placestats

PISA maths vs. Religious attendance

Holds up after adjusting for income

A country is not a person. Countries where more people are counted as belonging to this group also tend to differ on the other measure, and that is all. It does not follow that the people in the group are the people with the different score. Making that leap is called the ecological fallacy: reading a pattern across places as a fact about individual people. It is the most common misuse of this kind of data. Religion also varies strongly with region, history and national income, so much of what looks religious here is really those. That is what the adjusted figures are for. The religion shares are estimates for two years only, and the survey questions are asked in rounds that can be ten years apart.

Across 75 countries, PISA maths and Religious attendance rise and fall together at r = -0.61 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). Comparing only countries with similar income (GDP per person) shrinks it to -0.41 (q = 0.049, allowing for the many pairs tested). Much of the first figure is that both measures rise with national income, but a moderate negative link remains.

Comparing countries across the middle half of religious attendance, 16.4% to 47.3% of respondents, pisa maths is worse by 52.7 PISA points at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 22.3 PISA points.

Link before adjusting (r)-0.611p = 6.0e-9 · 75 countries
After adjusting for national income-0.406p = 0.000 · likely range [-0.58, -0.20]
p, allowing for regions0.001standard error 0.044 · 5 regions
Check for luck (q)0.049across 12,497 pairs

How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.

PISA maths · PISA pointslink with income +0.79 · high
Religious attendance · % of respondentslink with income -0.66 · high

Both of these rise and fall closely with national income, so a strong link between them before adjusting was close to certain. Read the adjusted figure, not the first one.

“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.

Every country as a dot

PISA maths · PISA points →Religious attendance · % of respondents →3445756.48%81.8%Albania: 368 PISA points, 14.8% of respondentsArgentina: 378 PISA points, 36% of respondentsAustralia: 487 PISA points, 17.5% of respondentsAustria: 487 PISA points, 26.8% of respondentsBelgium: 489 PISA points, 18.9% of respondentsBulgaria: 417 PISA points, 17.3% of respondentsBosnia and Herzegovina: 406 PISA points, 43.3% of respondentsBelarus: 472 PISA points, 19.9% of respondentsBrazil: 379 PISA points, 59.6% of respondentsCanada: 497 PISA points, 16.4% of respondentsSwitzerland: 508 PISA points, 16.2% of respondentsChile: 412 PISA points, 31% of respondentsColombia: 383 PISA points, 58.3% of respondentsCyprus: 418 PISA points, 50.2% of respondentsCzechia: 487 PISA points, 10% of respondentsGermany: 475 PISA points, 19.2% of respondentsDenmark: 489 PISA points, 6.48% of respondentsAlgeria: 360 PISA points, 53.5% of respondentsSpain: 473 PISA points, 22.8% of respondentsEstonia: 510 PISA points, 8% of respondentsFinland: 484 PISA points, 11.1% of respondentsFrance: 474 PISA points, 12.4% of respondentsUnited Kingdom: 489 PISA points, 16.1% of respondentsGeorgia: 390 PISA points, 33.7% of respondentsGreece: 430 PISA points, 44.5% of respondentsGuatemala: 344 PISA points, 63.4% of respondentsHong Kong SAR, China: 540 PISA points, 16.1% of respondentsCroatia: 463 PISA points, 33.7% of respondentsHungary: 473 PISA points, 17.3% of respondentsIndonesia: 366 PISA points, 77.8% of respondentsIreland: 492 PISA points, 53.3% of respondentsIceland: 459 PISA points, 8.48% of respondentsItaly: 471 PISA points, 40.7% of respondentsJordan: 361 PISA points, 56.4% of respondentsJapan: 536 PISA points, 12.3% of respondentsKazakhstan: 425 PISA points, 32.8% of respondentsKorea, Rep.: 527 PISA points, 22.8% of respondentsLebanon: 393 PISA points, 53.3% of respondentsLithuania: 475 PISA points, 30% of respondentsLuxembourg: 483 PISA points, 22.7% of respondentsLatvia: 483 PISA points, 12.8% of respondentsMacao SAR, China: 552 PISA points, 9.5% of respondentsMorocco: 365 PISA points, 58.1% of respondentsMoldova: 414 PISA points, 27.8% of respondentsMexico: 395 PISA points, 60.6% of respondentsNorth Macedonia: 389 PISA points, 40.1% of respondentsMalta: 466 PISA points, 81.5% of respondentsMontenegro: 406 PISA points, 36.7% of respondentsMongolia: 425 PISA points, 14.1% of respondentsMalaysia: 409 PISA points, 60.3% of respondentsNetherlands: 493 PISA points, 14.3% of respondentsNorway: 468 PISA points, 11.8% of respondentsNew Zealand: 479 PISA points, 16.8% of respondentsPeru: 391 PISA points, 57.1% of respondentsPhilippines: 355 PISA points, 81.8% of respondentsPoland: 489 PISA points, 64.3% of respondentsPortugal: 472 PISA points, 29.7% of respondentsWest Bank and Gaza: 366 PISA points, 58.5% of respondentsRomania: 428 PISA points, 46% of respondentsRussian Federation: 488 PISA points, 16.3% of respondentsSingapore: 575 PISA points, 42.6% of respondentsSerbia: 440 PISA points, 20.1% of respondentsSlovak Republic: 464 PISA points, 36.1% of respondentsSlovenia: 485 PISA points, 23.8% of respondentsSweden: 482 PISA points, 9.65% of respondentsThailand: 394 PISA points, 38.1% of respondentsTrinidad and Tobago: 417 PISA points, 57.8% of respondentsTunisia: 367 PISA points, 43.5% of respondentsTurkiye: 453 PISA points, 39.5% of respondentsUkraine: 441 PISA points, 29.1% of respondentsUruguay: 409 PISA points, 13.3% of respondentsUnited States: 465 PISA points, 39% of respondentsUzbekistan: 364 PISA points, 41.7% of respondentsViet Nam: 469 PISA points, 17.2% of respondentsKosovo: 355 PISA points, 48.7% of respondentsALBGTMHKGIDNJPNMACMLTMNGPHLPOLSGPURY

best-fit line line after adjusting

Four ways to measure the link

MethodrpCountries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted-0.6116.0e-975
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted-0.6321.2e-975
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income-0.4060.00075
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income-0.4190.00075

The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 75 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: +0.205 (a minus sign means it grew).

How solid is it?

Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from -0.454 (without SGP) to -0.370 (without VNM). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: SGP (-0.049).

Within each region

Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.

nr
East Asia & Pacific13-0.65
Europe & Central Asia44-0.36

By income third

If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.

nr
Poorest third25-0.62
Middle third25-0.47
Richest third25-0.29

By largest religious group

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Christians49-0.48
Muslims14+0.02

Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = -0.406 after dropping 0 countries.

Two series, one country

Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.

Loading…

Over time, within countries

Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 0years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.

Not enough history inside each country to look at this over time. That needs countries measured for several years in a row, and at least one of these measures is measured too rarely.

The data


PISA points
% of respondents		Years
Singapore SGP57542.6%2022
Macao SAR, China MAC5529.5%2022
Hong Kong SAR, China HKG54016.1%2022
Japan JPN53612.3%2022
Korea, Rep. KOR52722.8%2022
Estonia EST5108%2022
Switzerland CHE50816.2%2022
Canada CAN49716.4%2022
Netherlands NLD49314.3%2022
Ireland IRL49253.3%2022, 2010
Belgium BEL48918.9%2022, 2010
Denmark DNK4896.48%2022
United Kingdom GBR48916.1%2022
Poland POL48964.3%2022
Russian Federation RUS48816.3%2018, 2022

OECD databases as named on each indicator: PISA, Social Expenditure Database (SOCX), Income Distribution Database, Development Assistance Committee statistics, Family Database, Government at a Glance, Corporate Tax Statistics, employment and environment statistics
Haerpfer, C. et al., World Values Survey; EVS, European Values Study

Sources

PISA maths

PISA mean mathematics score

OECD · via Our World in Data · CC BY 4.0 (OECD terms and conditions) · updated annual, except the snapshots noted per indicator

The average score of 15-year-olds on the same test in every country taking part. It is scaled so the OECD average in the starting year was 500, with a standard deviation (a typical gap between students) of 100. Held every three years. The 2021 round was held in 2022, and the OECD says it can still be compared with earlier rounds despite the pandemic. The three subjects are treated as measuring the same thing. Their links with each other are above 0.95, and that close match is a fact about the test, not about schooling.

Religious attendance

Share attending religious services frequently

World Values Survey Association and European Values Study · via Our World in Data · Free for non-commercial use with attribution · updated irregular (survey waves, roughly every 5 years)

The share who attend religious services at least once a month. This measures taking part, not belief or belonging to a religion. Those are three different things, and they can differ sharply. A country can be almost entirely religious by belonging and yet rarely attend anything. No "better" direction is set, and none could be defended. Attendance describes how people live. It does not show whether a country is doing well, and calling either end the good one would be a claim this site has no basis for. The survey runs in waves, not every year, so data for each country are sparse and uneven.

How this was computed

Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2010–2022. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 5 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 12,497 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated DYB 2024. How the country data works · explore PISA maths and Religious attendance

This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that PISA maths changes Religious attendance, or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.

More links with PISA maths or Religious attendance