Economic connectedness and Daily sunlight
Where Economic connectedness is higher, Daily sunlight tends to be lower. The link is weak: -0.33 across 3,011 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it. It holds inside states too. Measured separately within each of 40 states, the middle value of the link is -0.06.
Holds after adjusting
Every place, plotted
One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.
Loading every place…
What each measure is
Economic connectedness
How many of a low-income person's friends are high-income, compared with an even mix. One means their friends match the local mix of rich and poor. Below one means their friendships are more divided by income than that.
Social Capital Atlas · Opportunity Insights ec_county
Daily sunlight
The average amount of sunlight reaching the ground each day over the year, in kilowatt-hours per square metre. NASA estimates it from weather satellites: the satellites see the clouds, and a model of the air works out how much sunlight gets through them. The figures are for squares of land about 60 miles across, so nearby counties often share a value. Each county gets the square where its people live, around its center of population. Years before 2001 come from older satellites, which NASA adjusted to match the newer ones.
NASA POWER (Prediction Of Worldwide Energy Resources) · NASA POWER daily regional API, community RE, ALLSKY_SFC_SW_DWN
Highest and lowest
Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.
Counties
By economic connectedness
| Economic connectedness | Daily sunlight | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Rockingham County, NH | 1.36 | 3.72 |
| Douglas County, CO | 1.35 | 4.88 |
| San Francisco County, CA | 1.31 | 4.65 |
| Morgan County, UT | 1.29 | 4.71 |
| Madison County, ID | 1.28 | 4.42 |
| Lowest | ||
| Todd County, SD | 0.295 | 4.38 |
| Oglala Lakota County, SD | 0.33 | 4.44 |
| Terrell County, GA | 0.347 | 4.73 |
| Bullock County, AL | 0.355 | 4.64 |
| Allendale County, SC | 0.361 | 4.63 |
By daily sunlight
| Economic connectedness | Daily sunlight | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Yuma County, AZ | 0.662 | 5.97 |
| El Paso County, TX | 0.647 | 5.92 |
| Imperial County, CA | 0.732 | 5.91 |
| Cochise County, AZ | 0.797 | 5.89 |
| Santa Cruz County, AZ | 0.527 | 5.89 |
| Lowest | ||
| Chugach Census Area, AK | 1.06 | 2.12 |
| Nome Census Area, AK | 0.84 | 2.18 |
| North Slope Borough, AK | 1.09 | 2.25 |
| Kusilvak Census Area, AK | 0.642 | 2.33 |
| Sitka City and Borough, AK | 1.14 | 2.33 |
States — Economic connectedness is not published for states
By daily sunlight
| Economic connectedness | Daily sunlight | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Arizona | — | 5.81 |
| Hawaii | — | 5.69 |
| New Mexico | — | 5.54 |
| Nevada | — | 5.3 |
| California | — | 5.13 |
| Lowest | ||
| Alaska | — | 2.46 |
| Vermont | — | 3.43 |
| Maine | — | 3.53 |
| New Hampshire | — | 3.65 |
| Michigan | — | 3.69 |
Metro areas
By economic connectedness
| Economic connectedness | Daily sunlight | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Provo-Orem-Lehi, UT | 1.22 | 4.73 |
| Alexandria, MN | 1.18 | 4 |
| Laramie, WY | 1.17 | 4.66 |
| Hutchinson, MN | 1.16 | 4.04 |
| Ames, IA | 1.15 | 4.07 |
| Lowest | ||
| Lumberton, NC | 0.363 | 4.54 |
| Cordele, GA | 0.388 | 4.72 |
| Laurinburg, NC | 0.396 | 4.54 |
| Eufaula, AL-GA | 0.414 | 4.72 |
| Gallup, NM | 0.416 | 5.5 |
By daily sunlight
| Economic connectedness | Daily sunlight | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Yuma, AZ | 0.662 | 5.97 |
| El Paso, TX | 0.647 | 5.92 |
| El Centro, CA | 0.732 | 5.91 |
| Nogales, AZ | 0.527 | 5.89 |
| Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ | 0.797 | 5.89 |
| Lowest | ||
| Juneau, AK | 1.11 | 2.42 |
| Anchorage, AK | 1.04 | 2.48 |
| Ketchikan, AK | 0.985 | 2.49 |
| Fairbanks-College, AK | 1.1 | 2.5 |
| Barre, VT | 0.99 | 3.33 |
Counties furthest from the pattern
Compared with the straight line that best fits all 3,020 counties: the five with far more daily sunlight than their economic connectedness would suggest, and the five with far less.
| Economic connectedness | Daily sunlight | |
|---|---|---|
| Above the line | ||
| Maui County, HI | 1.09 | 5.86 |
| Honolulu County, HI | 1.12 | 5.7 |
| Kauai County, HI | 1.06 | 5.7 |
| Presidio County, TX | 0.848 | 5.87 |
| Cochise County, AZ | 0.797 | 5.89 |
| Below the line | ||
| Kusilvak Census Area, AK | 0.642 | 2.33 |
| Nome Census Area, AK | 0.84 | 2.18 |
| Chugach Census Area, AK | 1.06 | 2.12 |
| Aleutians West Census Area, AK | 0.833 | 2.34 |
| Bethel Census Area, AK | 0.763 | 2.4 |
Two series, one county
Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.
Loading…
Every version of the link
Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.
| Before adjusting for anything | -0.304 | 3,011 counties reporting both |
| After adjusting for density, income and education | -0.328 | the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is |
| Also adjusting for population size | -0.311 | size taken out as well as density |
| Also comparing only within each state | -0.064 | each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states |
| Also holding winter sunshine equal | — | compares counties that get the same sunlight in winter as well. If this is much weaker, part of the link is a difference between sunny and grey regions (more) |
| Giving bigger counties more weight | -0.381 | the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 286 equally weighted counties |
| Middle value inside single states | -0.064 | the link worked out inside each of 40 states with at least 20 counties reporting |
| Using ranks, after adjusting | -0.361 | uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link |
How much to believe it
Could it be chance?
The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 3.4e-76. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 1.9e-5. The site tested 32,131 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 2.9e-75.
Do nearby places look alike?
Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.90 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.
Did they change together?
Not measurable: at least one of these is published for too few of the years a change needs (2014–2019 or 2019–2023), or for too few counties in both.
Related pairs
- Summer daily high and Daily sunlight — +0.78
- Days of 90°F or hotter and Daily sunlight — +0.74
- Average temperature and Daily sunlight — +0.72
- Heating degree days and Daily sunlight — -0.70
- Cooling degree days and Daily sunlight — +0.70
- Housing insecurity and Economic connectedness — -0.65
- Food insecurity and Economic connectedness — -0.64
- Returns claiming the earned income credit and Economic connectedness — -0.64
Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Economic connectedness and Daily sunlight