placestats

Median gross rent and Median home value

Where Median gross rent is higher, Median home value tends to be higher. The link is moderate: +0.59 across 3,160 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it. It holds inside states too. Measured separately within each of 41 states, the middle value of the link is +0.83.

Holds after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Median gross rent

The rent paid by the middle renting household, plus any utilities the renter pays. That is why it is called 'gross' rent, not just the rent in the lease.

Census ACS 5-year · ACS table B25064_001

Median home value

What the owner of the middle owner-lived-in home says it would sell for. It is the owner's own guess, not an actual sale price.

Census ACS 5-year · ACS table B25077_001

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By median gross rent

Median gross rentMedian home value
Highest
San Mateo County, CA$2,893$1,494,500
Santa Clara County, CA$2,814$1,382,800
Marin County, CA$2,584$1,390,000
San Francisco County, CA$2,419$1,380,500
Orange County, CA$2,352$915,500
Lowest
Issaquena County, MS$253$90,700
Cottle County, TX$323$54,100
Guánica Municipio, PR$330$82,800
Hardin County, IL$342$91,700
Worth County, MO$353$94,600

By median home value

Median gross rentMedian home value
Highest
San Mateo County, CA$2,893$1,494,500
Marin County, CA$2,584$1,390,000
Nantucket County, MA$2,070$1,387,000
Santa Clara County, CA$2,814$1,382,800
San Francisco County, CA$2,419$1,380,500
Lowest
Todd County, SD$537$45,200
Oglala Lakota County, SD$563$45,600
McDowell County, WV$686$49,200
Stewart County, GA$588$53,000
Cottle County, TX$323$54,100
States

By median gross rent

Median gross rentMedian home value
Highest
California$1,956$695,400
Hawaii$1,938$808,200
District of Columbia$1,900$724,600
Colorado$1,693$502,200
Massachusetts$1,687$525,800
Lowest
Puerto Rico$562$124,600
West Virginia$850$155,600
South Dakota$912$236,800
Arkansas$914$175,300
Mississippi$923$161,400

By median home value

Median gross rentMedian home value
Highest
Hawaii$1,938$808,200
District of Columbia$1,900$724,600
California$1,956$695,400
Massachusetts$1,687$525,800
Washington$1,682$519,800
Lowest
Puerto Rico$562$124,600
West Virginia$850$155,600
Mississippi$923$161,400
Arkansas$914$175,300
Oklahoma$980$185,900
Cities and towns

By median gross rent

Median gross rentMedian home value
Highest — 58 are at $3,500 or more; five shown.
Key Biscayne village, FL$3,500 or more$1,238,700
Nocatee CDP, FL$3,500 or more$585,000
Inverness village, IL$3,500 or more$704,100
Lincolnwood village, IL$3,500 or more$475,400
Long Grove village, IL$3,500 or more$746,700
Lowest
Guánica zona urbana, PR$300$78,300
Aguadilla zona urbana, PR$336$106,300
San Germán zona urbana, PR$404$116,700
Juana Díaz zona urbana, PR$404$110,900
Guayama zona urbana, PR$404$107,300

By median home value

Median gross rentMedian home value
Highest
Paradise Valley town, AZ$3,500 or more$2,000,001
Alamo CDP, CA$3,500 or more$2,000,001
Atherton town, CA$3,500 or more$2,000,001
Belmont city, CA$2,894$2,000,001
Beverly Hills city, CA$2,805$2,000,001
Lowest
Kayenta CDP, AZ$786$37,900
Zephyrhills South CDP, FL$1,073$41,900
Johnstown city, PA$616$42,100
Flint city, MI$859$47,600
Raymondville city, TX$945$48,200
ZIP codes

By median gross rent

Median gross rentMedian home value
Highest — 66 are at $3,500 or more; five shown.
ZIP 10005 (New York city, NY)$3,500 or more$1,387,200
ZIP 10007 (New York city, NY)$3,500 or more$2,000,001
ZIP 10018 (New York city, NY)$3,500 or more$947,100
ZIP 10069 (New York city, NY)$3,500 or more$2,000,001
ZIP 10280 (New York city, NY)$3,500 or more$893,800
Lowest
ZIP 00913 (San Juan zona urbana, PR)$268$431,000
ZIP 00653 (Guánica Municipio, PR)$326$80,400
ZIP 00670 (Las Marías Municipio, PR)$355$89,600
ZIP 00638 (Ciales Municipio, PR)$404$94,500
ZIP 00606 (Maricao Municipio, PR)$405$100,700

By median home value

Median gross rentMedian home value
Highest
ZIP 10007 (New York city, NY)$3,500 or more$2,000,001
ZIP 10013 (New York city, NY)$2,378$2,000,001
ZIP 10069 (New York city, NY)$3,500 or more$2,000,001
ZIP 10282 (New York city, NY)$3,500 or more$2,000,001
ZIP 85253 (Paradise Valley town, AZ)$1,935$2,000,001
Lowest
ZIP 48505 (Flint city, MI)$749$28,300
ZIP 10475 (New York city, NY)$1,221$31,900
ZIP 86505 (Apache County, AZ)$526$35,700
ZIP 44502 (Youngstown city, OH)$915$37,500
ZIP 86033 (Navajo County, AZ)$738$38,300

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 3,175 counties: the five with far more median home value than their median gross rent would suggest, and the five with far less.

Median gross rentMedian home value
Above the line
Teton County, WY$1,758$1,371,900
Nantucket County, MA$2,070$1,387,000
Dukes County, MA$1,371$1,104,100
San Francisco County, CA$2,419$1,380,500
Pitkin County, CO$1,880$1,131,200
Below the line
Manassas Park city, VA$2,175$381,200
Bethel Census Area, AK$1,454$120,600
Esmeralda County, NV$1,319$102,500
Kendall County, IL$1,763$298,900
Hyde County, NC$1,237$119,600

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything+0.8483,160 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education+0.592the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size+0.582size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state+0.399each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight+0.718the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 292 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states+0.834the link worked out inside each of 41 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting+0.487uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 2.4e-297. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 1.1e-6. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 3.5e-296.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.48 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where median gross rent rose most, did median home valuemove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.

PeriodCountiesChange togetherWithin statesq
2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic3,172+0.24+0.17—
2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years3,155+0.18+0.08—

Both come from the American Community Survey, which asks a sample of households. Random error in a county's sample pushes both changes at once. So part of any agreement here is that shared error. It is shown, but not counted as a finding. How change is measured.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Median gross rent and Median home value