Maternal mortality vs. Unintended pregnancies ending in abortion
Holds up after adjusting for income
Across 141 countries, Maternal mortality and Unintended pregnancies ending in abortion rise and fall together at r = -0.27 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). It holds up almost unchanged when only countries with similar income (GDP per person) are compared (r = -0.26, q = 0.019, allowing for the many pairs tested).
Comparing countries across the middle half of unintended pregnancies ending in abortion, 31.3% to 58.5% of unintended pregnancies, maternal mortality is better by 77.7 per 100,000 live births at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 52.1 per 100,000 live births.
Link before adjusting (r)-0.275p = 0.001 · 141 countries
After adjusting for national income-0.264p = 0.002 · likely range [-0.41, -0.10]
p, allowing for regions0.291standard error 0.229 · 7 regions
Check for luck (q)0.019across 14,952 pairs
How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.
Maternal mortality · per 100,000 live birthslink with income -0.85 · proxy
Unintended pregnancies ending in abortion · % of unintended pregnancieslink with income +0.12 · independent
“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.
Every country as a dot
best-fit line line after adjusting
Four ways to measure the link
Method
r
p
Countries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted
-0.275
0.001
141
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted
-0.201
0.017
141
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income
-0.264
0.002
141
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income
-0.204
0.016
141
The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 141 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: +0.010 (a minus sign means it grew).
How solid is it?
Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from -0.332 (without NGA) to -0.248 (without TJK). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: NGA (-0.068).
Within each region
Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.
n
r
East Asia & Pacific
20
+0.14
Europe & Central Asia
43
+0.16
Latin America & Caribbean
26
+0.09
Sub-Saharan Africa
42
+0.17
By income third
If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.
n
r
Poorest third
47
-0.18
Middle third
47
-0.21
Richest third
47
+0.13
By largest religious group
Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.
n
r
Christians
96
-0.21
Muslims
27
-0.33
By last european coloniser
Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.
n
r
France
21
-0.37
Never a European colony
16
-0.44
Spain
17
+0.04
United Kingdom
38
-0.17
Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = -0.405 after dropping 10 countries.
Two series, one country
Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.
Loading…
Over time, within countries
Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 0years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.
Not enough history inside each country to look at this over time. That needs countries measured for several years in a row, and at least one of these measures is measured too rarely.
The data
per 100,000 live births
% of unintended pregnancies
Years
Nigeria NGA
993
48.2%
2023, 2019
Chad TCD
748
29.5%
2023, 2019
Central African Republic CAF
692
30%
2023, 2019
Liberia LBR
628
40.4%
2023, 2019
Somalia, Fed. Rep. SOM
563
29.2%
2023, 2019
Benin BEN
518
36.9%
2023, 2019
Guinea-Bissau GNB
505
58.5%
2023, 2019
Guinea GIN
494
38.1%
2023, 2019
Lesotho LSO
478
23.9%
2023, 2019
Madagascar MDG
445
62.8%
2023, 2019
Congo, Dem. Rep. COD
427
27.9%
2023, 2019
Burundi BDI
392
26.2%
2023, 2019
Mauritania MRT
381
25.4%
2023, 2019
Mali MLI
367
33.5%
2023, 2019
Cote d'Ivoire CIV
359
36.7%
2023, 2019
World Bank, World Development Indicators Bearak, J. M., Popinchalk, A., Beavin, C. et al. (2022), 'Country-specific estimates of unintended pregnancy and abortion incidence: a global comparative analysis of levels in 2015-2019', BMJ Global Health 7(3), e007151. Guttmacher Institute. Supplementary appendix, tables A3-A5.
Maternal mortality ratio, modelled estimate (per 100,000 live births)
WHO and the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group · CC BY 4.0 · updated quarterly
Estimated with a model, like stunting, and for the same reason. Deaths in childbirth are rare in small countries with weak death records, so the agencies estimate rather than count.
Share of unintended pregnancies ending in abortion (model estimate, 2015-2019)
Guttmacher Institute (Bearak et al. 2022, BMJ Global Health) · CC BY-NC 4.0 · updated one edition (2015-2019 estimates, published 2022)
Of the unintended pregnancies in the abortion rate's model, the share that ended in abortion, averaged over 2015-2019 (Guttmacher Institute). The rest ended in a birth or a miscarriage. Like the other two, it is an estimate with a range. No "better" direction is set.
How this was computed
Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2019–2023. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 14,952 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated DYB 2024. How the country data works · explore Maternal mortality and Unintended pregnancies ending in abortion
This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that Maternal mortality changes Unintended pregnancies ending in abortion, or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.
More links with Maternal mortality or Unintended pregnancies ending in abortion