Motor vehicle crash deaths and Homicide rate, annual
Where Motor vehicle crash deaths is higher, Homicide rate, annual tends to be higher. The link is moderate: +0.50 across 401 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it.
Holds after adjusting
Every place, plotted
One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.
Loading every place…
What each measure is
Motor vehicle crash deaths
Deaths in car and other motor vehicle crashes per 100,000 people.
County Health Rankings · County Health Rankings v039
Homicide rate, annual
Deaths recorded as homicide in the year, per 100,000 residents, from death certificates (CDC WONDER). It is shown only for places and years with 10 or more homicides, so small counties appear rarely or never.
CDC WONDER mortality · CDC WONDER underlying cause of death, homicide by intent, by county and year
Highest and lowest
Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.
Counties
By motor vehicle crash deaths
| Motor vehicle crash deaths | Homicide rate, annual | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Oglala Lakota County, SD | 86.4 | 81.9 |
| Apache County, AZ | 61.5 | 15.4 |
| Colleton County, SC | 47.9 | 33.4 |
| Holmes County, MS | 47.6 | 95.1 |
| Bladen County, NC | 43.1 | 33.9 |
| Lowest | ||
| New York County, NY | 2.71 | 4.13 |
| Kings County, NY | 3.66 | 5.08 |
| Richmond County, NY | 3.83 | 3.67 |
| Queens County, NY | 3.98 | 2.75 |
| Middlesex County, MA | 4.03 | 1.35 |
By homicide rate, annual
| Motor vehicle crash deaths | Homicide rate, annual | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Holmes County, MS | 47.6 | 95.1 |
| Leflore County, MS | 28.8 | 87.2 |
| Oglala Lakota County, SD | 86.4 | 81.9 |
| Coahoma County, MS | 27.9 | 69.7 |
| Washington County, MS | 27.6 | 69.1 |
| Lowest | ||
| Nassau County, NY | 6.11 | 1.01 |
| DuPage County, IL | 4.91 | 1.19 |
| Westchester County, NY | 4.15 | 1.31 |
| Middlesex County, MA | 4.03 | 1.35 |
| Norfolk County, MA | 5.05 | 1.65 |
States
By motor vehicle crash deaths
| Motor vehicle crash deaths | Homicide rate, annual | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Mississippi | 25.5 | 18.5 |
| South Carolina | 20.8 | 10.5 |
| Alabama | 20.7 | 14 |
| Arkansas | 19.8 | 10.6 |
| New Mexico | 19.8 | 13.7 |
| Lowest | ||
| New York | 5.9 | 3.81 |
| Massachusetts | 6.01 | 2.6 |
| District of Columbia | 6.39 | 35.9 |
| Rhode Island | 6.89 | 2.74 |
| New Jersey | 6.98 | 3.15 |
By homicide rate, annual
| Motor vehicle crash deaths | Homicide rate, annual | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| District of Columbia | 6.39 | 35.9 |
| Mississippi | 25.5 | 18.5 |
| Louisiana | 18 | 18.3 |
| Alabama | 20.7 | 14 |
| New Mexico | 19.8 | 13.7 |
| Lowest | ||
| New Hampshire | 9.05 | 2.07 |
| Utah | 8.72 | 2.22 |
| Idaho | 13.8 | 2.49 |
| Massachusetts | 6.01 | 2.6 |
| Rhode Island | 6.89 | 2.74 |
Metro areas
By motor vehicle crash deaths
| Motor vehicle crash deaths | Homicide rate, annual | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Lumberton, NC | 41.4 | 42.6 |
| Show Low, AZ | 40.2 | 11 |
| Selma, AL | 39.2 | 66.4 |
| Orangeburg, SC | 38.5 | 20.5 |
| Henderson, NC | 32.3 | 30.7 |
| Lowest | ||
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 5.04 | 3.86 |
| Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH | 5.14 | 2.33 |
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 5.9 | 2.93 |
| Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI | 6.33 | 6.74 |
| Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY | 6.52 | 5.37 |
By homicide rate, annual
| Motor vehicle crash deaths | Homicide rate, annual | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | ||
| Greenwood, MS | 28.8 | 87.2 |
| Clarksdale, MS | 27.9 | 69.7 |
| Greenville, MS | 27.6 | 69.1 |
| Selma, AL | 39.2 | 66.4 |
| Pine Bluff, AR | 25.7 | 48.7 |
| Lowest | ||
| Worcester, MA | 6.6 | 1.73 |
| Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH | 5.14 | 2.33 |
| San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA | 7.35 | 2.45 |
| San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA | 8.46 | 2.57 |
| Manchester-Nashua, NH | 7.78 | 2.57 |
Counties furthest from the pattern
Compared with the straight line that best fits all 401 counties: the five with far more homicide rate, annual than their motor vehicle crash deaths would suggest, and the five with far less.
| Motor vehicle crash deaths | Homicide rate, annual | |
|---|---|---|
| Above the line | ||
| Leflore County, MS | 28.8 | 87.2 |
| Holmes County, MS | 47.6 | 95.1 |
| Coahoma County, MS | 27.9 | 69.7 |
| Washington County, MS | 27.6 | 69.1 |
| Orleans Parish, LA | 13.2 | 45.6 |
| Below the line | ||
| Apache County, AZ | 61.5 | 15.4 |
| Navajo County, AZ | 40.2 | 11 |
| Ector County, TX | 31.3 | 7.3 |
| Liberty County, TX | 31.5 | 12 |
| Florence County, SC | 27.8 | 8.75 |
Two series, one county
Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.
Loading…
Every version of the link
Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.
| Before adjusting for anything | +0.636 | 401 counties reporting both |
| After adjusting for density, income and education | +0.502 | the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is |
| Also adjusting for population size | +0.476 | size taken out as well as density |
| Also comparing only within each state | +0.455 | each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states |
| Giving bigger counties more weight | +0.425 | the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 129 equally weighted counties |
| Middle value inside single states | +0.593 | the link worked out inside each of 6 states with at least 20 counties reporting |
| Using ranks, after adjusting | +0.389 | uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link |
How much to believe it
Could it be chance?
The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 7.8e-27. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 2.0e-6. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 2.9e-26.
Do nearby places look alike?
Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.37 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.
Did they change together?
The figures above compare counties at one moment. This asks a different question: where motor vehicle crash deaths rose most, did homicide rate, annualmove too? Each county’s change is compared with the average change in its own state. That takes out ups and downs that hit a whole region at once. Each change is the gap between two estimates that both contain some error. That error pulls these links towards zero, so a weak one is weak partly for that reason. The q column shows whether a link could be a fluke, allowing for the many pairs tested: 0.05 or less means it is unlikely to be chance.
| Period | Counties | Change together | Within states | q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014–2019 the main test: each Census survey figure averages five years, and these two do not overlap; before the pandemic | 254 | +0.04 | +0.12 | 0.474 |
| 2019–2023 a repeat check: its two five-year survey figures both include 2019, and it covers the COVID years | 298 | +0.31 | +0.26 | 0.076 |
Measured over the nearest years published: Motor vehicle crash deaths: 2013–2019 for the 2014–2019 row; Motor vehicle crash deaths: 2019–2022 for the 2019–2023 row.
Over the main period, any link between the changes could easily be chance. How change is measured.
Related pairs
- Stroke and Homicide rate, annual — +0.80
- Threat of utility shut-off and Homicide rate, annual — +0.72
- Children in single-parent households and Homicide rate, annual — +0.71
- Share Black, not Hispanic and Homicide rate, annual — +0.69
- Child mortality and Homicide rate, annual — +0.69
- Self-care disability and Homicide rate, annual — +0.68
- Health score and Homicide rate, annual — -0.68
- Independent-living disability and Homicide rate, annual — +0.68
Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Motor vehicle crash deaths and Homicide rate, annual