placestats

Injury deaths and Health score

Where Injury deaths is higher, Health score tends to be lower. The link is moderate: -0.41 across 2,784 counties, on a scale from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). That figure compares places with the same population density, income and education, so those differences can't explain it. It holds inside states too. Measured separately within each of 37 states, the middle value of the link is -0.59.

Holds after adjusting

Every place, plotted

One dot for each place reporting both measures. Hover over or tap a dot to see its name and values. The thin line is the straight line that best fits the dots. The bold line, shown for counties, is the link after adjusting for density, income and education. A dot far from the lines is a place that does not follow the pattern.

Loading every place…

What each measure is

Injury deaths

Deaths from injury per 100,000 people: overdoses, crashes, falls, suicides and homicides together.

County Health Rankings · County Health Rankings v135

Health score

One number for a county's health. It averages illness, health habits, preventive care and death rates, each put on the same scale and turned so higher is better. Twenty-six of its thirty measures are CDC PLACES estimates from a statistical model. So measures are averaged within each publisher first, and PLACES counts once, not twenty-six times.

· derived from 41 measures (BRFSS, CDC, CHR)

Highest and lowest

Where each measure is highest and lowest among the places reporting both (2023), with the other measure beside it. This is shown for every size of place where both are published. Metro-area values are added up from their counties. A measure that cannot be added up across counties, such as a middle value (median), has no metro figure. Counts are shown per 1,000 residents, since raw totals would only list the largest places. Cities and towns and ZIP codes are shown where the Census survey or the CDC publishes them; most other sources stop at the county. They are shown for places of 5,000 residents or more, and only where the survey’s margin of error is small enough for the figure to be usable. The CDC publishes its health estimates for cities in a version adjusted for age, so places with older or younger people can be compared fairly, but not for ZIP codes.

Counties

By injury deaths

By health score

States

By injury deaths

Injury deathsHealth score
Highest
West Virginia146-1.69
New Mexico129-0.398
Tennessee115-0.833
Louisiana114-1.24
District of Columbia1130.0907
Lowest
New York600.675
California62.90.55
Nebraska650.425
Hawaii65.10.896
New Jersey66.10.766

By health score

Injury deathsHealth score
Highest
Hawaii65.10.896
Massachusetts75.10.83
Connecticut82.70.789
New Jersey66.10.766
Minnesota77.40.688
Lowest
West Virginia146-1.69
Louisiana114-1.24
Mississippi106-1.24
Arkansas91.4-0.993
Alabama93.4-0.988
Metro areas

By injury deaths

Injury deathsHealth score
Highest
Española, NM213-0.117
Gallup, NM201-1.17
Beckley, WV191-1.27
Show Low, AZ188-0.794
Charleston, WV186-0.779
Lowest
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX32.7-0.324
Brownsville-Harlingen, TX36.9-0.297
Rio Grande City-Roma, TX40.3-1.36
Eagle Pass, TX42.5-1.04
Storm Lake, IA43.70.158

By health score

Injury deathsHealth score
Highest
Los Alamos, NM71.51.76
Breckenridge, CO65.51.5
Boulder, CO70.71.47
Heber, UT56.91.46
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA47.41.44
Lowest
Zapata, TX58.3-1.95
Lumberton, NC179-1.77
Minden, LA97.4-1.73
Cleveland, MS115-1.68
Durant, OK105-1.67

Counties furthest from the pattern

Compared with the straight line that best fits all 2,792 counties: the five with far more health score than their injury deaths would suggest, and the five with far less.

Injury deathsHealth score
Above the line
Alpine County, CA3120.163
Pitkin County, CO77.42.09
Ouray County, CO1121.33
Aleutians West Census Area, AK80.81.58
Summit County, CO54.51.81
Below the line
East Carroll Parish, LA86.5-2.21
Humphreys County, MS113-2.02
Jim Hogg County, TX59.5-1.31
Lake County, TN106-1.79
Telfair County, GA66.4-1.26

Two series, one county

Both measures over time for a county you pick. The two charts are stacked, so they share only the years along the bottom. You can pick from the thirty largest counties reporting both. This panel covers 2010–2024, and a measure published only once shows as a single dot.

Loading…

Every version of the link

Each row measures the same link, from −1 to +1, in a different way. If the rows mostly agree, the link does not depend on one choice of method.

Before adjusting for anything-0.5832,784 counties reporting both
After adjusting for density, income and education-0.414the part of the link that is not just how urban, rich and educated a place is
Also adjusting for population size-0.415size taken out as well as density
Also comparing only within each state-0.407each county is compared only with others in its own state, so this is no longer a comparison between states
Giving bigger counties more weight-0.400the adjusted link for the average resident rather than the average county. With this weighting, the data counts for about 259 equally weighted counties
Middle value inside single states-0.589the link worked out inside each of 37 states with at least 20 counties reporting
Using ranks, after adjusting-0.322uses each county’s rank, not its value, so a few extreme counties cannot create the link

How much to believe it

Could it be chance?

The p-value is the chance of seeing a link this strong if there were really none. A value of 0.05 or less means the link is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 3.1e-16 means 0.00000000000000031, and the bigger the number after “e-”, the smaller the value. Treating every county as a separate case gives p = 9.1e-116. But counties in the same state tend to resemble each other, so the better figure allows for that: p = 2.4e-6. The site tested 20,910 pairs, and testing so many turns up some flukes. The q-value allows for that too. For this pair it is 8.0e-115.

Do nearby places look alike?

Moran’s I measures how much nearby places look alike: 0 means no map pattern, and higher means neighbours are more similar. For the part of each county that the adjustment leaves unexplained, it is +0.44 (p = 0.001). That unexplained part still clusters on the map. So some regional factor shared by both measures is not accounted for.

Did they change together?

Not measurable: at least one of these is published for too few of the years a change needs (2014–2019 or 2019–2023), or for too few counties in both.

Related pairs

Association only. Nothing here shows that either measure changes the other. This describes counties, not the people in them. Two measures going together across places does not mean the same people have both. How the US county data works · Explore Injury deaths and Health score