placestats

HDI vs. Life satisfaction

Fades after adjusting for income

Across 158 countries, HDI and Life satisfaction rise and fall together at r = +0.80 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). Comparing only countries with similar income (GDP per person) shrinks it to +0.19, which could easily be chance (q = 0.14, allowing for the many pairs tested, and allowing for countries in the same region being alike). So the first figure mostly shows richer countries differing from poorer ones, not a link between these two things. Caution: direction is not consistent across regions.

Comparing countries across the middle half of hdi, 0.618 to 0.884 points, life satisfaction is better by 1.6 points at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 0.782 points.

Link before adjusting (r)+0.804p = 4.3e-37 · 158 countries
After adjusting for national income+0.185p = 0.020 · likely range [+0.03, +0.33]
p, allowing for regions0.032standard error 0.067 · 7 regions
Check for luck (q)0.141across 12,497 pairs

How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.

HDI · index, 0 to 1link with income +0.96 · proxy
Life satisfaction · score (0-10)link with income +0.81 · proxy

Both of these rise and fall closely with national income, so a strong link between them before adjusting was close to certain. Read the adjusted figure, not the first one.

“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.

Every country as a dot

HDI · index, 0 to 1 →Life satisfaction · score (0-10) →0.4040.9721.457.76Afghanistan: 0.496 index, 0 to 1, 1.45 score (0-10)Angola: 0.616 index, 0 to 1, 3.79 score (0-10)Albania: 0.81 index, 0 to 1, 5.66 score (0-10)United Arab Emirates: 0.94 index, 0 to 1, 6.82 score (0-10)Argentina: 0.865 index, 0 to 1, 6.43 score (0-10)Armenia: 0.811 index, 0 to 1, 5.58 score (0-10)Australia: 0.958 index, 0 to 1, 6.92 score (0-10)Austria: 0.93 index, 0 to 1, 6.84 score (0-10)Azerbaijan: 0.789 index, 0 to 1, 4.99 score (0-10)Burundi: 0.439 index, 0 to 1, 3.77 score (0-10)Belgium: 0.951 index, 0 to 1, 6.93 score (0-10)Benin: 0.515 index, 0 to 1, 4.39 score (0-10)Burkina Faso: 0.459 index, 0 to 1, 4.46 score (0-10)Bangladesh: 0.685 index, 0 to 1, 4.32 score (0-10)Bulgaria: 0.845 index, 0 to 1, 5.7 score (0-10)Bahrain: 0.899 index, 0 to 1, 6.25 score (0-10)Bosnia and Herzegovina: 0.804 index, 0 to 1, 6.38 score (0-10)Belarus: 0.824 index, 0 to 1, 5.82 score (0-10)Belize: 0.721 index, 0 to 1, 6.71 score (0-10)Bolivia: 0.733 index, 0 to 1, 5.83 score (0-10)Brazil: 0.786 index, 0 to 1, 6.63 score (0-10)Bhutan: 0.698 index, 0 to 1, 5.08 score (0-10)Botswana: 0.731 index, 0 to 1, 3.46 score (0-10)Central African Republic: 0.414 index, 0 to 1, 3.48 score (0-10)Canada: 0.939 index, 0 to 1, 6.74 score (0-10)Switzerland: 0.97 index, 0 to 1, 7.02 score (0-10)Chile: 0.878 index, 0 to 1, 6.3 score (0-10)China: 0.797 index, 0 to 1, 6.07 score (0-10)Cote d'Ivoire: 0.582 index, 0 to 1, 5.15 score (0-10)Cameroon: 0.588 index, 0 to 1, 5.08 score (0-10)Congo, Dem. Rep.: 0.522 index, 0 to 1, 3.76 score (0-10)Congo, Rep.: 0.649 index, 0 to 1, 4.46 score (0-10)Colombia: 0.788 index, 0 to 1, 6.04 score (0-10)Comoros: 0.603 index, 0 to 1, 3.92 score (0-10)Costa Rica: 0.833 index, 0 to 1, 7.44 score (0-10)Cyprus: 0.913 index, 0 to 1, 6.13 score (0-10)Czechia: 0.915 index, 0 to 1, 6.82 score (0-10)Germany: 0.959 index, 0 to 1, 6.88 score (0-10)Djibouti: 0.513 index, 0 to 1, 4.37 score (0-10)Denmark: 0.962 index, 0 to 1, 7.54 score (0-10)Dominican Republic: 0.776 index, 0 to 1, 6.09 score (0-10)Algeria: 0.763 index, 0 to 1, 5.71 score (0-10)Ecuador: 0.777 index, 0 to 1, 6.14 score (0-10)Egypt, Arab Rep.: 0.754 index, 0 to 1, 3.86 score (0-10)Spain: 0.918 index, 0 to 1, 6.54 score (0-10)Estonia: 0.905 index, 0 to 1, 6.41 score (0-10)Ethiopia: 0.497 index, 0 to 1, 3.98 score (0-10)Finland: 0.948 index, 0 to 1, 7.76 score (0-10)France: 0.92 index, 0 to 1, 6.59 score (0-10)Gabon: 0.733 index, 0 to 1, 5.17 score (0-10)United Kingdom: 0.946 index, 0 to 1, 6.69 score (0-10)Georgia: 0.844 index, 0 to 1, 5.52 score (0-10)Ghana: 0.628 index, 0 to 1, 4.55 score (0-10)Guinea: 0.5 index, 0 to 1, 4.61 score (0-10)Gambia, The: 0.524 index, 0 to 1, 4.31 score (0-10)Greece: 0.908 index, 0 to 1, 5.7 score (0-10)Guatemala: 0.662 index, 0 to 1, 6.53 score (0-10)Guyana: 0.776 index, 0 to 1, 5.99 score (0-10)Hong Kong SAR, China: 0.955 index, 0 to 1, 5.57 score (0-10)Honduras: 0.645 index, 0 to 1, 6.1 score (0-10)Croatia: 0.889 index, 0 to 1, 6.01 score (0-10)Haiti: 0.554 index, 0 to 1, 3.62 score (0-10)Hungary: 0.87 index, 0 to 1, 5.94 score (0-10)Indonesia: 0.728 index, 0 to 1, 5.62 score (0-10)India: 0.685 index, 0 to 1, 4.54 score (0-10)Ireland: 0.949 index, 0 to 1, 6.93 score (0-10)Iran, Islamic Rep.: 0.799 index, 0 to 1, 5.15 score (0-10)Iraq: 0.695 index, 0 to 1, 5.21 score (0-10)Iceland: 0.972 index, 0 to 1, 7.54 score (0-10)Israel: 0.919 index, 0 to 1, 7.19 score (0-10)Italy: 0.915 index, 0 to 1, 6.57 score (0-10)Jamaica: 0.72 index, 0 to 1, 6.3 score (0-10)Jordan: 0.754 index, 0 to 1, 4.48 score (0-10)Japan: 0.925 index, 0 to 1, 6.13 score (0-10)Kazakhstan: 0.837 index, 0 to 1, 6.63 score (0-10)Kenya: 0.628 index, 0 to 1, 4.67 score (0-10)Kyrgyz Republic: 0.72 index, 0 to 1, 6.05 score (0-10)Cambodia: 0.606 index, 0 to 1, 4.46 score (0-10)Korea, Rep.: 0.937 index, 0 to 1, 6.04 score (0-10)Kuwait: 0.852 index, 0 to 1, 6.54 score (0-10)Lao PDR: 0.617 index, 0 to 1, 5.51 score (0-10)Lebanon: 0.752 index, 0 to 1, 3.72 score (0-10)Liberia: 0.51 index, 0 to 1, 4.28 score (0-10)Libya: 0.721 index, 0 to 1, 5.73 score (0-10)Sri Lanka: 0.776 index, 0 to 1, 4.01 score (0-10)Lesotho: 0.55 index, 0 to 1, 4.38 score (0-10)Lithuania: 0.895 index, 0 to 1, 6.7 score (0-10)Luxembourg: 0.922 index, 0 to 1, 7.06 score (0-10)Latvia: 0.889 index, 0 to 1, 6.37 score (0-10)Morocco: 0.71 index, 0 to 1, 4.65 score (0-10)Moldova: 0.785 index, 0 to 1, 5.85 score (0-10)Madagascar: 0.487 index, 0 to 1, 4.17 score (0-10)Maldives: 0.766 index, 0 to 1, 5.2 score (0-10)Mexico: 0.789 index, 0 to 1, 6.97 score (0-10)North Macedonia: 0.815 index, 0 to 1, 5.72 score (0-10)Mali: 0.419 index, 0 to 1, 4.59 score (0-10)Malta: 0.924 index, 0 to 1, 6.44 score (0-10)Myanmar: 0.609 index, 0 to 1, 4.29 score (0-10)Montenegro: 0.862 index, 0 to 1, 6.14 score (0-10)Mongolia: 0.747 index, 0 to 1, 5.94 score (0-10)Mozambique: 0.493 index, 0 to 1, 5.34 score (0-10)Mauritania: 0.563 index, 0 to 1, 4.47 score (0-10)Mauritius: 0.806 index, 0 to 1, 5.94 score (0-10)Malawi: 0.517 index, 0 to 1, 3.28 score (0-10)Malaysia: 0.819 index, 0 to 1, 6 score (0-10)Namibia: 0.665 index, 0 to 1, 4.78 score (0-10)Niger: 0.419 index, 0 to 1, 4.94 score (0-10)Nigeria: 0.56 index, 0 to 1, 4.79 score (0-10)Nicaragua: 0.706 index, 0 to 1, 6.3 score (0-10)Netherlands: 0.955 index, 0 to 1, 7.22 score (0-10)Norway: 0.97 index, 0 to 1, 7.24 score (0-10)Nepal: 0.622 index, 0 to 1, 5.15 score (0-10)New Zealand: 0.938 index, 0 to 1, 7 score (0-10)Oman: 0.858 index, 0 to 1, 6.2 score (0-10)Pakistan: 0.544 index, 0 to 1, 4.87 score (0-10)Panama: 0.839 index, 0 to 1, 6.55 score (0-10)Peru: 0.794 index, 0 to 1, 5.97 score (0-10)Philippines: 0.72 index, 0 to 1, 6.21 score (0-10)Poland: 0.906 index, 0 to 1, 6.77 score (0-10)Portugal: 0.89 index, 0 to 1, 6.03 score (0-10)Paraguay: 0.756 index, 0 to 1, 6.2 score (0-10)West Bank and Gaza: 0.674 index, 0 to 1, 4.69 score (0-10)Qatar: 0.886 index, 0 to 1, 6.37 score (0-10)Romania: 0.845 index, 0 to 1, 6.63 score (0-10)Russian Federation: 0.832 index, 0 to 1, 5.83 score (0-10)Rwanda: 0.578 index, 0 to 1, 3.27 score (0-10)Saudi Arabia: 0.9 index, 0 to 1, 6.82 score (0-10)Sudan: 0.511 index, 0 to 1, 4.14 score (0-10)Senegal: 0.53 index, 0 to 1, 4.79 score (0-10)Singapore: 0.946 index, 0 to 1, 6.58 score (0-10)Sierra Leone: 0.467 index, 0 to 1, 3.25 score (0-10)El Salvador: 0.678 index, 0 to 1, 6.58 score (0-10)Somalia, Fed. Rep.: 0.404 index, 0 to 1, 4.51 score (0-10)Serbia: 0.833 index, 0 to 1, 6.69 score (0-10)Suriname: 0.722 index, 0 to 1, 6.27 score (0-10)Slovak Republic: 0.88 index, 0 to 1, 6.25 score (0-10)Slovenia: 0.931 index, 0 to 1, 6.87 score (0-10)Sweden: 0.959 index, 0 to 1, 7.25 score (0-10)Eswatini: 0.695 index, 0 to 1, 3.91 score (0-10)Syrian Arab Republic: 0.564 index, 0 to 1, 3.46 score (0-10)Chad: 0.416 index, 0 to 1, 4.38 score (0-10)Togo: 0.571 index, 0 to 1, 4.28 score (0-10)Thailand: 0.798 index, 0 to 1, 6.3 score (0-10)Tajikistan: 0.691 index, 0 to 1, 5.59 score (0-10)Turkmenistan: 0.764 index, 0 to 1, 5.47 score (0-10)Trinidad and Tobago: 0.807 index, 0 to 1, 5.91 score (0-10)Tunisia: 0.746 index, 0 to 1, 4.8 score (0-10)Turkiye: 0.853 index, 0 to 1, 5.3 score (0-10)Tanzania: 0.555 index, 0 to 1, 3.9 score (0-10)Uganda: 0.582 index, 0 to 1, 4.49 score (0-10)Ukraine: 0.779 index, 0 to 1, 4.66 score (0-10)Uruguay: 0.862 index, 0 to 1, 6.63 score (0-10)United States: 0.938 index, 0 to 1, 6.82 score (0-10)Uzbekistan: 0.74 index, 0 to 1, 6.28 score (0-10)Viet Nam: 0.766 index, 0 to 1, 6.43 score (0-10)South Africa: 0.741 index, 0 to 1, 5.01 score (0-10)Zambia: 0.595 index, 0 to 1, 4.11 score (0-10)Zimbabwe: 0.598 index, 0 to 1, 3.35 score (0-10)AFGBWACAFDNKFINGTMISLLBNMOZNERSLE

best-fit line line after adjusting

Four ways to measure the link

MethodrpCountries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted+0.8044.3e-37158
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted+0.8191.7e-39158
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income+0.1850.020158
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income+0.2060.010158

The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 158 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: +0.619 (a minus sign means it grew).

How solid is it?

Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from +0.160 (without GUY) to +0.208 (without LBN). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: GUY (-0.025).

Fragile: this link may not hold up.
  • direction is not consistent across regions

Within each region

Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.

nr
East Asia & Pacific16+0.34
Europe & Central Asia48+0.43
Latin America & Caribbean23+0.25
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan22+0.07
Sub-Saharan Africa41-0.13

By income third

If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.

nr
Poorest third53+0.13
Middle third52-0.02
Richest third53+0.49

By largest religious group

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Christians90+0.29
Muslims47-0.01

By last european coloniser

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
France25-0.25
Never a European colony21+0.28
Spain18-0.29
United Kingdom45+0.23

Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = +0.201 after dropping 1 countries.

Two series, one country

Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.

Loading…

Over time, within countries

Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 13years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.

Within countries over time, there is no link that is clearly more than chance (r = +0.131, comparing each country only with itself over the years, and each year only with the same year elsewhere). Whatever the cross-country picture shows, countries whose hdi moved did not tend to see their life satisfaction move with it.

Across countries (adjusted)+0.185for comparison
Within countries+0.161each country vs itself
…and vs the same year elsewhere+0.131q = 0.199 · 154 countries
Year-on-year changes+0.054q = 0.540
Read with care.
  • Almost all of this indicator's variation is between countries, not within them, so the within-country estimate rests on a small part of the data.

1,763 country-years (one country in one year), 154 countries, 2011–2023, about 11 years each on average. Share of the variation that happens within countries over time: 1% for HDI, 9% for Life satisfaction. The margins of error allow for each country appearing many times, and for each year’s value being close to the year before.

Year-to-year changes are a cautious test, not a final answer. Looking only at changes from one year to the next removes each country’s own trends. But it also makes measurement mistakes louder, which pulls the results toward zero. A near-zero result here is weak evidence of no link, not proof.

With one measure years behind the other

0.20−0.2-70+10years Life satisfaction trails HDI →lag -7: r = -0.030 (n = 710)lag -6: r = -0.003 (n = 872)lag -5: r = 0.029 (n = 1,041)lag -4: r = 0.111 (n = 1,192)lag -3: r = 0.144 (n = 1,340)lag -2: r = 0.116 (n = 1,483)lag -1: r = 0.137 (n = 1,622)lag +0: r = 0.131 (n = 1,763)lag +1: r = 0.125 (n = 1,910)lag +2: r = 0.097 (n = 2,052)lag +3: r = 0.041 (n = 2,052)lag +4: r = 0.005 (n = 2,052)lag +5: r = -0.005 (n = 2,041)lag +6: r = -0.025 (n = 2,037)lag +7: r = -0.029 (n = 2,032)lag +8: r = -0.047 (n = 2,027)lag +9: r = -0.048 (n = 2,025)lag +10: r = -0.039 (n = 2,020)

Same year (lag 0): +0.131. A peak away from zero does not show which comes first. These series change slowly — this year’s value is close to last year’s. That makes the curve smooth and nearly symmetric, whatever produced the data. Even a sharp peak at one lag (a gap of some years) would not prove that one measure changes the other.

The data


index, 0 to 1

score (0-10)
Years
Iceland ISL0.9727.542023, 2025
Norway NOR0.977.242023, 2025
Switzerland CHE0.977.022023, 2025
Denmark DNK0.9627.542023, 2025
Sweden SWE0.9597.252023, 2025
Germany DEU0.9596.882023, 2025
Australia AUS0.9586.922023, 2025
Netherlands NLD0.9557.222023, 2025
Hong Kong SAR, China HKG0.9555.572023, 2025
Belgium BEL0.9516.932023, 2025
Ireland IRL0.9496.932023, 2025
Finland FIN0.9487.762023, 2025
Singapore SGP0.9466.582023, 2025
United Kingdom GBR0.9466.692023, 2025
United Arab Emirates ARE0.946.822023, 2025

United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 2025
Helliwell, J. et al., World Happiness Report; underlying data Gallup World Poll

Sources

HDI

Human Development Index

United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report Office · via Our World in Data · CC BY 3.0 IGO · updated annual

The geometric mean (a kind of average that multiplies the parts together) of three parts: income per person (GNI per capita), life expectancy, and schooling (expected years and average years). All four inputs are on this site, and each is flagged. So a link between the HDI and any of them is shown for what it is: the index matching a part of itself. For the same reason it is kept out of this site's own topic scores. Those already contain its parts, and adding it would count each twice. It is the most-cited development index there is. It is here mostly so its parts can be read separately.

Life satisfaction

Life satisfaction (Cantril ladder score)

Gallup / World Happiness Report · via Our World in Data · CC BY 4.0 · updated annual

The national average answer to the "Cantril ladder" question: "Please imagine a ladder, with steps numbered from 0 at the bottom to 10 at the top...". It is a direct survey measure, not a combined index. The six factors the World Happiness Report uses to explain the ladder are not part of it. Values are usually three-year rolling averages of the Gallup World Poll. So each year's value overlaps with the next, and they are not separate readings.

How this was computed

Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2011–2025. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 12,497 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated DYB 2024. How the country data works · explore HDI and Life satisfaction

This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that HDI changes Life satisfaction, or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.

More links with HDI or Life satisfaction