placestats

Child mortality and Median household income (model-based)

Across 1,734 counties, Child mortality and Median household income (model-based) have a link of -0.59, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). But compare places with the same population density, income and education, and what is left could easily be chance. Most of the first figure came from both measures following how urban, rich and educated a place is, not from a link with each other.

Mostly gone after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Child mortality

Deaths of children under 18 per 100,000 children.

County Health Rankings · County Health Rankings v128

Median household income (model-based)

The income of the middle household. It is an estimate from a statistical model that combines survey answers with tax and government-program records.

Census SAIPE · Census SAIPE SAEMHI_PT

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By child mortality

Child mortalityMedian household income (model-based)
Highest
Kusilvak Census Area, AK274$42,029
Oglala Lakota County, SD208$42,791
Northwest Arctic Borough, AK202$78,619
Bethel Census Area, AK200$62,140
Holmes County, MS192$30,542
Lowest
Putnam County, NY19$120,930
Benton County, OR19.1$74,800
Kendall County, IL19.3$114,610
Washington County, RI20.8$101,750
Norfolk County, MA21.2$123,450

By median household income (model-based)

Child mortalityMedian household income (model-based)
Highest
Loudoun County, VA26.1$173,660
Santa Clara County, CA27.9$154,570
San Mateo County, CA26.1$151,000
Douglas County, CO31.5$144,810
Fairfax County, VA30.2$141,350
Lowest
Holmes County, MS192$30,542
Humphreys County, MS174$31,538
Leflore County, MS118$33,945
Coahoma County, MS90$35,552
Bell County, KY91.1$35,566
States

By child mortality

Child mortalityMedian household income (model-based)
Highest
Mississippi86.5$54,386
Louisiana78.6$58,273
Arkansas73$58,748
Alaska72.9$88,696
Alabama72.7$62,248
Lowest
Massachusetts30.4$99,750
New Jersey33.9$99,716
New Hampshire34.6$97,031
Rhode Island34.7$83,518
Vermont36.3$80,626

By median household income (model-based)

Child mortalityMedian household income (model-based)
Highest
District of Columbia65.3$104,640
Massachusetts30.4$99,750
New Jersey33.9$99,716
Maryland51.5$98,568
New Hampshire34.6$97,031
Lowest
Mississippi86.5$54,386
West Virginia60.7$55,875
Louisiana78.6$58,273
Arkansas73$58,748
Kentucky60.1$61,099
Metro areas — Median household income (model-based) is not published for metro areas

By child mortality

Child mortalityMedian household income (model-based)
Highest
Greenville, MS143—
Uvalde, TX139—
Vernon, TX137—
Rockingham, NC137—
Minden, LA135—
Lowest
Corvallis, OR19.1—
Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA21.2—
Putnam, CT21.6—
Amherst Town-Northampton, MA22.8—
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA27.5—

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 1,735 counties: the five with far more median household income (model-based) than their child mortality would suggest, and the five with far less.

Child mortalityMedian household income (model-based)
Above the line
Loudoun County, VA26.1$173,660
Santa Clara County, CA27.9$154,570
Northwest Arctic Borough, AK202$78,619
San Mateo County, CA26.1$151,000
Douglas County, CO31.5$144,810
Below the line
Starr County, TX46.2$38,824
Bronx County, NY45$46,894
Pike County, KY47.9$46,402
Mingo County, WV67.5$38,358
Dunklin County, MO50.4$45,570

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything-0.5891,734 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education-0.055the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size-0.040size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state-0.087each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight-0.014the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 260 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states-0.560the link worked out inside each of 31 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting-0.086uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 0.022. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 0.180. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 0.029.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.09 (p = 0.001). Once the adjustment is made, little map pattern is left.

Did they change together?

The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where child mortality rose most, did median household income (model-based)move too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.

PeriodCountiesChange togetherWithin statesq
2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic1,436-0.03-0.040.462
2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years1,484+0.02-0.000.983

Measured over the nearest years published: Child mortality: 2013–2019 for the 2014–2019 row; Child mortality: 2019–2022 for the 2019–2023 row.

Over the main period, any link between the changes could easily be chance. How change is measured.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Child mortality and Median household income (model-based)