placestats

Economy score and Average test score

Across 2,756 counties, Economy score and Average test score have a link of +0.61, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). But compare places with the same population density, income and education, and a weak link of +0.20 remains. Most of the first figure came from both measures following how urban, rich and educated a place is, not from a link with each other.

Mostly gone after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Economy score

Four income measures from four agencies: income per person, middle household income (an estimate from a statistical model), personal income per person, and average adjusted gross income on tax returns. Read it as four ways of measuring income, not as a broad economic summary. It moves very closely with middle household income (a link of 0.91 on a scale where 1 is perfect), and the site already adjusts for that. So a link with this score and a link with income are close to the same question.

· derived from 4 measures (ACS, BEA, IRS, SAIPE)

Average test score

How far above or below the national average children here score on tests, in grade levels. Minus one means about a year behind. It reflects everything in children's lives, not only their schools.

Stanford Education Data Archive · SEDA cs_mn_avg_ol

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By economy score

Economy scoreAverage test score
Highest
Teton County, WY5.780.299
Pitkin County, CO4.810.268
Summit County, UT4.730.337
Marin County, CA4.440.329
San Mateo County, CA4.380.087
Lowest
Kusilvak Census Area, AK-1.28-1.31
Oglala Lakota County, SD-1.19-1.12
Wheeler County, GA-1.07-0.319
Claiborne County, MS-1.07-0.61
Starr County, TX-1.04-0.185

By average test score

Economy scoreAverage test score
Highest
Skagway Municipality, AK2.080.738
Forsyth County, GA2.890.713
Norfolk County, MA3.420.652
Morris County, NJ3.470.627
Williamson County, TN3.740.621
Lowest
Kusilvak Census Area, AK-1.28-1.31
Bethel Census Area, AK0.151-1.27
Todd County, SD-0.846-1.21
St. Helena Parish, LA-0.0422-1.16
Sioux County, ND-0.607-1.15
Metro areas

By economy score

Economy scoreAverage test score
Highest
Jackson, WY-ID6.150.0511
Heber, UT4.360.231
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA4.150.175
Naples-Marco Island, FL3.860.0929
Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT3.850.281
Lowest
Rio Grande City-Roma, TX-2.7-0.185
Zapata, TX-2.58-0.398
Gallup, NM-2.29-0.547
Deming, NM-2.08-0.619
Raymondville, TX-2.08-0.324

By average test score

Economy scoreAverage test score
Highest
Vineyard Haven, MA2.450.583
North Platte, NE0.3390.553
Los Alamos, NM2.770.543
Sheridan, WY1.170.536
Lewisburg, PA0.1450.521
Lowest
Forrest City, AR-1.91-0.774
Shawano, WI-0.286-0.756
Selma, AL-1.44-0.724
Clarksdale, MS-1.36-0.69
Eufaula, AL-GA-1.48-0.647

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 2,772 counties: the five with far more average test score than their economy score would suggest, and the five with far less.

Economy scoreAverage test score
Above the line
Fulton County, AR-0.3870.29
Logan County, NE1.010.553
Hooker County, NE0.4960.435
Bent County, CO-0.6910.182
Skagway Municipality, AK2.080.738
Below the line
North Slope Borough, AK2.12-0.952
Bethel Census Area, AK0.151-1.27
St. Helena Parish, LA-0.0422-1.16
Thurston County, NE0.637-1.02
Northwest Arctic Borough, AK0.844-0.973

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything+0.6132,756 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education+0.205the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size+0.212size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state+0.175each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight-0.010the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 267 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states+0.621the link worked out inside each of 38 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting+0.188uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 1.7e-27. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 0.000. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 6.5e-27.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.46 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

Not measurable: at least one of these is published for too few of the years a change needs (2014–2019 or 2019–2023), or for too few counties in both.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Economy score and Average test score