Across 162 countries, Unemployment and Youth not in work or study rise and fall together at r = +0.41 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). It holds up almost unchanged when only countries with similar income (GDP per person) are compared (r = +0.45, q = 0.0032, allowing for the many pairs tested).
Comparing countries across the middle half of unemployment, 3.19% to 8.35% of labor force, youth not in work or study is worse by 4.23% of 15 to 24 year olds at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 3.93% of 15 to 24 year olds.
Link before adjusting (r)+0.405p = 8.7e-8 · 162 countries
After adjusting for national income+0.452p = 1.7e-9 · likely range [+0.32, +0.57]
p, allowing for regions4.8e-5standard error 0.044 · 7 regions
Check for luck (q)0.003across 12,497 pairs
How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.
Unemployment · % of labor forcelink with income -0.00 · independent
Youth not in work or study · % of 15 to 24 year oldslink with income -0.63 · high
“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.
Every country as a dot
best-fit line line after adjusting
Four ways to measure the link
Method
r
p
Countries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted
+0.405
8.7e-8
162
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted
+0.352
4.3e-6
162
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income
+0.452
1.7e-9
162
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income
+0.507
6.6e-12
162
The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 162 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: -0.047 (a minus sign means it grew).
How solid is it?
Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from +0.428 (without DJI) to +0.519 (without BLR). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: BLR (+0.066).
Within each region
Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.
n
r
East Asia & Pacific
23
+0.48
Europe & Central Asia
46
+0.02
Latin America & Caribbean
26
+0.33
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
17
+0.20
Sub-Saharan Africa
42
+0.53
By income third
If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.
n
r
Poorest third
54
+0.50
Middle third
54
+0.40
Richest third
54
+0.44
By largest religious group
Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.
n
r
Christians
100
+0.40
Muslims
42
+0.47
By last european coloniser
Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.
n
r
France
22
+0.48
Never a European colony
17
+0.38
Spain
18
+0.53
United Kingdom
49
+0.65
Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = +0.432 after dropping 11 countries.
Two series, one country
Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.
Loading…
Over time, within countries
Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 35years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.
The link also shows up within countries over time (r = +0.308). It holds even when looking only at changes from one year to the next (r = +0.238). This is the strongest kind of evidence available here: it holds when each country is compared only with itself, and it is not just a product of shared trends.
Across countries (adjusted)+0.452for comparison
Within countries+0.363each country vs itself
…and vs the same year elsewhere+0.308q = 0.000 · 121 countries
Year-on-year changes+0.238q = 0.000
2,244 country-years (one country in one year), 121 countries, 1991–2025, about 19 years each on average. Share of the variation that happens within countries over time: 22% for Unemployment, 22% for Youth not in work or study. The margins of error allow for each country appearing many times, and for each year’s value being close to the year before.
Year-to-year changes are a cautious test, not a final answer. Looking only at changes from one year to the next removes each country’s own trends. But it also makes measurement mistakes louder, which pulls the results toward zero. A near-zero result here is weak evidence of no link, not proof.
With one measure years behind the other
Same year (lag 0): +0.308. A peak away from zero does not show which comes first. These series change slowly — this year’s value is close to last year’s. That makes the curve smooth and nearly symmetric, whatever produced the data. Even a sharp peak at one lag (a gap of some years) would not prove that one measure changes the other.
The data
% of labor force
% of 15 to 24 year olds
Years
Eswatini SWZ
34.2%
36.5%
2025, 2023
South Africa ZAF
32.4%
34.6%
2025, 2024
Djibouti DJI
26%
44%
2025
Botswana BWA
24.5%
38%
2025, 2024
West Bank and Gaza PSE
24.4%
25.8%
2022, 2025
Gabon GAB
20.2%
20.2%
2025, 2024
Namibia NAM
19.3%
31.9%
2025, 2018
Somalia, Fed. Rep. SOM
18.9%
51%
2025, 2022
Jordan JOR
16.5%
29.4%
2025, 2024
Lesotho LSO
16.3%
38%
2025, 2024
Iraq IRQ
15.5%
36.9%
2025, 2021
Tunisia TUN
15.1%
22.6%
2025, 2023
Haiti HTI
14.9%
21.1%
2025, 2012
Angola AGO
14.1%
24.9%
2025
Montenegro MNE
13.6%
14.2%
2025, 2024
World Bank, World Development Indicators World Bank, World Development Indicators
Share of youth not in education, employment or training, total (% of youth population)
International Labour Organization · CC BY 4.0 · updated quarterly
From labour force surveys, so yearly for about a hundred countries and occasional elsewhere.
How this was computed
Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2010–2025. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 12,497 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated DYB 2024. How the country data works · explore Unemployment and Youth not in work or study
This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that Unemployment changes Youth not in work or study, or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.
More links with Unemployment or Youth not in work or study