placestats

Independent opposition vs. Property rights

Fades after adjusting for income

Across 167 countries, Independent opposition and Property rights rise and fall together at r = +0.63 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). Comparing only countries with similar income (GDP per person) leaves r = +0.58, which could easily be chance (q = 0.061, allowing for the many pairs tested, and allowing for countries in the same region being alike). Caution: correlation moves sharply once outliers are trimmed.

Comparing countries across the middle half of property rights, 0.643 to 0.865 points, independent opposition is better by 1.05 points at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 1.09 points.

Link before adjusting (r)+0.633p = 4.0e-20 · 167 countries
After adjusting for national income+0.579p = 3.0e-16 · likely range [+0.47, +0.67]
p, allowing for regions0.000standard error 0.080 · 7 regions
Check for luck (q)0.061across 17,292 pairs

How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.

Independent opposition · score (higher = more independent)link with income +0.45 · moderate
Property rights · index (0-1)link with income +0.57 · moderate

“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.

Every country as a dot

Independent opposition · score (higher = more independent) →Property rights · index (0-1) →-3.373.130.1450.968Afghanistan: -2.89 score (higher = more independent), 0.252 index (0-1)Angola: 0.728 score (higher = more independent), 0.415 index (0-1)Albania: 1.24 score (higher = more independent), 0.799 index (0-1)United Arab Emirates: -2.46 score (higher = more independent), 0.319 index (0-1)Argentina: 1.74 score (higher = more independent), 0.872 index (0-1)Armenia: 1.46 score (higher = more independent), 0.753 index (0-1)Australia: 2.62 score (higher = more independent), 0.892 index (0-1)Austria: 2.73 score (higher = more independent), 0.858 index (0-1)Azerbaijan: -0.517 score (higher = more independent), 0.639 index (0-1)Burundi: -0.573 score (higher = more independent), 0.621 index (0-1)Belgium: 2.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.954 index (0-1)Benin: 0.386 score (higher = more independent), 0.901 index (0-1)Burkina Faso: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.645 index (0-1)Bangladesh: 0.499 score (higher = more independent), 0.896 index (0-1)Bulgaria: 1.59 score (higher = more independent), 0.905 index (0-1)Bahrain: -1.25 score (higher = more independent), 0.792 index (0-1)Bosnia and Herzegovina: 0.781 score (higher = more independent), 0.816 index (0-1)Belarus: -1.6 score (higher = more independent), 0.71 index (0-1)Bolivia: 1.96 score (higher = more independent), 0.674 index (0-1)Brazil: 2.58 score (higher = more independent), 0.808 index (0-1)Barbados: 2.44 score (higher = more independent), 0.844 index (0-1)Bhutan: 1.31 score (higher = more independent), 0.682 index (0-1)Botswana: 1.66 score (higher = more independent), 0.826 index (0-1)Central African Republic: 0.683 score (higher = more independent), 0.322 index (0-1)Canada: 2.51 score (higher = more independent), 0.784 index (0-1)Switzerland: 2.72 score (higher = more independent), 0.931 index (0-1)Chile: 3.13 score (higher = more independent), 0.929 index (0-1)China: -2.28 score (higher = more independent), 0.427 index (0-1)Cote d'Ivoire: 1.24 score (higher = more independent), 0.689 index (0-1)Cameroon: -0.371 score (higher = more independent), 0.803 index (0-1)Congo, Dem. Rep.: 0.573 score (higher = more independent), 0.256 index (0-1)Congo, Rep.: 0.508 score (higher = more independent), 0.533 index (0-1)Colombia: 2.26 score (higher = more independent), 0.772 index (0-1)Comoros: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.476 index (0-1)Cabo Verde: 2.53 score (higher = more independent), 0.846 index (0-1)Costa Rica: 1.98 score (higher = more independent), 0.925 index (0-1)Cyprus: 2.54 score (higher = more independent), 0.789 index (0-1)Czechia: 2.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.929 index (0-1)Germany: 2.66 score (higher = more independent), 0.968 index (0-1)Djibouti: 0.062 score (higher = more independent), 0.562 index (0-1)Denmark: 2.83 score (higher = more independent), 0.941 index (0-1)Dominican Republic: 1.51 score (higher = more independent), 0.816 index (0-1)Algeria: -0.094 score (higher = more independent), 0.739 index (0-1)Ecuador: 1.73 score (higher = more independent), 0.644 index (0-1)Egypt, Arab Rep.: -0.965 score (higher = more independent), 0.642 index (0-1)Spain: 2.74 score (higher = more independent), 0.954 index (0-1)Estonia: 2.71 score (higher = more independent), 0.927 index (0-1)Ethiopia: -0.535 score (higher = more independent), 0.493 index (0-1)Finland: 2.65 score (higher = more independent), 0.824 index (0-1)Fiji: 1.7 score (higher = more independent), 0.532 index (0-1)France: 2.59 score (higher = more independent), 0.946 index (0-1)Gabon: 0.682 score (higher = more independent), 0.798 index (0-1)United Kingdom: 2.26 score (higher = more independent), 0.858 index (0-1)Georgia: 1.28 score (higher = more independent), 0.886 index (0-1)Ghana: 2.04 score (higher = more independent), 0.847 index (0-1)Guinea: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.319 index (0-1)Gambia, The: 0.787 score (higher = more independent), 0.814 index (0-1)Guinea-Bissau: 0.862 score (higher = more independent), 0.514 index (0-1)Equatorial Guinea: -0.253 score (higher = more independent), 0.413 index (0-1)Greece: 2.08 score (higher = more independent), 0.899 index (0-1)Guatemala: 2.17 score (higher = more independent), 0.627 index (0-1)Guyana: 0.768 score (higher = more independent), 0.836 index (0-1)Hong Kong SAR, China: -0.864 score (higher = more independent), 0.871 index (0-1)Honduras: 2.1 score (higher = more independent), 0.851 index (0-1)Croatia: 1.5 score (higher = more independent), 0.955 index (0-1)Haiti: 0.187 score (higher = more independent), 0.635 index (0-1)Hungary: 0.224 score (higher = more independent), 0.922 index (0-1)Indonesia: 0.469 score (higher = more independent), 0.672 index (0-1)India: 1.58 score (higher = more independent), 0.77 index (0-1)Ireland: 3.01 score (higher = more independent), 0.919 index (0-1)Iran, Islamic Rep.: -1.75 score (higher = more independent), 0.685 index (0-1)Iraq: 0.313 score (higher = more independent), 0.648 index (0-1)Iceland: 2.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.959 index (0-1)Israel: 2.35 score (higher = more independent), 0.885 index (0-1)Italy: 2.73 score (higher = more independent), 0.927 index (0-1)Jamaica: 2 score (higher = more independent), 0.898 index (0-1)Jordan: 0.662 score (higher = more independent), 0.808 index (0-1)Japan: 1.92 score (higher = more independent), 0.924 index (0-1)Kazakhstan: -0.551 score (higher = more independent), 0.763 index (0-1)Kenya: 1.39 score (higher = more independent), 0.706 index (0-1)Kyrgyz Republic: -0.721 score (higher = more independent), 0.85 index (0-1)Cambodia: -0.704 score (higher = more independent), 0.498 index (0-1)Korea, Rep.: 2.76 score (higher = more independent), 0.829 index (0-1)Kuwait: -0.978 score (higher = more independent), 0.609 index (0-1)Lao PDR: -2.8 score (higher = more independent), 0.344 index (0-1)Lebanon: 0.53 score (higher = more independent), 0.671 index (0-1)Liberia: 1.66 score (higher = more independent), 0.745 index (0-1)Libya: 0.783 score (higher = more independent), 0.558 index (0-1)Sri Lanka: 1.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.807 index (0-1)Lesotho: 1.97 score (higher = more independent), 0.712 index (0-1)Lithuania: 2.13 score (higher = more independent), 0.934 index (0-1)Luxembourg: 2.33 score (higher = more independent), 0.929 index (0-1)Latvia: 2.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.91 index (0-1)Morocco: 0.63 score (higher = more independent), 0.803 index (0-1)Moldova: 2.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.92 index (0-1)Madagascar: 1.98 score (higher = more independent), 0.832 index (0-1)Maldives: 1.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.82 index (0-1)Mexico: 0.679 score (higher = more independent), 0.846 index (0-1)North Macedonia: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.799 index (0-1)Mali: 1.33 score (higher = more independent), 0.775 index (0-1)Malta: 2.64 score (higher = more independent), 0.919 index (0-1)Myanmar: -1.3 score (higher = more independent), 0.288 index (0-1)Montenegro: 1.74 score (higher = more independent), 0.91 index (0-1)Mongolia: 1.3 score (higher = more independent), 0.803 index (0-1)Mozambique: 0.615 score (higher = more independent), 0.476 index (0-1)Mauritania: -0.206 score (higher = more independent), 0.638 index (0-1)Mauritius: 1.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.83 index (0-1)Malawi: 1.27 score (higher = more independent), 0.787 index (0-1)Malaysia: 1.76 score (higher = more independent), 0.709 index (0-1)Namibia: 2.53 score (higher = more independent), 0.846 index (0-1)Niger: 2.33 score (higher = more independent), 0.687 index (0-1)Nigeria: 1.5 score (higher = more independent), 0.742 index (0-1)Nicaragua: -1.89 score (higher = more independent), 0.495 index (0-1)Netherlands: 2.86 score (higher = more independent), 0.851 index (0-1)Norway: 2.19 score (higher = more independent), 0.934 index (0-1)Nepal: 2.55 score (higher = more independent), 0.723 index (0-1)New Zealand: 2.77 score (higher = more independent), 0.935 index (0-1)Pakistan: 0.106 score (higher = more independent), 0.763 index (0-1)Panama: 1.83 score (higher = more independent), 0.812 index (0-1)Peru: 1.6 score (higher = more independent), 0.8 index (0-1)Philippines: 0.797 score (higher = more independent), 0.792 index (0-1)Papua New Guinea: 2.01 score (higher = more independent), 0.581 index (0-1)Poland: 1.93 score (higher = more independent), 0.93 index (0-1)Portugal: 1.72 score (higher = more independent), 0.659 index (0-1)Paraguay: 1.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.748 index (0-1)West Bank and Gaza: 0.231 score (higher = more independent), 0.646 index (0-1)Romania: 1.96 score (higher = more independent), 0.9 index (0-1)Russian Federation: -1.45 score (higher = more independent), 0.762 index (0-1)Rwanda: -1.38 score (higher = more independent), 0.172 index (0-1)Saudi Arabia: -2.61 score (higher = more independent), 0.517 index (0-1)Sudan: 0.09 score (higher = more independent), 0.145 index (0-1)Senegal: 0.71 score (higher = more independent), 0.813 index (0-1)Singapore: 1.89 score (higher = more independent), 0.715 index (0-1)Solomon Islands: 1.91 score (higher = more independent), 0.772 index (0-1)Sierra Leone: 1.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.673 index (0-1)El Salvador: 1.29 score (higher = more independent), 0.717 index (0-1)Somalia, Fed. Rep.: 0.418 score (higher = more independent), 0.252 index (0-1)Serbia: 0.38 score (higher = more independent), 0.896 index (0-1)Sao Tome and Principe: 0.609 score (higher = more independent), 0.804 index (0-1)Suriname: 1.9 score (higher = more independent), 0.859 index (0-1)Slovak Republic: 2.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.929 index (0-1)Slovenia: 1.97 score (higher = more independent), 0.888 index (0-1)Sweden: 2.77 score (higher = more independent), 0.933 index (0-1)Eswatini: -1.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.156 index (0-1)Seychelles: 1.75 score (higher = more independent), 0.74 index (0-1)Syrian Arab Republic: -0.732 score (higher = more independent), 0.468 index (0-1)Chad: 0.65 score (higher = more independent), 0.779 index (0-1)Togo: 0.357 score (higher = more independent), 0.698 index (0-1)Thailand: 1.45 score (higher = more independent), 0.717 index (0-1)Tajikistan: -1.2 score (higher = more independent), 0.559 index (0-1)Turkmenistan: -2.17 score (higher = more independent), 0.163 index (0-1)Timor-Leste: 1.41 score (higher = more independent), 0.65 index (0-1)Trinidad and Tobago: 1.94 score (higher = more independent), 0.882 index (0-1)Tunisia: 1.11 score (higher = more independent), 0.87 index (0-1)Turkiye: 0.86 score (higher = more independent), 0.629 index (0-1)Tanzania: 1.1 score (higher = more independent), 0.657 index (0-1)Uganda: 0.496 score (higher = more independent), 0.451 index (0-1)Ukraine: 0.717 score (higher = more independent), 0.79 index (0-1)Uruguay: 2.96 score (higher = more independent), 0.695 index (0-1)United States: 2.31 score (higher = more independent), 0.844 index (0-1)Uzbekistan: -1.46 score (higher = more independent), 0.623 index (0-1)Viet Nam: -3.37 score (higher = more independent), 0.71 index (0-1)Vanuatu: 1.49 score (higher = more independent), 0.725 index (0-1)Kosovo: 1.99 score (higher = more independent), 0.518 index (0-1)South Africa: 0.912 score (higher = more independent), 0.858 index (0-1)Zambia: 0.22 score (higher = more independent), 0.633 index (0-1)Zimbabwe: -0.068 score (higher = more independent), 0.544 index (0-1)AFGBELBHRCHLCODDEUGINHKGSDNSWZTKMVNM

best-fit line line after adjusting

Four ways to measure the link

MethodrpCountries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted+0.6334.0e-20167
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted+0.6575.7e-22167
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income+0.5793.0e-16167
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income+0.5396.9e-14167

The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 167 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: +0.054 (a minus sign means it grew).

How solid is it?

Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from +0.551 (without ARE) to +0.596 (without VNM). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: ARE (-0.028).

Fragile: this link may not hold up.
  • correlation moves sharply once outliers are trimmed

Within each region

Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.

nr
East Asia & Pacific21+0.60
Europe & Central Asia49+0.51
Latin America & Caribbean23+0.45
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan20+0.79
Sub-Saharan Africa46+0.58

By income third

If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.

nr
Poorest third56+0.56
Middle third55+0.60
Richest third56+0.68

By largest religious group

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Christians99+0.51
Muslims47+0.50

By last European coloniser

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
France25+0.40
Never a European colony20+0.74
Spain19+0.46
United Kingdom48+0.66

By official ideology

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Nationalist24+0.67
No strong official ideology117+0.34

By party system

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
A few parties banned26+0.32
No parties banned122+0.16

Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = +0.402 after dropping 13 countries.

Two series, one country

Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.

Loading…

Over time, within countries

Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 36years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.

The link also shows up within countries over time (r = +0.306). It holds even when looking only at changes from one year to the next (r = +0.152). This is the strongest kind of evidence available here: it holds when each country is compared only with itself, and it is not just a product of shared trends.

Across countries (adjusted)+0.579for comparison
Within countries+0.372each country vs itself
…and vs the same year elsewhere+0.306q = 0.000 · 173 countries
Year-on-year changes+0.152q = 0.000

6,120 country-years (one country in one year), 173 countries, 1990–2025, about 35 years each on average. Share of the variation that happens within countries over time: 12% for Independent opposition, 13% for Property rights. The margins of error allow for each country appearing many times, and for each year’s value being close to the year before.

Year-to-year changes are a cautious test, not a final answer. Looking only at changes from one year to the next removes each country’s own trends. But it also makes measurement mistakes louder, which pulls the results toward zero. A near-zero result here is weak evidence of no link, not proof.

With one measure years behind the other

0.40−0.4-100+10years Property rights trails Independent opposition →lag -10: r = 0.015 (n = 4,410)lag -9: r = 0.035 (n = 4,580)lag -8: r = 0.052 (n = 4,750)lag -7: r = 0.078 (n = 4,920)lag -6: r = 0.101 (n = 5,090)lag -5: r = 0.129 (n = 5,265)lag -4: r = 0.157 (n = 5,436)lag -3: r = 0.187 (n = 5,607)lag -2: r = 0.223 (n = 5,778)lag -1: r = 0.269 (n = 5,949)lag +0: r = 0.306 (n = 6,120)lag +1: r = 0.292 (n = 5,951)lag +2: r = 0.262 (n = 5,783)lag +3: r = 0.224 (n = 5,613)lag +4: r = 0.184 (n = 5,443)lag +5: r = 0.151 (n = 5,272)lag +6: r = 0.140 (n = 5,100)lag +7: r = 0.128 (n = 4,928)lag +8: r = 0.114 (n = 4,756)lag +9: r = 0.099 (n = 4,584)lag +10: r = 0.083 (n = 4,412)

Same year (lag 0): +0.306. A peak away from zero does not show which comes first. These series change slowly — this year’s value is close to last year’s. That makes the curve smooth and nearly symmetric, whatever produced the data. Even a sharp peak at one lag (a gap of some years) would not prove that one measure changes the other.

The data


score (higher = more independent)

index (0-1)
Years
Chile CHL3.130.9292025
Ireland IRL3.010.9192025
Uruguay URY2.960.6952025
Netherlands NLD2.860.8512025
Belgium BEL2.850.9542025
Latvia LVA2.840.912025
Slovak Republic SVK2.840.9292025
Denmark DNK2.830.9412025
New Zealand NZL2.770.9352025
Sweden SWE2.770.9332025
Korea, Rep. KOR2.760.8292025
Spain ESP2.740.9542025
Italy ITA2.730.9272025
Austria AUT2.730.8582025
Switzerland CHE2.720.9312025

Coppedge, M. et al., V-Dem Dataset v16, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project; Lindberg, S. I. et al., Varieties of Party Identity and Organization (V-Party) Dataset. Read from the V-Dem Institute's vdemdata package.
Coppedge, M. et al., V-Dem Dataset v16, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project; Lindberg, S. I. et al., Varieties of Party Identity and Organization (V-Party) Dataset. Read from the V-Dem Institute's vdemdata package.

Sources

Independent opposition

Opposition parties' independence from the ruling regime

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · updated annual (V-Dem); V-Party per election, to 2019

Are opposition parties really independent, or picked or bought by the people in power? Experts answer from 0 ("opposition parties are not allowed") to 4 ("all opposition parties are independent"). V-Dem turns the answers into a score of about -4 to +4. A part of V-Dem's freedom of association index.

Property rights

Property rights index

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · updated annual (V-Dem); V-Party per election, to 2019

How far people have the right to own, buy, inherit and sell private property, including land, from 0 (virtually no one) to 1 (virtually everyone). It combines V-Dem's expert ratings for men and for women. Limits can come from the law, from the state failing to enforce it, or from custom and religion. It is about the right to property, not how much property people actually own.

How this was computed

Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2019–2025. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 17,292 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated V-Dem v16; V-Party v2. How the country data works · explore Independent opposition and Property rights

This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that Independent opposition changes Property rights, or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.

More links with Independent opposition or Property rights