MA1.63%47.8
Essex County, NJ1.43%42.6
Lowest
Van Buren County, AR0%106
Stone County, AR0%142
Sharp County, AR0%108
Searcy County, AR0%153
Scott County, AR0%129

By firearm share of suicides, standardised

Share of some other race, not HispanicFirearm share of suicides, standardised
Highest
Gates County, NC0%181
Hale County, AL0%178
Harrison County, MO0%177
Pendleton County, WV0%171
Pemiscot County, MO0%170
Lowest
New York County, NY0.801%12.9
Queens County, NY2.26%22.5
Kings County, NY0.981%24.6
Bronx County, NY0.995%26.6
Norfolk County, MA0.983%29.7
States

By share of some other race, not Hispanic

Share of some other race, not HispanicFirearm share of suicides, standardised
Highest
Massachusetts1.15%41.3
New York0.901%52
Rhode Island0.773%50.3
New Jersey0.751%51.7
Connecticut0.728%56.3
Lowest
North Dakota0.245%109
Iowa0.248%89.3
Arkansas0.257%115
Kentucky0.263%117
Oklahoma0.281%117

By firearm share of suicides, standardised

Share of some other race, not HispanicFirearm share of suicides, standardised
Highest
Wyoming0.555%130
Mississippi0.322%129
Alabama0.307%129
Louisiana0.46%121
Georgia0.527%120
Lowest
Massachusetts1.15%41.3
Hawaii0.348%45
District of Columbia0.64%46.9
Rhode Island0.773%50.3
New Jersey0.751%51.7
Metro areas

By share of some other race, not Hispanic

Share of some other race, not HispanicFirearm share of suicides, standardised
Highest
East Stroudsburg, PA1.4%115
Barnstable Town, MA1.25%38.8
Cheyenne, WY1.23%139
Kingston, NY1.23%73.1
Providence-Warwick, RI-MA1.22%49.8
Lowest
Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH0%120
Weatherford, OK0%110
Victoria, TX0%134
Vernon, TX0%159
Valdosta, GA0%126

By firearm share of suicides, standardised

Share of some other race, not HispanicFirearm share of suicides, standardised
Highest
Vernon, TX0%159
Mount Sterling, KY0%158
Hereford, TX0%152
Grenada, MS0%149
Elko, NV0.825%148
Lowest
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ1.03%35.2
Barnstable Town, MA1.25%38.8
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH1.2%39.2
Pittsfield, MA0.384%40.7
Urban Honolulu, HI0.293%40.9
Cities and towns — Firearm share of suicides, standardised is not published for cities and towns

By share of some other race, not Hispanic

Share of some other race, not HispanicFirearm share of suicides, standardised
Highest
Brockton city, MA6.8%—
Framingham city, MA6.26%—
New Bedford city, MA4.17%—
Milford CDP, MA4.08%—
Marlborough city, MA3.91%—
Lowest
Terryville CDP, CT0%—
Southwood Acres CDP, CT0%—
Sandy Hook CDP, CT0%—
Ridgefield CDP, CT0%—
Pawcatuck CDP, CT0%—
ZIP codes — Firearm share of suicides, standardised is not published for ZIP codes

By share of some other race, not Hispanic

Share of some other race, not HispanicFirearm share of suicides, standardised
Highest
ZIP 11419 (New York city, NY)19.7%—
ZIP 11436 (New York city, NY)11.7%—
ZIP 07105 (Newark city, NJ)8.66%—
ZIP 01702 (Framingham city, MA)8.45%—
ZIP 11420 (New York city, NY)8.4%—
Lowest
ZIP 08867 (Hunterdon County, NJ)0%—
ZIP 08853 (Neshanic Station CDP, NJ)0%—
ZIP 08833 (Hunterdon County, NJ)0%—
ZIP 08826 (Hunterdon County, NJ)0%—
ZIP 08758 (Ocean County, NJ)0%—

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 625 counties: the five with far more firearm share of suicides, standardised than their share of some other race, not Hispanic would suggest, and the five with far less.

Share of some other race, not HispanicFirearm share of suicides, standardised
Above the line
Laramie County, WY1.23%139
Elko County, NV0.85%148
Fulton County, PA1.32%127
Gates County, NC0%181
Monroe County, PA1.4%115
Below the line
New York County, NY0.801%12.9
Honolulu County, HI0.293%40.9
Berkshire County, MA0.384%40.7
Richmond County, NY0.539%39.2
Essex County, MA0.686%35.2

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything-0.537625 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education-0.229the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size-0.212size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state-0.003each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight-0.374the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 157 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states-0.291the link worked out inside each of 10 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting-0.119uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 7.4e-9. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 0.001. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 1.6e-8.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.48 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

Not measurable: at least one of these is published for too few of the years a change needs (2014–2019 or 2019–2023), or for too few counties in both.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Share of some other race, not Hispanic and Firearm share of suicides, standardised