placestats

Children in single-parent households and Violent crime rate

Where Children in single-parent households is higher, Violent crime rate tends to be higher. The link is weak: +0.36 across 2,109 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it. It holds inside states too. Measured separately within each of 35 states, the middle value of the link is +0.41.

Holds after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Children in single-parent households

The percentage of children who live in a household headed by one parent.

County Health Rankings · County Health Rankings v082

Violent crime rate

Murders, rapes, robberies and aggravated assaults in the year, per 100,000 residents, from the FBI. It counts only crimes reported to police or found by them, so crimes nobody reports are missing. For a state, the figure is the FBI's estimate, which fills in for police agencies that did not report. For a county, it is only what the agencies reported, and it is shown only where agencies that reported for all 12 months serve at least 90% of the people who live there.

FBI Uniform Crime Reporting program (Crime Data Explorer) · FBI Crime Data Explorer: states, estimated_crimes violent_crime; counties, Return A master file, actual offenses

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By children in single-parent households

Children in single-parent householdsViolent crime rate
Highest
McCormick County, SC0.779%111
East Carroll Parish, LA0.746%528
Bullock County, AL0.713%501
Tunica County, MS0.682%855
Greene County, AL0.681%259
Lowest
Kenedy County, TX0%275
Jeff Davis County, TX0%375
Meagher County, MT0%245
Custer County, ID0%153
Holmes County, OH0.0547%5.21

By violent crime rate

Children in single-parent householdsViolent crime rate
Highest
Shelby County, TN0.421%1,876
Crittenden County, AR0.471%1,764
Baltimore city, MD0.498%1,694
St. Louis city, MO0.465%1,457
Robeson County, NC0.462%1,421
Lowest
Conejos County, CO0.0997%0
Menominee County, WI0.478%0
Hansford County, TX0.178%0
Kingsbury County, SD0.0947%0
McHenry County, ND0.0867%0
States

By children in single-parent households

Children in single-parent householdsViolent crime rate
Highest
District of Columbia0.454%1,142
Mississippi0.37%202
Louisiana0.345%562
Alabama0.306%417
New Mexico0.305%747
Lowest
Utah0.146%231
Idaho0.17%240
North Dakota0.181%280
Wyoming0.181%194
New Hampshire0.184%115

By violent crime rate

Children in single-parent householdsViolent crime rate
Highest
District of Columbia0.454%1,142
New Mexico0.305%747
Alaska0.214%734
Tennessee0.273%636
Arkansas0.278%623
Lowest
Maine0.188%104
New Hampshire0.184%115
Connecticut0.25%152
Rhode Island0.256%167
Wyoming0.181%194
Metro areas

By children in single-parent households

Children in single-parent householdsViolent crime rate
Highest
Orangeburg, SC0.565%1,414
Selma, AL0.538%730
Cordele, GA0.535%1,008
Eufaula, AL-GA0.534%400
Roanoke Rapids, NC0.502%534
Lowest
Rexburg, ID0.0695%81.7
Selinsgrove, PA0.0956%63.1
Granbury, TX0.0972%161
Kirksville, MO0.106%373
Provo-Orem-Lehi, UT0.107%114

By violent crime rate

Children in single-parent householdsViolent crime rate
Highest
Memphis, TN-MS-AR0.389%1,453
Lumberton, NC0.462%1,421
Orangeburg, SC0.565%1,414
Forrest City, AR0.498%1,324
Albuquerque, NM0.298%1,152
Lowest
Quincy, IL-MO0.203%0
Lexington, NE0.215%0
Columbus, IN0.23%16.1
Pikeville, KY0.274%31.1
Moscow, ID0.166%35.7

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 2,113 counties: the five with far more violent crime rate than their children in single-parent households would suggest, and the five with far less.

Children in single-parent householdsViolent crime rate
Above the line
Shelby County, TN0.421%1,876
Crittenden County, AR0.471%1,764
Baltimore city, MD0.498%1,694
Alameda County, CA0.19%1,332
Pulaski County, AR0.372%1,380
Below the line
McCormick County, SC0.779%111
Sioux County, ND0.575%27.4
Menominee County, WI0.478%0
Worth County, MO0.463%0
Greene County, AL0.681%259

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything+0.4542,109 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education+0.360the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size+0.371size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state+0.323each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight+0.446the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 236 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states+0.408the link worked out inside each of 35 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting+0.328uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 1.5e-65. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 2.5e-9. The site tested 29,403 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 1.2e-64.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.30 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where children in single-parent households rose most, did violent crime ratemove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.

PeriodCountiesChange togetherWithin statesq
2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic1,805-0.02-0.010.916
2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years1,668+0.00-0.010.918

Over the main period, any link between the changes could easily be chance. How change is measured.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Children in single-parent households and Violent crime rate