placestats

Medicare spending per enrollee and Heating degree days

Where Medicare spending per enrollee is higher, Heating degree days tends to be lower. The link is moderate: -0.46 across 3,089 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it. It holds inside states too. Measured separately within each of 39 states, the middle value of the link is -0.21.

Holds after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Medicare spending per enrollee

What Medicare spent per person in a year, for people in traditional Medicare, where Medicare pays each doctor and hospital bill itself. Medicare pays more for the same care where wages and rents are high. This figure takes those price gaps out, so it shows how much care people used, not what it cost locally. It is not adjusted for how sick people are. It leaves out people in private Medicare Advantage plans.

CMS Medicare Geographic Variation Public Use File · CMS Medicare Geographic Variation PUF, national/state/county, all ages, TOT_MDCR_STDZD_PYMT_PC

Heating degree days

A measure of how cold the year was, as a total over its days. A day whose average temperature is 50°F counts 15 heating degree days, the degrees it fell short of 65°F. A day at 65°F or warmer counts none. Homes often need heat on days below 65°F, so more degree days mean more heating weather. NOAA estimates them from its monthly temperatures for each county. A state's figure is the average of its counties, each weighted by its land area. Alaska and Hawaii are not covered.

NOAA NCEI nClimDiv · NOAA NCEI nClimDiv climdiv-hddccy, sum of the 12 months; states, counties averaged by land area

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By Medicare spending per enrollee

Medicare spending per enrolleeHeating degree days
Highest
Miller County, GA27,1291,389
Hamilton County, KS24,4635,127
Greer County, OK22,5802,963
Oglala Lakota County, SD21,7996,604
Loving County, TX21,0632,074
Lowest
Judith Basin County, MT5,7548,125
Arthur County, NE6,3316,560
Boundary County, ID6,5767,988
Hanson County, SD6,6567,353
Powder River County, MT6,7127,315

By heating degree days

Medicare spending per enrolleeHeating degree days
Highest
Lake County, CO9,09411,328
San Juan County, CO8,51111,210
Summit County, CO8,38110,987
Sublette County, WY8,91610,945
Hinsdale County, CO11,32710,865
Lowest
Monroe County, FL11,50883
Miami-Dade County, FL16,63685
Broward County, FL14,972108
Palm Beach County, FL14,628167
Collier County, FL12,810167
States

By Medicare spending per enrollee

Medicare spending per enrolleeHeating degree days
Highest
Louisiana13,8051,414
Oklahoma13,6903,193
Florida13,686647
Mississippi13,4741,888
Texas13,2881,901
Lowest
Oregon9,0196,472
Montana9,1988,065
Vermont9,3157,215
Washington9,4336,379
Wyoming9,7618,670

By heating degree days

Medicare spending per enrolleeHeating degree days
Highest
North Dakota10,6028,901
Wyoming9,7618,670
Minnesota11,1728,233
Montana9,1988,065
Idaho9,9908,000
Lowest
Florida13,686647
Louisiana13,8051,414
Georgia11,7881,879
Mississippi13,4741,888
Texas13,2881,901
Metro areas

By Medicare spending per enrollee

Medicare spending per enrolleeHeating degree days
Highest
Bogalusa, LA17,9541,384
Rio Grande City-Roma, TX17,395471
Vernon, TX17,0932,529
Alice, TX16,760607
Durant, OK16,5362,328
Lowest
Sheridan, WY7,4958,167
Sandpoint, ID7,9157,352
Hood River, OR8,0486,859
Corvallis, OR8,1164,729
The Dalles, OR8,1706,068

By heating degree days

Medicare spending per enrolleeHeating degree days
Highest
Breckenridge, CO8,52111,117
Jackson, WY-ID9,06510,692
Edwards, CO9,4169,543
Evanston, WY-UT9,5379,512
Cody, WY9,7589,355
Lowest
Key West-Key Largo, FL11,50883
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL15,243122
Naples-Marco Island, FL12,810167
Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL12,647218
Port St. Lucie, FL13,578219

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 3,108 counties: the five with far more heating degree days than their Medicare spending per enrollee would suggest, and the five with far less.

Medicare spending per enrolleeHeating degree days
Above the line
Hamilton County, KS24,4635,127
Oglala Lakota County, SD21,7996,604
Faulk County, SD16,3378,077
Red Lake County, MN14,3409,155
Hinsdale County, CO11,32710,865
Below the line
Brewster County, TX8,2651,718
Presidio County, TX8,1971,876
King County, TX7,5402,348
Monroe County, FL11,50883
Edwards County, TX9,3031,503

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything-0.5063,089 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education-0.462the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size-0.460size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state-0.155each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Also holding winter sunshine equal-0.250compares counties that get the same sunlight in winter as well. If this is much weaker, part of the link is a difference between sunny and grey regions (more)
Giving bigger counties more weight-0.469the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 284 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states-0.211the link worked out inside each of 39 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting-0.480uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 4.7e-163. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 1.2e-7. The site tested 32,131 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 6.7e-162.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.73 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where Medicare spending per enrollee rose most, did heating degree daysmove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.

PeriodCountiesChange togetherWithin statesq
2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic3,108+0.11+0.030.457
2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years3,108-0.04+0.000.942

Over the main period, any link between the changes could easily be chance. How change is measured.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Medicare spending per enrollee and Heating degree days