placestats

Years of potential life lost and Mean adjusted gross income per return

Across 2,882 counties, Years of potential life lost and Mean adjusted gross income per return have a link of -0.53, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). But compare places with the same population density, income and education, and what is left could easily be chance. Most of the first figure came from both measures following how urban, rich and educated a place is, not from a link with each other.

Mostly gone after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Years of potential life lost

Years of life lost before age 75, per 100,000 people. A death at 25 counts as fifty years lost and a death at 70 as five, so earlier deaths count for more.

County Health Rankings · County Health Rankings v001

Mean adjusted gross income per return

Average adjusted gross income (income after a few deductions, as reported to the IRS) per tax return. Business and farm losses are subtracted. It counts only people who file, and people who earn too little to have to file are missing, which makes the poorest places look better off.

IRS Statistics of Income · IRS SOI A00100 / N1

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By years of potential life lost

Years of potential life lostMean adjusted gross income per return
Highest
Buffalo County, SD46,418$40,348
Dewey County, SD41,916$57,480
Oglala Lakota County, SD40,417$40,977
Corson County, SD37,698$46,904
Sioux County, ND35,129$46,466
Lowest
San Juan County, WA3,315$124,210
Loudoun County, VA3,355$156,270
Pitkin County, CO3,488$280,730
Arlington County, VA3,513$159,170
Los Alamos County, NM3,583$138,590

By mean adjusted gross income per return

Years of potential life lostMean adjusted gross income per return
Highest
Teton County, WY4,174$509,150
Pitkin County, CO3,488$280,730
Summit County, UT4,285$265,720
New York County, NY4,960$257,310
Blaine County, ID4,707$252,880
Lowest
Kusilvak Census Area, AK24,556$27,083
Holmes County, MS22,286$37,015
Zapata County, TX9,589$38,812
Quitman County, MS18,894$39,003
Starr County, TX9,793$39,523
States

By years of potential life lost

Years of potential life lostMean adjusted gross income per return
Highest
Mississippi13,328$65,732
West Virginia13,324$68,201
New Mexico12,363$69,650
Louisiana12,185$73,396
Alabama11,853$77,740
Lowest
Massachusetts5,975$121,200
Hawaii6,299$84,323
Utah6,429$94,519
Minnesota6,462$94,470
Rhode Island6,529$87,394

By mean adjusted gross income per return

Years of potential life lostMean adjusted gross income per return
Highest
District of Columbia9,241$143,630
Connecticut6,703$121,890
Massachusetts5,975$121,200
Washington6,781$114,940
New Jersey6,562$112,230
Lowest
Mississippi13,328$65,732
West Virginia13,324$68,201
New Mexico12,363$69,650
Louisiana12,185$73,396
Kentucky11,687$73,748
Metro areas

By years of potential life lost

Years of potential life lostMean adjusted gross income per return
Highest
Gallup, NM27,593$44,629
Clarksdale, MS22,826$52,539
Show Low, AZ21,728$57,962
Española, NM21,299$56,448
Selma, AL20,427$50,296
Lowest
Los Alamos, NM3,583$138,590
Corvallis, OR4,158$90,239
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA4,202$211,950
Bozeman, MT4,276$117,780
Edwards, CO4,321$140,940

By mean adjusted gross income per return

Years of potential life lostMean adjusted gross income per return
Highest
Jackson, WY-ID5,108$387,550
Naples-Marco Island, FL6,600$224,460
Hailey, ID5,174$220,660
Heber, UT4,487$220,380
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA4,202$211,950
Lowest
Zapata, TX9,589$38,812
Rio Grande City-Roma, TX9,793$39,523
Deming, NM13,152$41,040
Raymondville, TX11,567$43,300
Gallup, NM27,593$44,629

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 2,890 counties: the five with far more mean adjusted gross income per return than their years of potential life lost would suggest, and the five with far less.

Years of potential life lostMean adjusted gross income per return
Above the line
Teton County, WY4,174$509,150
Pitkin County, CO3,488$280,730
Summit County, UT4,285$265,720
New York County, NY4,960$257,310
Blaine County, ID4,707$252,880
Below the line
Zapata County, TX9,589$38,812
Starr County, TX9,793$39,523
Wheeler County, GA8,896$44,682
Hudspeth County, TX9,663$43,241
Harrison County, MO7,831$49,556

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything-0.5322,882 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education+0.011the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size+0.011size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state+0.001each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight+0.079the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 281 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states-0.623the link worked out inside each of 39 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting-0.120uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 0.560. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 0.750. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 0.600.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.15 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where years of potential life lost rose most, did mean adjusted gross income per returnmove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.

PeriodCountiesChange togetherWithin statesq
2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic2,789+0.01-0.030.289
2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years2,795-0.03-0.010.853

Measured over the nearest years published: Years of potential life lost: 2019–2022 for the 2019–2023 row.

Over the main period, any link between the changes could easily be chance. How change is measured.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Years of potential life lost and Mean adjusted gross income per return