Homeownership rate and Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees
Counting counties equally, Homeownership rate and Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees have a link of -0.09 across 3,119 counties, on a scale from −1 to +1. Giving bigger places more weight asks about the average resident rather than the average place, and it flips the link to +0.17. Neither figure is likely to be chance. So this is a real disagreement about who is being described.
Flips when bigger places count more
Every place, plotted
One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.
Loading every place…
What each measure is
Homeownership rate
The percentage of lived-in homes that are owned, not rented. Empty homes are left out of the count entirely.
Census ACS 5-year · ACS table B25003_002, divided by occupied housing units
Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees
Hospital stays, counted from admission to discharge, in a year for every 1,000 people in traditional Medicare. It includes all kinds of stays, not only those that better care might have prevented. It leaves out people in private Medicare Advantage plans.
CMS Medicare Geographic Variation Public Use File · CMS Medicare Geographic Variation PUF, national/state/county, all ages, IP_CVRD_STAYS_PER_1000_BENES
Highest and lowest
Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.
Counties
By homeownership rate
| Homeownership rate | Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Storey County, NV | 97.4% | 189 |
| Cameron Parish, LA | 96.9% | 194 |
| Edwards County, TX | 94.5% | 172 |
| Elbert County, CO | 94.4% | 188 |
| Oliver County, ND | 93.4% | 135 |
| Lowest | ||
| Bronx County, NY | 20.3% | 305 |
| New York County, NY | 24.7% | 228 |
| Aleutians West Census Area, AK | 29.5% | 166 |
| Kings County, NY | 29.7% | 268 |
| Hudson County, NJ | 31.2% | 255 |
By hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees
| Homeownership rate | Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Oglala Lakota County, SD | 53.5% | 537 |
| North Slope Borough, AK | 49.5% | 425 |
| Red River Parish, LA | 76.7% | 408 |
| Caldwell Parish, LA | 69% | 401 |
| Todd County, SD | 44.9% | 388 |
| Lowest | ||
| Rich County, UT | 80.4% | 68.5 |
| Ouray County, CO | 78% | 78.6 |
| San Miguel County, CO | 65.2% | 85.9 |
| Harding County, SD | 77.1% | 90.5 |
| Gilpin County, CO | 79.6% | 92.9 |
States
By homeownership rate
| Homeownership rate | Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| West Virginia | 74.3% | 249 |
| Maine | 74% | 178 |
| Michigan | 72.9% | 244 |
| Vermont | 72.8% | 181 |
| New Hampshire | 72.5% | 197 |
| Lowest | ||
| District of Columbia | 41.1% | 233 |
| New York | 54.3% | 248 |
| California | 55.8% | 212 |
| Nevada | 59.3% | 221 |
| Hawaii | 62.6% | 144 |
By hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees
| Homeownership rate | Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Massachusetts | 62.6% | 259 |
| Florida | 67.3% | 259 |
| Illinois | 66.8% | 252 |
| Connecticut | 66.2% | 251 |
| West Virginia | 74.3% | 249 |
| Lowest | ||
| Hawaii | 62.6% | 144 |
| Idaho | 72.4% | 153 |
| Montana | 69.4% | 158 |
| Puerto Rico | 68.1% | 159 |
| Oregon | 63.4% | 160 |
Metro areas
By homeownership rate
| Homeownership rate | Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Wildwood-The Villages, FL | 88.1% | 212 |
| Hemlock Farms, PA | 86.2% | 205 |
| Holland, MI | 86.1% | 198 |
| Homosassa Springs, FL | 84.8% | 252 |
| DeRidder, LA | 83.2% | 221 |
| Lowest | ||
| Pullman, WA | 46.6% | 139 |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 48.6% | 241 |
| Carbondale, IL | 49.3% | 234 |
| Laramie, WY | 49.4% | 154 |
| Lawrence, KS | 49.5% | 185 |
By hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees
| Homeownership rate | Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Durant, OK | 63.6% | 371 |
| Moultrie, GA | 63.4% | 370 |
| Rio Grande City-Roma, TX | 71.6% | 349 |
| Frankfort, KY | 68.4% | 345 |
| Okeechobee, FL | 74.6% | 329 |
| Lowest | ||
| Sandpoint, ID | 77.6% | 106 |
| Breckenridge, CO | 70.5% | 110 |
| Ellensburg, WA | 62.3% | 119 |
| Kahului-Wailuku, HI | 65% | 119 |
| Steamboat Springs, CO | 74.6% | 121 |
Cities and towns — Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees is not published for cities and towns
By homeownership rate
| Homeownership rate | Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| East Hills village, NY | 100% | — |
| White Rock CDP, NM | 99.6% | — |
| Hooper city, UT | 99.4% | — |
| Marvin village, NC | 99.3% | — |
| Todd Creek CDP, CO | 99.2% | — |
| Lowest | ||
| Fort Carson CDP, CO | 0% | — |
| Air Force Academy CDP, CO | 0% | — |
| Camp Pendleton Mainside CDP, CA | 0% | — |
| North Fort Lewis CDP, WA | 0% | — |
| Lackland AFB CDP, TX | 0% | — |
ZIP codes — Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees is not published for ZIP codes
By homeownership rate
| Homeownership rate | Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| ZIP 29207 (Columbia city, SC) | 100% | — |
| ZIP 08056 (Gloucester County, NJ) | 100% | — |
| ZIP 48380 (Oakland County, MI) | 99.7% | — |
| ZIP 87547 (White Rock CDP, NM) | 99.6% | — |
| ZIP 06419 (Middlesex County, CT) | 99.5% | — |
| Lowest | ||
| ZIP 01003 (Amherst Town city, MA) | 0% | — |
| ZIP 99703 (Fairbanks city, AK) | 0% | — |
| ZIP 99505 (Anchorage municipality, AK) | 0% | — |
| ZIP 93106 (University of California-Santa Barbara CDP, CA) | 0% | — |
| ZIP 92136 (San Diego city, CA) | 0% | — |
Counties furthest from the pattern
Compared with the straight line that best fits all 3,137 counties: the five with far more hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees than their homeownership rate would suggest, and the five with far less.
| Homeownership rate | Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees | |
|---|---|---|
| Above the line | ||
| Oglala Lakota County, SD | 53.5% | 537 |
| Red River Parish, LA | 76.7% | 408 |
| North Slope Borough, AK | 49.5% | 425 |
| Caldwell Parish, LA | 69% | 401 |
| Franklin County, KY | 64.4% | 386 |
| Below the line | ||
| Rich County, UT | 80.4% | 68.5 |
| San Miguel County, CO | 65.2% | 85.9 |
| Ouray County, CO | 78% | 78.6 |
| Harding County, SD | 77.1% | 90.5 |
| Jackson County, CO | 73.2% | 97.6 |
Two series, one county
Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.
Loading…
Every version of the link
Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.
| Before adjusting for anything | -0.158 | 3,119 counties reporting both |
| After adjusting for density, income and education | -0.090 | the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is |
| Also adjusting for population size | -0.107 | size taken out as well as density |
| Also comparing only within each state | -0.162 | each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states |
| Giving bigger counties more weight | +0.167 | the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 287 equally weighted counties |
| Middle value inside single states | -0.234 | the link worked out inside each of 40 states with at least 20 counties reporting |
| Using ranks, after adjusting | -0.045 | uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link |
How much to believe it
Could it be chance?
The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 5.4e-7. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 0.023. The site tested 29,403 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 1.1e-6.
Do nearby places look alike?
Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.41 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.
Did they change together?
The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where homeownership rate rose most, did hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrolleesmove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.
| Period | Counties | Change together | Within states | q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic | 3,132 | +0.02 | +0.01 | 0.912 |
| 2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years | 3,134 | +0.05 | +0.03 | 0.435 |
Over the main period, any link between the changes could easily be chance. How change is measured.
Related pairs
- Homeownership rate and Median age — +0.58
- Homeownership rate and Share never married — -0.53
- Homeownership rate and Share aged 65 and over — +0.53
- Homeownership rate and Share foreign-born — -0.46
- Homeownership rate and Share now married — +0.46
- Homeownership rate and Property crime rate — -0.44
- Homeownership rate and Share White, not Hispanic — +0.44
- Homeownership rate and Share in the same house a year ago — +0.42
Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Homeownership rate and Hospital stays per 1,000 Medicare enrollees