placestats

People who did not move and Robbery rate

Where People who did not move is higher, Robbery rate tends to be higher. The link is weak: +0.31 across 2,281 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it. It holds inside states too. Measured separately within each of 36 states, the middle value of the link is +0.66.

Holds after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

People who did not move

Tax filers who filed from the same address in both years.

IRS county migration flows · IRS SOI migration, county aggregates

Robbery rate

Robberies in the year, per 100,000 residents, from the FBI. A robbery is taking something from a person by force or by threat, such as a mugging. It counts only crimes reported to police or found by them, so crimes nobody reports are missing. For a state, the figure is the FBI's estimate, which fills in for police agencies that did not report. For a county, it is only what the agencies reported, and it is shown only where agencies that reported for all 12 months serve at least 90% of the people who live there.

FBI Uniform Crime Reporting program (Crime Data Explorer) · FBI Crime Data Explorer: states, estimated_crimes robbery; counties, Return A master file, actual offenses

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By people who did not move

People who did not move, per 1,000 residentsRobbery rate
Highest
Glasscock County, TX1120.560
Garfield County, MT1057.570
Presidio County, TX1029.120
Edwards County, TX959.050
Real County, TX956.040
Lowest
Crowley County, CO347.050
Trinity County, CA432.7738.2
North Slope Borough, AK441.109.35
Lexington city, VA449.060
Greensville County, VA462.148.96

By robbery rate

People who did not move, per 1,000 residentsRobbery rate
Highest
District of Columbia, DC649.52625
Baltimore city, MD578.80584
Alameda County, CA757.17371
San Francisco County, CA698.03361
Philadelphia County, PA618.40339
Lowest
Washington County, CO737.340
San Miguel County, CO754.920
San Juan County, CO775.360
Saguache County, CO498.540
Phillips County, CO821.870
States

By people who did not move

People who did not move, per 1,000 residentsRobbery rate
Highest
Nebraska816.8726.4
Utah815.1125.9
South Dakota813.0220.6
Minnesota812.2048.4
Wisconsin812.0639.6
Lowest
District of Columbia649.52607
Louisiana693.7655.7
Alabama702.3842.8
Mississippi707.6521.2
Georgia714.2944.6

By robbery rate

People who did not move, per 1,000 residentsRobbery rate
Highest
District of Columbia649.52607
Maryland758.47131
California769.95128
Illinois778.22110
New York750.79105
Lowest
Idaho798.829.39
West Virginia727.9511.4
Wyoming801.0011.6
Maine786.0511.7
Vermont792.6514.6
Metro areas

By people who did not move

People who did not move, per 1,000 residentsRobbery rate
Highest
Eagle Pass, TX914.5125.9
El Centro, CA905.9735.7
Jasper, IN902.450
Columbus, NE886.5315.3
Effingham, IL870.022.33
Lowest
Huntsville, TX482.8028.7
Boone, NC554.323.65
Vermillion, SD554.796.42
Pullman, WA556.4912
Statesboro, GA582.6835.6

By robbery rate

People who did not move, per 1,000 residentsRobbery rate
Highest
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA780.89235
Memphis, TN-MS-AR754.00234
Stockton-Lodi, CA775.90194
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD756.53178
Pueblo, CO734.14166
Lowest
Zapata, TX752.840
Yankton, SD781.220
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA763.370
Warren, PA787.630
Urbana, OH805.840

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 2,289 counties: the five with far more robbery rate than their people who did not move would suggest, and the five with far less.

People who did not move, per 1,000 residentsRobbery rate
Above the line
District of Columbia, DC649.52625
Baltimore city, MD578.80584
Alameda County, CA757.17371
San Francisco County, CA698.03361
Philadelphia County, PA618.40339
Below the line
Crowley County, CO347.050
Lexington city, VA449.060
Forest County, PA483.570
Saguache County, CO498.540
Lincoln County, AR500.000

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything+0.4412,281 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education+0.306the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size+0.245size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state+0.247each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight+0.319the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 227 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states+0.662the link worked out inside each of 36 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting+0.370uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 1.5e-50. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 7.8e-7. The site tested 29,403 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 9.4e-50.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.21 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where people who did not move rose most, did robbery ratemove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.

PeriodCountiesChange togetherWithin statesq
2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic————
2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years1,883+0.03+0.050.299

Not measurable over the main period, so only the second period is shown. How change is measured.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore People who did not move and Robbery rate