Loving County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population—

Density—people per km² of land

Median household income$51,087

Land area1732km²

No peer group: this county has no figure for density or median household income, so there is nothing to match it against. Only national percentiles are shown.

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.


Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain	0.261%	—	62	—	County Health Rankings
Black Protestant adherents	0	—	45·	—
Business closing rate	0	—	2·	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments	16	—	—	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed	0	—	—	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened	0	—	—	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate	0	—	2·	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Catholic adherents	0	—	6·	—
Congregations per 10,000 people	0	—	0·	—
Economy score	3.46	—	99·	—
Employed	222	—	—	—	BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents	0	—	1·	—
Fine particulate matter	7.8	—	44	—	County Health Rankings
Gini index of income inequality uncertain	0.658	—	0	—	Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product	$10,725,000k	—	—	—	BEA Regional Accounts
Jail admission rate	4,614	—	83·	—
Jail population rate	1,636	—	97·	—
Labour force	225	—	—	—	BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents	0	—	1·	—
Mean adjusted gross income per return	$128,820	—	97	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Median age uncertain	68.9 years	—	100·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Median household income	$51,087	—	19	—	Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)	$86,760	—	91	—	Census SAIPE
Membership organisations	0	—	5	—	County Health Rankings
Net business formation rate	0	—	35·	—	Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Orthodox Christian adherents	0	—	78·	—
Other religion adherents	0	—	11·	—
People covered by a tax return	100	—	—	—	IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return	2	—	79·	—	IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move	50	—	—	—	IRS county migration flows
Per capita personal income	$210,370	—	100	—	BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income	$9,677k	—	—	—	BEA Regional Accounts
Population	46	—	—	—	BEA Regional Accounts
Population	43	—	—	—	County Health Rankings
Population aged 18 and over	30	—	—	—	CDC PLACES
Population for whom poverty status is determined	43	—	—	—	Census SAIPE
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher	0	—	—	—	Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census	64	—	—	—
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain	4.7%	—	100	—	Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000	156	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004	80	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008	79	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012	64	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016	65	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020	66	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024	97	—	—	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population	48.6%	—	29·	—
Religious adherents	0	—	0·	—
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2000	81	—	97·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2004	84.4	—	98·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2008	84.8	—	99·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2012	85.7	—	97·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2016	93.5	—	100·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2020	93.8	—	100·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2024	89.5	—	97·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024	8.49	—	46·	—	MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions	0%	—	5·	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit	0%	—	1·	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains	0%	—	0·	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation	0%	—	9·	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic	0%	—	24·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic	0%	—	5·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race	0%	—	1·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago	100%	—	100·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic	0%	—	83·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share now married	83.3%	—	100·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic	0%	—	53·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic	0%	—	2·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic	90.7%	—	76·	—	Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher	0%	—	0	—	Census ACS 5-year
Tax returns filed	50	—	—	—	IRS Statistics of Income
Unemployed	3	—	—	—	BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate	1.3%	—	100	—	BLS LAUS
Women aged 15 to 50	0	—	—	—	Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year	0	—	—	—	Census ACS 5-year

4of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.