placestats

Firearm share of suicides, standardised and Evangelical Protestant adherents

A county is not a congregation. Counties where more people are counted as adherents (members of a religious group) also tend to differ on the other measure, and that is all. It does not follow that the adherents are the people with the different score. Making that leap is called the ecological fallacy: reading a pattern across places as a fact about individual people. It is as easy to fall into here as with the voting pairs. Two things about the counting matter too. Adherents are counted where their congregation meets, not where they live, so thirty very small counties exceed 100%. And a denomination that did not report is missing, not zero. That undercounts membership most where churches are least formally organised.

Where Firearm share of suicides, standardised is higher, Evangelical Protestant adherents tends to be higher. The link is weak: +0.33 across 2,220 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it. It holds inside states too. Measured separately within each of 35 states, the middle value of the link is +0.12.

Holds after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Firearm share of suicides, standardised

The gun share of suicides compared with what you would expect if each sex, age and race group here used guns at its national rate. 100 means it matches what the local population mix would predict. Above 100 means more gun suicide than that. It is the best county measure of gun access available, and it closely tracks RAND's state estimates of gun ownership.

CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database · CDC WONDER underlying cause of death, suicide by intent, firearm by mechanism, 2018-2023

Evangelical Protestant adherents

Members of evangelical Protestant churches, such as Southern Baptist, Assemblies of God, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod and about two hundred others, as a share of the population.

· Religion Census EVANRATE (2010, 2020)

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By firearm share of suicides, standardised

Firearm share of suicides, standardisedEvangelical Protestant adherents
Highest
Gates County, NC18138.5
Hale County, AL17828.3
Harrison County, MO17741.1
Ritchie County, WV1769.3
Teton County, MT17522.4
Lowest
New York County, NY12.94.99
Queens County, NY22.54.77
Kings County, NY24.64.92
Bronx County, NY26.64.33
Norfolk County, MA29.71.98

By evangelical Protestant adherents

Firearm share of suicides, standardisedEvangelical Protestant adherents
Highest
Edmonson County, KY136129
Yalobusha County, MS11683.4
Caldwell County, KY13480.5
Eastland County, TX11079
Bell County, KY93.676.4
Lowest
Clear Creek County, CO1110
Juab County, UT1280
Utah County, UT1040.38
Wasatch County, UT1030.46
Garfield County, UT1250.71
States

By firearm share of suicides, standardised

Firearm share of suicides, standardisedEvangelical Protestant adherents
Highest
Wyoming13011.2
Mississippi12939
Alabama12942.1
Louisiana12125
Georgia12026.2
Lowest
Massachusetts41.33.65
Hawaii459.29
District of Columbia46.915.3
Rhode Island50.33.83
New Jersey51.75.1

By evangelical Protestant adherents

Firearm share of suicides, standardisedEvangelical Protestant adherents
Highest
Alabama12942.1
Oklahoma11741.9
Mississippi12939
Arkansas11538.3
Tennessee11836.3
Lowest
Utah1032.03
Massachusetts41.33.65
Rhode Island50.33.83
New Hampshire93.84.84
New Jersey51.75.1
Metro areas

By firearm share of suicides, standardised

Firearm share of suicides, standardisedEvangelical Protestant adherents
Highest
Cleveland, MS17331.9
Rio Grande City-Roma, TX1673.83
Winnemucca, NV1617.43
Snyder, TX16035.7
Brenham, TX15920.7
Lowest
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ35.24.4
Barnstable Town, MA38.82.6
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH39.23.42
Pittsfield, MA40.73.4
Urban Honolulu, HI40.98.14

By evangelical Protestant adherents

Firearm share of suicides, standardisedEvangelical Protestant adherents
Highest
Middlesborough, KY93.676.4
Vernon, TX15968.1
Durant, OK10564.6
Gadsden, AL12764.5
Mount Pleasant, TX15062.1
Lowest
Provo-Orem-Lehi, UT1050.373
Heber, UT1050.702
Amherst Town-Northampton, MA52.20.82
Rexburg, ID1071.21
Logan, UT-ID1061.32

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 2,220 counties: the five with far more evangelical Protestant adherents than their firearm share of suicides, standardised would suggest, and the five with far less.

Firearm share of suicides, standardisedEvangelical Protestant adherents
Above the line
Edmonson County, KY136129
Yalobusha County, MS11683.4
Bell County, KY93.676.4
Eastland County, TX11079
Caldwell County, KY13480.5
Below the line
Starr County, TX1673.83
Caribou County, ID1520.75
White Pine County, NV1562.64
Ritchie County, WV1769.3
Crawford County, WI1543.4

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything+0.4022,220 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education+0.328the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size+0.307size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state+0.023each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight+0.493the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 274 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states+0.122the link worked out inside each of 35 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting+0.363uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 6.5e-57. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 6.6e-12. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 3.9e-56.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.48 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

Not measurable: at least one of these is published for too few of the years a change needs (2014–2019 or 2019–2023), or for too few counties in both.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Firearm share of suicides, standardised and Evangelical Protestant adherents