placestats

Child mortality and Injury deaths

Where Child mortality is higher, Injury deaths tends to be higher. The link is weak: +0.38 across 1,725 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it. It holds inside states too. Measured separately within each of 31 states, the middle value of the link is +0.57.

Holds after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Child mortality

Deaths of children under 18 per 100,000 children.

County Health Rankings · County Health Rankings v128

Injury deaths

Deaths from injury per 100,000 people: overdoses, crashes, falls, suicides and homicides together.

County Health Rankings · County Health Rankings v135

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By child mortality

By injury deaths

States

By child mortality

Child mortalityInjury deaths
Highest
Mississippi86.5106
Louisiana78.6114
Arkansas7391.4
Alaska72.9108
Alabama72.793.4
Lowest
Massachusetts30.475.1
New Jersey33.966.1
New Hampshire34.688.9
Rhode Island34.786.9
Vermont36.3102

By injury deaths

Child mortalityInjury deaths
Highest
West Virginia60.7146
New Mexico59.3129
Tennessee65.7115
Louisiana78.6114
District of Columbia65.3113
Lowest
New York37.460
California38.262.9
Nebraska50.965
Hawaii44.565.1
New Jersey33.966.1
Metro areas

By child mortality

Child mortalityInjury deaths
Highest
Greenville, MS143143
Uvalde, TX13993.1
Vernon, TX13791.5
Rockingham, NC137128
Minden, LA13597.4
Lowest
Corvallis, OR19.157.2
Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA21.278.5
Amherst Town-Northampton, MA22.865.7
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA27.578.5
Keene, NH27.587.4

By injury deaths

Child mortalityInjury deaths
Highest
Española, NM60.5213
Gallup, NM65.4201
Beckley, WV67.3191
Show Low, AZ82.5188
Charleston, WV63.6186
Lowest
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX41.332.7
Brownsville-Harlingen, TX45.436.9
Rio Grande City-Roma, TX46.240.3
Eagle Pass, TX55.342.5
Storm Lake, IA58.443.7

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 1,726 counties: the five with far more injury deaths than their child mortality would suggest, and the five with far less.

Child mortalityInjury deaths
Above the line
Apache County, AZ85.6239
Logan County, WV59.6219
Rio Arriba County, NM60.5213
Cabell County, WV55.3201
Todd County, SD153268
Below the line
Telfair County, GA15166.4
Falls County, TX12577.7
Humphreys County, MS174113
Adams County, IN10365.3
Willacy County, TX8553.6

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything+0.5821,725 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education+0.375the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size+0.384size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state+0.416each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight+0.474the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 255 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states+0.568the link worked out inside each of 31 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting+0.327uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 1.4e-58. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 3.1e-8. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 8.4e-58.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.45 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where child mortality rose most, did injury deathsmove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.

PeriodCountiesChange togetherWithin statesq
2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic1,435+0.07+0.080.014
2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years1,484+0.22+0.171.2e-5

Measured over the nearest years published: Child mortality: 2013–2019 for the 2014–2019 row; Injury deaths: 2013–2019 for the 2014–2019 row; Child mortality: 2019–2022 for the 2019–2023 row; Injury deaths: 2019–2022 for the 2019–2023 row.

In counties where one changed more, the other tended to move the same way, compared with other counties in the same state (r = +0.08). The same holds in the second period. How change is measured.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Child mortality and Injury deaths