placestats

Diagnosed diabetes and Years of potential life lost

Where Diagnosed diabetes is higher, Years of potential life lost tends to be higher. The link is moderate: +0.50 across 2,704 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it. It holds inside states too. Measured separately within each of 37 states, the middle value of the link is +0.67.

Holds after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Diagnosed diabetes

The estimated percentage of adults who have been told they have diabetes, excluding during pregnancy. It is adjusted so places with older or younger populations can be compared fairly. It is an estimate from a statistical model, not a direct count from a local survey.

CDC PLACES · PLACES DIABETES, age-adjusted

Years of potential life lost

Years of life lost before age 75, per 100,000 people. A death at 25 counts as fifty years lost and a death at 70 as five, so earlier deaths count for more.

County Health Rankings · County Health Rankings v001

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By diagnosed diabetes

Diagnosed diabetesYears of potential life lost
Highest
Oglala Lakota County, SD23.8%40,417
Todd County, SD22.9%34,850
Dimmit County, TX21.5%14,362
Zavala County, TX21.4%15,792
East Carroll Parish, LA21.3%13,141
Lowest
Douglas County, CO6%4,121
Chittenden County, VT6.2%5,480
Pitkin County, CO6.5%3,488
Broomfield County, CO6.5%4,980
Addison County, VT6.5%5,658

By years of potential life lost

Diagnosed diabetesYears of potential life lost
Highest
Buffalo County, SD18.7%46,418
Dewey County, SD18%41,916
Oglala Lakota County, SD23.8%40,417
Corson County, SD18.3%37,698
Sioux County, ND20.1%35,129
Lowest
San Juan County, WA7%3,315
Loudoun County, VA8.9%3,355
Pitkin County, CO6.5%3,488
Arlington County, VA8.5%3,513
Los Alamos County, NM6.7%3,583
States — Diagnosed diabetes is not published for states

By years of potential life lost

Diagnosed diabetesYears of potential life lost
Highest
Mississippi—13,328
West Virginia—13,324
New Mexico—12,363
Louisiana—12,185
Alabama—11,853
Lowest
Massachusetts—5,975
Hawaii—6,299
Utah—6,429
Minnesota—6,462
Rhode Island—6,529
Metro areas

By diagnosed diabetes

Diagnosed diabetesYears of potential life lost
Highest
Rio Grande City-Roma, TX20.5%9,793
Zapata, TX20.1%9,589
Clarksdale, MS19.5%22,826
Raymondville, TX19%11,567
Eagle Pass, TX18.1%10,667
Lowest
Burlington-South Burlington, VT6.59%5,904
Los Alamos, NM6.7%3,583
Boulder, CO6.7%4,571
Fort Collins-Loveland, CO6.9%5,743
Barre, VT7.1%7,124

By years of potential life lost

Diagnosed diabetesYears of potential life lost
Highest
Gallup, NM17.9%27,593
Clarksdale, MS19.5%22,826
Show Low, AZ12.3%21,728
Española, NM13.7%21,299
Selma, AL18.1%20,427
Lowest
Los Alamos, NM6.7%3,583
Corvallis, OR9.3%4,158
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA9.82%4,202
Bozeman, MT7.2%4,276
Edwards, CO7.5%4,321
Cities and towns — Years of potential life lost is not published for cities and towns

By diagnosed diabetes

Diagnosed diabetesYears of potential life lost
Highest
Cameron Park CDP, TX23.8%—
Doffing CDP, TX23.6%—
Mila Doce CDP, TX22.9%—
Prichard city, AL22.7%—
Benton Harbor city, MI22.6%—
Lowest
Shelburne CDP, VT5.2%—
Old Greenwich CDP, CT5.4%—
Cherry Hills Village city, CO5.4%—
Shorewood city, MN5.4%—
Staples CDP, CT5.5%—

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 2,712 counties: the five with far more years of potential life lost than their diagnosed diabetes would suggest, and the five with far less.

Diagnosed diabetesYears of potential life lost
Above the line
Buffalo County, SD18.7%46,418
Dewey County, SD18%41,916
Benson County, ND13.4%35,011
Roosevelt County, MT13.5%32,695
Kingman County, KS9.6%27,595
Below the line
Starr County, TX20.5%9,793
Zapata County, TX20.1%9,589
Presidio County, TX17.8%7,193
Hidalgo County, TX17.7%8,263
East Carroll Parish, LA21.3%13,141

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything+0.7162,704 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education+0.497the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size+0.497size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state+0.407each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight+0.315the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 258 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states+0.666the link worked out inside each of 37 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting+0.401uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 1.0e-168. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 0.000. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 1.1e-167.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.26 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where diagnosed diabetes rose most, did years of potential life lostmove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.

PeriodCountiesChange togetherWithin statesq
2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic————
2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years2,637+0.06+0.070.237

Measured over the nearest years published: Years of potential life lost: 2019–2022 for the 2019–2023 row.

Not measurable over the main period, so only the second period is shown. How change is measured.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Diagnosed diabetes and Years of potential life lost