Across 199 countries, Fertility rate and Population 65+ rise and fall together at r = -0.73 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). Comparing only countries with similar income (GDP per person) shrinks it to -0.33 (q = 0.016, allowing for the many pairs tested). Much of the first figure is that both measures rise with national income, but a weak negative link remains.
Comparing countries across the middle half of population 65+, 4.05% to 17% of population, fertility rate is 1.58 births per woman lower at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 0.588 births per woman.
Link before adjusting (r)-0.731p = 1.6e-34 · 199 countries
After adjusting for national income-0.330p = 2.1e-6 · likely range [-0.45, -0.20]
p, allowing for regions0.041standard error 0.127 · 7 regions
Check for luck (q)0.016across 12,497 pairs
How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.
Fertility rate · births per womanlink with income -0.81 · proxy
Population 65+ · % of populationlink with income +0.76 · high
Both of these rise and fall closely with national income, so a strong link between them before adjusting was close to certain. Read the adjusted figure, not the first one.
“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.
Every country as a dot
best-fit line line after adjusting
Four ways to measure the link
Method
r
p
Countries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted
-0.731
1.6e-34
199
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted
-0.849
2.2e-56
199
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income
-0.330
2.1e-6
199
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income
-0.610
1.4e-21
199
The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 199 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: +0.401 (a minus sign means it grew).
How solid is it?
Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from -0.343 (without COD) to -0.313 (without GUY). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: GUY (+0.017).
Within each region
Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.
n
r
East Asia & Pacific
31
-0.46
Europe & Central Asia
53
-0.62
Latin America & Caribbean
38
-0.56
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
22
-0.37
Sub-Saharan Africa
46
-0.50
By income third
If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.
n
r
Poorest third
67
-0.62
Middle third
66
-0.55
Richest third
66
-0.54
By largest religious group
Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.
n
r
Christians
112
-0.33
Muslims
50
-0.52
By last european coloniser
Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.
n
r
France
25
-0.67
Never a European colony
21
-0.58
Spain
20
-0.70
United Kingdom
63
-0.35
Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = -0.400 after dropping 5 countries.
Two series, one country
Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.
Loading…
Over time, within countries
Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 35years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.
The link also shows up within countries over time (r = +0.434). It holds even when looking only at changes from one year to the next (r = +0.144). This is the strongest kind of evidence available here: it holds when each country is compared only with itself, and it is not just a product of shared trends.
Across countries (adjusted)-0.330for comparison
Within countries-0.264each country vs itself
…and vs the same year elsewhere+0.434q = 0.000 · 217 countries
Year-on-year changes+0.144q = 0.000
The direction flips. Comparing each country only with itself gives -0.26. Also taking out what happened to the whole world each year gives +0.43. So the first figure was picking up a trend both measures share with worldwide progress, not a link between them.
Read with care.
The association is much weaker in year-on-year changes than in levels, which points to shared country-specific trends.
7,595 country-years (one country in one year), 217 countries, 1990–2024, about 35 years each on average. Share of the variation that happens within countries over time: 11% for Fertility rate, 12% for Population 65+. The margins of error allow for each country appearing many times, and for each year’s value being close to the year before.
Year-to-year changes are a cautious test, not a final answer. Looking only at changes from one year to the next removes each country’s own trends. But it also makes measurement mistakes louder, which pulls the results toward zero. A near-zero result here is weak evidence of no link, not proof.
With one measure years behind the other
Same year (lag 0): +0.434. A peak away from zero does not show which comes first. These series change slowly — this year’s value is close to last year’s. That makes the curve smooth and nearly symmetric, whatever produced the data. Even a sharp peak at one lag (a gap of some years) would not prove that one measure changes the other.
The data
births per woman
% of population
Years
Chad TCD
6.03
2.12%
2024, 2025
Somalia, Fed. Rep. SOM
6.01
2.62%
2024, 2025
Congo, Dem. Rep. COD
5.98
3.08%
2024, 2025
Central African Republic CAF
5.95
2.2%
2024, 2025
Niger NER
5.93
2.62%
2024, 2025
Mali MLI
5.51
2.36%
2024, 2025
Angola AGO
5.05
2.89%
2024, 2025
Burundi BDI
4.79
2.55%
2024, 2025
Afghanistan AFG
4.76
2.43%
2024, 2025
Mozambique MOZ
4.69
2.73%
2024, 2025
Mauritania MRT
4.63
3.25%
2024, 2025
Tanzania TZA
4.54
3.04%
2024, 2025
Benin BEN
4.48
3.15%
2024, 2025
Nigeria NGA
4.38
3.07%
2024, 2025
Sudan SDN
4.26
3.39%
2024, 2025
World Bank, World Development Indicators World Bank, World Development Indicators
Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2024–2025. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 12,497 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated DYB 2024. How the country data works · explore Fertility rate and Population 65+
This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that Fertility rate changes Population 65+, or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.