placestats

Share Black, not Hispanic and Child mortality

Where Share Black, not Hispanic is higher, Child mortality tends to be higher. The link is moderate: +0.56 across 1,620 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it. It holds inside states too. Measured separately within each of 30 states, the middle value of the link is +0.30.

Holds after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Share Black, not Hispanic

The percentage of residents who are Black or African American alone and not Hispanic. The middle county is under 2%, and this group is one of the most concentrated in the data. A handful of counties in the Mississippi Delta and the Black Belt are above 80%.

Census ACS 5-year · ACS table B03002_004, divided by total population

Child mortality

Deaths of children under 18 per 100,000 children.

County Health Rankings · County Health Rankings v128

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By share Black, not Hispanic

Share Black, not HispanicChild mortality
Highest
Holmes County, MS82.4%192
Tunica County, MS79.3%128
Humphreys County, MS78.8%174
Coahoma County, MS75.9%90
Petersburg city, VA74.6%168
Lowest
Big Horn County, MT0%154
Susquehanna County, PA0.201%53.2
Lake County, MT0.209%79.8
Flathead County, MT0.231%58.5
Ravalli County, MT0.236%61.6

By child mortality

Share Black, not HispanicChild mortality
Highest
Bethel Census Area, AK1.15%200
Holmes County, MS82.4%192
Nome Census Area, AK1.04%178
Humphreys County, MS78.8%174
Atkinson County, GA15.2%171
Lowest
Putnam County, NY2.95%19
Benton County, OR1.21%19.1
Kendall County, IL8.23%19.3
Washington County, RI1.17%20.8
Norfolk County, MA6.93%21.2
States

By share Black, not Hispanic

Share Black, not HispanicChild mortality
Highest
District of Columbia42.5%65.3
Mississippi36.9%86.5
Georgia31%61.2
Louisiana30.8%78.6
Maryland29.2%51.5
Lowest
Montana0.474%62.9
Idaho0.686%49.1
Wyoming0.815%61.6
Utah1.04%47
Vermont1.16%36.3

By child mortality

Share Black, not HispanicChild mortality
Highest
Mississippi36.9%86.5
Louisiana30.8%78.6
Arkansas14.8%73
Alaska2.97%72.9
Alabama25.9%72.7
Lowest
Massachusetts6.51%30.4
New Jersey12.3%33.9
New Hampshire1.38%34.6
Rhode Island5.04%34.7
Vermont1.16%36.3
Metro areas

By share Black, not Hispanic

Share Black, not HispanicChild mortality
Highest
Clarksdale, MS75.9%90
Greenville, MS72%143
Selma, AL70.3%73.4
Greenwood, MS63.9%118
Cleveland, MS63.2%112
Lowest
Pierre, SD0%103
Gardnerville Ranchos, NV-CA0%41.4
Evanston, WY-UT0%65
Kalispell, MT0.231%58.5
Taos, NM0.258%86.9

By child mortality

Share Black, not HispanicChild mortality
Highest
Greenville, MS72%143
Vernon, TX6.06%137
Rockingham, NC31.7%137
Minden, LA33.3%135
Blytheville, AR34.8%126
Lowest
Corvallis, OR1.21%19.1
Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA4.24%21.2
Putnam, CT1.68%21.6
Amherst Town-Northampton, MA2.2%22.8
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA0.748%27.5
Cities and towns — Child mortality is not published for cities and towns

By share Black, not Hispanic

Share Black, not HispanicChild mortality
Highest
Merrydale CDP, LA97.3%—
East St. Louis city, IL94%—
Warrensville Heights city, OH92.4%—
Panthersville CDP, GA92.1%—
Silver Hill CDP, MD91.6%—
Lowest
Salida city, CO0%—
Roxborough Park CDP, CO0%—
Redlands CDP, CO0%—
Milliken town, CO0%—
Mead town, CO0%—
ZIP codes — Child mortality is not published for ZIP codes

By share Black, not Hispanic

Share Black, not HispanicChild mortality
Highest
ZIP 36610 (Prichard city, AL)97.2%—
ZIP 62207 (Centreville city, IL)97%—
ZIP 70812 (Merrydale CDP, LA)97%—
ZIP 36617 (Mobile city, AL)96.6%—
ZIP 62205 (East St. Louis city, IL)96.5%—
Lowest
ZIP 08867 (Hunterdon County, NJ)0%—
ZIP 08551 (Hunterdon County, NJ)0%—
ZIP 08251 (Villas CDP, NJ)0%—
ZIP 07739 (Little Silver borough, NJ)0%—
ZIP 07072 (Carlstadt borough, NJ)0%—

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 1,620 counties: the five with far more child mortality than their share Black, not Hispanic would suggest, and the five with far less.

Share Black, not HispanicChild mortality
Above the line
Bethel Census Area, AK1.15%200
Nome Census Area, AK1.04%178
Atkinson County, GA15.2%171
Big Horn County, MT0%154
Red River County, TX16.4%166
Below the line
Williamsburg County, SC63.9%63.9
Prince George's County, MD59%61
Douglas County, GA48.5%52.2
Kings County, NY27.5%34.9
Dallas County, AL70.3%73.4

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything+0.5511,620 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education+0.565the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size+0.555size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state+0.455each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight+0.635the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 255 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states+0.300the link worked out inside each of 30 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting+0.429uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 3.3e-137. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 9.1e-17. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 3.1e-136.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.09 (p = 0.001). Once the adjustment is made, little map pattern is left.

Did they change together?

The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where share black, not hispanic rose most, did child mortalitymove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.

PeriodCountiesChange togetherWithin statesq
2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic1,353+0.04+0.030.325
2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years1,395-0.09-0.030.523

Measured over the nearest years published: Child mortality: 2013–2019 for the 2014–2019 row; Child mortality: 2019–2022 for the 2019–2023 row.

Over the main period, any link between the changes could easily be chance. How change is measured.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Share Black, not Hispanic and Child mortality