Millionaire returns as a share of all returns
Millionaire tax returns as a percentage of all returns filed from the state.
How it has moved
Loading…
Every state, every year
One row per state and one column per year, sorted by the latest value. It shows states, not counties: nobody can scan 3,222 rows, and the pattern only shows when it all fits on one screen.
Loading…
Where it comes from
IRS Statistics of Income, state data · IRS SOI Historic Table 2, AGI $1,000,000 or more
Tax returns with adjusted gross income of $1 million or more, as a share of all returns.
Combining areas: it cannot be combined, so it is shown only where its publisher works it out.
What it goes with
The strongest links that have a page of their own. Unadjusted is the link before adjusting for anything, from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). Adjusted compares places with the same population density, income and education levels, so those differences can’t explain the link. This list leaves out the 1 pairs built from the same numbers or the same model as this measure, since they are bound to match. These compare 52 states, not counties. With only about fifty places behind each figure, none of them is strong evidence on its own.
| Measure | Unadjusted | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| ArthritisLinked across states, but mostly as both follow how urban, rich and educated a place is. Comparing only places with similar density, income and education, what is left could easily be chance. | -0.67 | -0.33 |
| Per capita incomeLinked across states, but mostly as both follow how urban, rich and educated a place is. Comparing only places with similar density, income and education, what is left could easily be chance. | +0.74 | +0.32 |
| Share with a bachelor's degree or higherLinked across states, but mostly as both follow how urban, rich and educated a place is. Comparing only places with similar density, income and education, what is left could easily be chance. | +0.70 | +0.31 |
| Median property tax billLinked across states, but mostly as both follow how urban, rich and educated a place is. Comparing only places with similar density, income and education, what is left could easily be chance. | +0.63 | +0.26 |
| Returns reporting capital gainsLinked across states, but mostly as both follow how urban, rich and educated a place is. Comparing only places with similar density, income and education, what is left could easily be chance. | +0.62 | +0.25 |
| Median household incomeLinked across states, but mostly as both follow how urban, rich and educated a place is. Comparing only places with similar density, income and education, what is left could easily be chance. | +0.63 | +0.23 |
| Median gross rentLinked across states, but mostly as both follow how urban, rich and educated a place is. Comparing only places with similar density, income and education, what is left could easily be chance. | +0.65 | +0.22 |
| Infant mortalityLinked across states, but mostly as both follow how urban, rich and educated a place is. Comparing only places with similar density, income and education, what is left could easily be chance. | -0.52 | -0.19 |
| Orthodox Christian adherentsLinked across states, but mostly as both follow how urban, rich and educated a place is. Comparing only places with similar density, income and education, what is left could easily be chance. | +0.58 | +0.19 |
| Share widowedLinked across states, but mostly as both follow how urban, rich and educated a place is. Comparing only places with similar density, income and education, what is left could easily be chance. | -0.53 | -0.17 |
Population makeup
How this measure varies with the racial and ethnic makeup of states. Every group is shown, whatever its rank. These are links across states: they describe places, not people. They say nothing about any person’s risk or behaviour based on their race. States with a larger share of one group also differ in much else, such as income, segregation, region and history. The adjusted figure only accounts for density, income and education.
| Share of residents | Unadjusted | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Share White, not HispanicCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. | -0.23 | -0.18 |
| Share Black, not HispanicCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. | +0.13 | -0.01 |
| Share Hispanic or Latino, any raceCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. | +0.15 | +0.32 |
| Share Asian, not HispanicCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. | +0.20 | -0.11 |
| Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not HispanicCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. | -0.16 | +0.04 |
Highest and lowest
Of 52 states reporting it. These are the two ends of a national ranking. For most measures, that ranking mostly sorts places by income and how urban they are. That is why the place pages compare each place with similar places instead.
Highest
- District of Columbia — 0.967
- Connecticut — 0.903
- Massachusetts — 0.763
- New York — 0.732
- California — 0.718
Lowest
- West Virginia — 0.159
- Mississippi — 0.211
- New Mexico — 0.211
- Kentucky — 0.243
- Arkansas — 0.265
The middle state reports 0.364. The middle half of states falls between 0.307 and 0.5 (the 25th to 75th percentile).
All measures · Explore its pairs · How the US county data works