Median home value and Share of some other race, not Hispanic
Across 996 counties, Median home value and Share of some other race, not Hispanic have a link of +0.61, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). But compare places with the same population density, income and education, and a very weak link of +0.15 remains. Most of the first figure came from both measures following how urban, rich and educated a place is, not from a link with each other.
Mostly gone after adjusting
Every place, plotted
One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.
Loading every place…
What each measure is
Median home value
What the owner of the middle owner-lived-in home says it would sell for. It is the owner's own guess, not an actual sale price.
Census ACS 5-year · ACS table B25077_001
Share of some other race, not Hispanic
The percentage of residents who report some other race alone and are not Hispanic. It is small almost everywhere. It is included so the eight shares cover everyone, with nobody left over.
Census ACS 5-year · ACS table B03002_008, divided by total population
Highest and lowest
Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.
Counties
By median home value
| Median home value | Share of some other race, not Hispanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| San Mateo County, CA | $1,494,500 | 0.841% |
| Marin County, CA | $1,390,000 | 0.784% |
| Santa Clara County, CA | $1,382,800 | 0.473% |
| San Francisco County, CA | $1,380,500 | 0.773% |
| New York County, NY | $1,108,900 | 0.801% |
| Lowest | ||
| Oglala Lakota County, SD | $45,600 | 0% |
| Stonewall County, TX | $54,700 | 0% |
| Hudspeth County, TX | $57,400 | 0% |
| Alexander County, IL | $58,700 | 0% |
| Comanche County, KS | $59,900 | 0% |
By share of some other race, not Hispanic
| Median home value | Share of some other race, not Hispanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Plymouth County, MA | $513,000 | 2.52% |
| Queens County, NY | $699,200 | 2.26% |
| Schenectady County, NY | $223,100 | 1.69% |
| Bristol County, MA | $421,800 | 1.63% |
| Essex County, NJ | $494,400 | 1.43% |
| Lowest | ||
| San Juan County, CO | $406,900 | 0% |
| Saguache County, CO | $200,000 | 0% |
| Rio Blanco County, CO | $243,400 | 0% |
| Mineral County, CO | $413,000 | 0% |
| Kiowa County, CO | $148,600 | 0% |
States
By median home value
| Median home value | Share of some other race, not Hispanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Hawaii | $808,200 | 0.348% |
| District of Columbia | $724,600 | 0.64% |
| California | $695,400 | 0.535% |
| Massachusetts | $525,800 | 1.15% |
| Washington | $519,800 | 0.546% |
| Lowest | ||
| Puerto Rico | $124,600 | 0.136% |
| West Virginia | $155,600 | 0.284% |
| Mississippi | $161,400 | 0.322% |
| Arkansas | $175,300 | 0.257% |
| Oklahoma | $185,900 | 0.281% |
By share of some other race, not Hispanic
| Median home value | Share of some other race, not Hispanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Massachusetts | $525,800 | 1.15% |
| New York | $403,000 | 0.901% |
| Rhode Island | $368,800 | 0.773% |
| New Jersey | $427,600 | 0.751% |
| Connecticut | $343,200 | 0.728% |
| Lowest | ||
| Puerto Rico | $124,600 | 0.136% |
| North Dakota | $241,100 | 0.245% |
| Iowa | $195,900 | 0.248% |
| Arkansas | $175,300 | 0.257% |
| Kentucky | $192,300 | 0.263% |
Metro areas — Median home value is not published for metro areas
By share of some other race, not Hispanic
| Median home value | Share of some other race, not Hispanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| East Stroudsburg, PA | — | 1.4% |
| Barnstable Town, MA | — | 1.25% |
| Cheyenne, WY | — | 1.23% |
| Kingston, NY | — | 1.23% |
| Providence-Warwick, RI-MA | — | 1.22% |
| Lowest | ||
| Zapata, TX | — | 0% |
| Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH | — | 0% |
| Weatherford, OK | — | 0% |
| Victoria, TX | — | 0% |
| Vernon, TX | — | 0% |
Cities and towns
By median home value
| Median home value | Share of some other race, not Hispanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Paradise Valley town, AZ | $2,000,001 | 0% |
| Atherton town, CA | $2,000,001 | 0% |
| Palo Alto city, CA | $2,000,001 | 0.344% |
| San Marino city, CA | $2,000,001 | 0% |
| Stanford CDP, CA | $2,000,001 | 0.613% |
| Lowest | ||
| Zephyrhills South CDP, FL | $41,900 | 0% |
| Raymondville city, TX | $48,200 | 0% |
| Beecher CDP, MI | $48,400 | 0% |
| Buena Vista CDP, MI | $51,800 | 0% |
| Muskegon Heights city, MI | $55,800 | 0% |
By share of some other race, not Hispanic
| Median home value | Share of some other race, not Hispanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Brockton city, MA | $405,500 | 6.8% |
| Framingham city, MA | $600,600 | 6.26% |
| New Bedford city, MA | $324,400 | 4.17% |
| Milford CDP, MA | $429,800 | 4.08% |
| Marlborough city, MA | $485,400 | 3.91% |
| Lowest | ||
| Terryville CDP, CT | $221,000 | 0% |
| Southwood Acres CDP, CT | $247,400 | 0% |
| Sandy Hook CDP, CT | $460,600 | 0% |
| Ridgefield CDP, CT | $843,200 | 0% |
| Pawcatuck CDP, CT | $330,700 | 0% |
ZIP codes
By median home value
| Median home value | Share of some other race, not Hispanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| ZIP 10007 (New York city, NY) | $2,000,001 | 0% |
| ZIP 85253 (Paradise Valley town, AZ) | $2,000,001 | 0% |
| ZIP 91108 (San Marino city, CA) | $2,000,001 | 0% |
| ZIP 94027 (Atherton town, CA) | $2,000,001 | 0% |
| ZIP 94305 (Stanford CDP, CA) | $2,000,001 | 0.614% |
| Lowest | ||
| ZIP 86505 (Apache County, AZ) | $35,700 | 0% |
| ZIP 86503 (Apache County, AZ) | $39,500 | 0% |
| ZIP 33815 (Lakeland city, FL) | $42,700 | 0% |
| ZIP 86504 (Apache County, AZ) | $45,600 | 0% |
| ZIP 66607 (Topeka city, KS) | $45,600 | 0% |
By share of some other race, not Hispanic
| Median home value | Share of some other race, not Hispanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| ZIP 11419 (New York city, NY) | $678,800 | 19.7% |
| ZIP 11436 (New York city, NY) | $602,800 | 11.7% |
| ZIP 07105 (Newark city, NJ) | $445,900 | 8.66% |
| ZIP 01702 (Framingham city, MA) | $563,600 | 8.45% |
| ZIP 11420 (New York city, NY) | $673,700 | 8.4% |
| Lowest | ||
| ZIP 08867 (Hunterdon County, NJ) | $579,700 | 0% |
| ZIP 08853 (Neshanic Station CDP, NJ) | $638,700 | 0% |
| ZIP 08833 (Hunterdon County, NJ) | $575,400 | 0% |
| ZIP 08826 (Hunterdon County, NJ) | $441,600 | 0% |
| ZIP 08758 (Ocean County, NJ) | $455,900 | 0% |
Counties furthest from the pattern
Compared with the straight line that best fits all 1,008 counties: the five with far more share of some other race, not Hispanic than their median home value would suggest, and the five with far less.
| Median home value | Share of some other race, not Hispanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Above the line | ||
| Plymouth County, MA | $513,000 | 2.52% |
| Queens County, NY | $699,200 | 2.26% |
| Schenectady County, NY | $223,100 | 1.69% |
| Bristol County, MA | $421,800 | 1.63% |
| Monroe County, PA | $241,200 | 1.4% |
| Below the line | ||
| Santa Clara County, CA | $1,382,800 | 0.473% |
| San Mateo County, CA | $1,494,500 | 0.841% |
| San Francisco County, CA | $1,380,500 | 0.773% |
| Marin County, CA | $1,390,000 | 0.784% |
| Honolulu County, HI | $873,000 | 0.293% |
Two series, one county
Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.
Loading…
Every version of the link
Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.
| Before adjusting for anything | +0.608 | 996 counties reporting both |
| After adjusting for density, income and education | +0.150 | the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is |
| Also adjusting for population size | +0.117 | size taken out as well as density |
| Also comparing only within each state | +0.013 | each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states |
| Giving bigger counties more weight | +0.125 | the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 161 equally weighted counties |
| Middle value inside single states | +0.611 | the link worked out inside each of 22 states with at least 20 counties reporting |
| Using ranks, after adjusting | +0.309 | uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link |
How much to believe it
Could it be chance?
The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 1.9e-6. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 0.037. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 3.6e-6.
Do nearby places look alike?
Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.19 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.
Did they change together?
The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where median home value rose most, did share of some other race, not hispanicmove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.
| Period | Counties | Change together | Within states | q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic | 941 | +0.04 | +0.01 | — |
| 2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years | 631 | +0.15 | +0.10 | — |
Both come from the American Community Survey, which asks a sample of households. Random error in a county's sample pushes both changes at once. So part of any agreement here is that shared error. It is shown, but not counted as a finding. How change is measured.
Related pairs
- Median home value and Local income tax collected — +0.70
- Median gross rent and Median home value — +0.59
- Median household income and Median home value — +0.50
- Median home value and Mean income of arriving households — +0.46
- Median home value and Returns claiming charitable contributions — +0.42
- Median home value and Mean income of departing households — +0.39
- Median home value and Share with a bachelor's degree or higher — +0.39
- Median home value and Mainline Protestant adherents — -0.36
Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Median home value and Share of some other race, not Hispanic