placestats

Independent opposition vs. Political corruption

Holds up after adjusting for income

Across 166 countries, Independent opposition and Political corruption rise and fall together at r = -0.56 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). It holds up almost unchanged when only countries with similar income (GDP per person) are compared (r = -0.49, q = 0.045, allowing for the many pairs tested).

Comparing countries across the middle half of political corruption, 0.187 to 0.756 points, independent opposition is worse by 1.52 points at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 1.69 points.

Link before adjusting (r)-0.560p = 4.6e-15 · 166 countries
After adjusting for national income-0.493p = 1.8e-11 · likely range [-0.60, -0.37]
p, allowing for regions0.011standard error 0.136 · 7 regions
Check for luck (q)0.045across 17,292 pairs

How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.

Independent opposition · score (higher = more independent)link with income +0.45 · moderate
Political corruption · index (0-1)link with income -0.68 · high

“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.

Every country as a dot

Independent opposition · score (higher = more independent) →Political corruption · index (0-1) →-3.373.130.0040.952Afghanistan: -2.89 score (higher = more independent), 0.769 index (0-1)Angola: 0.728 score (higher = more independent), 0.57 index (0-1)Albania: 1.24 score (higher = more independent), 0.624 index (0-1)United Arab Emirates: -2.46 score (higher = more independent), 0.105 index (0-1)Argentina: 1.74 score (higher = more independent), 0.415 index (0-1)Armenia: 1.46 score (higher = more independent), 0.472 index (0-1)Australia: 2.62 score (higher = more independent), 0.029 index (0-1)Austria: 2.73 score (higher = more independent), 0.095 index (0-1)Azerbaijan: -0.517 score (higher = more independent), 0.89 index (0-1)Burundi: -0.573 score (higher = more independent), 0.845 index (0-1)Belgium: 2.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.031 index (0-1)Benin: 0.386 score (higher = more independent), 0.191 index (0-1)Burkina Faso: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.373 index (0-1)Bangladesh: 0.499 score (higher = more independent), 0.78 index (0-1)Bulgaria: 1.59 score (higher = more independent), 0.643 index (0-1)Bahrain: -1.25 score (higher = more independent), 0.477 index (0-1)Bosnia and Herzegovina: 0.781 score (higher = more independent), 0.726 index (0-1)Belarus: -1.6 score (higher = more independent), 0.41 index (0-1)Bolivia: 1.96 score (higher = more independent), 0.763 index (0-1)Brazil: 2.58 score (higher = more independent), 0.423 index (0-1)Barbados: 2.44 score (higher = more independent), 0.073 index (0-1)Bhutan: 1.31 score (higher = more independent), 0.148 index (0-1)Botswana: 1.66 score (higher = more independent), 0.204 index (0-1)Central African Republic: 0.683 score (higher = more independent), 0.854 index (0-1)Canada: 2.51 score (higher = more independent), 0.026 index (0-1)Switzerland: 2.72 score (higher = more independent), 0.02 index (0-1)Chile: 3.13 score (higher = more independent), 0.075 index (0-1)China: -2.28 score (higher = more independent), 0.554 index (0-1)Cote d'Ivoire: 1.24 score (higher = more independent), 0.598 index (0-1)Cameroon: -0.371 score (higher = more independent), 0.939 index (0-1)Congo, Dem. Rep.: 0.573 score (higher = more independent), 0.886 index (0-1)Congo, Rep.: 0.508 score (higher = more independent), 0.841 index (0-1)Colombia: 2.26 score (higher = more independent), 0.388 index (0-1)Comoros: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.774 index (0-1)Cabo Verde: 2.53 score (higher = more independent), 0.288 index (0-1)Costa Rica: 1.98 score (higher = more independent), 0.206 index (0-1)Cyprus: 2.54 score (higher = more independent), 0.166 index (0-1)Czechia: 2.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.171 index (0-1)Germany: 2.66 score (higher = more independent), 0.024 index (0-1)Djibouti: 0.062 score (higher = more independent), 0.706 index (0-1)Denmark: 2.83 score (higher = more independent), 0.004 index (0-1)Dominican Republic: 1.51 score (higher = more independent), 0.588 index (0-1)Algeria: -0.094 score (higher = more independent), 0.662 index (0-1)Ecuador: 1.73 score (higher = more independent), 0.652 index (0-1)Egypt, Arab Rep.: -0.965 score (higher = more independent), 0.729 index (0-1)Spain: 2.74 score (higher = more independent), 0.113 index (0-1)Estonia: 2.71 score (higher = more independent), 0.025 index (0-1)Ethiopia: -0.535 score (higher = more independent), 0.529 index (0-1)Finland: 2.65 score (higher = more independent), 0.031 index (0-1)Fiji: 1.7 score (higher = more independent), 0.289 index (0-1)France: 2.59 score (higher = more independent), 0.056 index (0-1)Gabon: 0.682 score (higher = more independent), 0.72 index (0-1)United Kingdom: 2.26 score (higher = more independent), 0.042 index (0-1)Georgia: 1.28 score (higher = more independent), 0.289 index (0-1)Ghana: 2.04 score (higher = more independent), 0.615 index (0-1)Guinea: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.808 index (0-1)Gambia, The: 0.787 score (higher = more independent), 0.271 index (0-1)Guinea-Bissau: 0.862 score (higher = more independent), 0.828 index (0-1)Equatorial Guinea: -0.253 score (higher = more independent), 0.858 index (0-1)Greece: 2.08 score (higher = more independent), 0.276 index (0-1)Guatemala: 2.17 score (higher = more independent), 0.616 index (0-1)Guyana: 0.768 score (higher = more independent), 0.507 index (0-1)Hong Kong SAR, China: -0.864 score (higher = more independent), 0.085 index (0-1)Honduras: 2.1 score (higher = more independent), 0.752 index (0-1)Croatia: 1.5 score (higher = more independent), 0.254 index (0-1)Haiti: 0.187 score (higher = more independent), 0.786 index (0-1)Hungary: 0.224 score (higher = more independent), 0.488 index (0-1)Indonesia: 0.469 score (higher = more independent), 0.795 index (0-1)India: 1.58 score (higher = more independent), 0.684 index (0-1)Ireland: 3.01 score (higher = more independent), 0.032 index (0-1)Iran, Islamic Rep.: -1.75 score (higher = more independent), 0.768 index (0-1)Iraq: 0.313 score (higher = more independent), 0.892 index (0-1)Iceland: 2.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.014 index (0-1)Israel: 2.35 score (higher = more independent), 0.107 index (0-1)Italy: 2.73 score (higher = more independent), 0.157 index (0-1)Jamaica: 2 score (higher = more independent), 0.207 index (0-1)Jordan: 0.662 score (higher = more independent), 0.422 index (0-1)Japan: 1.92 score (higher = more independent), 0.05 index (0-1)Kazakhstan: -0.551 score (higher = more independent), 0.736 index (0-1)Kenya: 1.39 score (higher = more independent), 0.564 index (0-1)Kyrgyz Republic: -0.721 score (higher = more independent), 0.793 index (0-1)Cambodia: -0.704 score (higher = more independent), 0.904 index (0-1)Korea, Rep.: 2.76 score (higher = more independent), 0.156 index (0-1)Kuwait: -0.978 score (higher = more independent), 0.346 index (0-1)Lao PDR: -2.8 score (higher = more independent), 0.765 index (0-1)Lebanon: 0.53 score (higher = more independent), 0.83 index (0-1)Liberia: 1.66 score (higher = more independent), 0.877 index (0-1)Libya: 0.783 score (higher = more independent), 0.811 index (0-1)Sri Lanka: 1.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.278 index (0-1)Lesotho: 1.97 score (higher = more independent), 0.472 index (0-1)Lithuania: 2.13 score (higher = more independent), 0.159 index (0-1)Luxembourg: 2.33 score (higher = more independent), 0.025 index (0-1)Latvia: 2.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.07 index (0-1)Morocco: 0.63 score (higher = more independent), 0.671 index (0-1)Moldova: 2.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.325 index (0-1)Madagascar: 1.98 score (higher = more independent), 0.882 index (0-1)Maldives: 1.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.312 index (0-1)Mexico: 0.679 score (higher = more independent), 0.574 index (0-1)North Macedonia: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.753 index (0-1)Mali: 1.33 score (higher = more independent), 0.72 index (0-1)Malta: 2.64 score (higher = more independent), 0.186 index (0-1)Myanmar: -1.3 score (higher = more independent), 0.859 index (0-1)Montenegro: 1.74 score (higher = more independent), 0.43 index (0-1)Mongolia: 1.3 score (higher = more independent), 0.693 index (0-1)Mozambique: 0.615 score (higher = more independent), 0.695 index (0-1)Mauritania: -0.206 score (higher = more independent), 0.825 index (0-1)Mauritius: 1.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.356 index (0-1)Malawi: 1.27 score (higher = more independent), 0.628 index (0-1)Malaysia: 1.76 score (higher = more independent), 0.322 index (0-1)Namibia: 2.53 score (higher = more independent), 0.274 index (0-1)Niger: 2.33 score (higher = more independent), 0.591 index (0-1)Nigeria: 1.5 score (higher = more independent), 0.834 index (0-1)Nicaragua: -1.89 score (higher = more independent), 0.942 index (0-1)Netherlands: 2.86 score (higher = more independent), 0.027 index (0-1)Norway: 2.19 score (higher = more independent), 0.01 index (0-1)Nepal: 2.55 score (higher = more independent), 0.561 index (0-1)New Zealand: 2.77 score (higher = more independent), 0.014 index (0-1)Pakistan: 0.106 score (higher = more independent), 0.802 index (0-1)Panama: 1.83 score (higher = more independent), 0.485 index (0-1)Peru: 1.6 score (higher = more independent), 0.63 index (0-1)Philippines: 0.797 score (higher = more independent), 0.841 index (0-1)Papua New Guinea: 2.01 score (higher = more independent), 0.684 index (0-1)Poland: 1.93 score (higher = more independent), 0.081 index (0-1)Portugal: 1.72 score (higher = more independent), 0.166 index (0-1)Paraguay: 1.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.801 index (0-1)Romania: 1.96 score (higher = more independent), 0.419 index (0-1)Russian Federation: -1.45 score (higher = more independent), 0.783 index (0-1)Rwanda: -1.38 score (higher = more independent), 0.418 index (0-1)Saudi Arabia: -2.61 score (higher = more independent), 0.326 index (0-1)Sudan: 0.09 score (higher = more independent), 0.719 index (0-1)Senegal: 0.71 score (higher = more independent), 0.404 index (0-1)Singapore: 1.89 score (higher = more independent), 0.013 index (0-1)Solomon Islands: 1.91 score (higher = more independent), 0.602 index (0-1)Sierra Leone: 1.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.571 index (0-1)El Salvador: 1.29 score (higher = more independent), 0.682 index (0-1)Somalia, Fed. Rep.: 0.418 score (higher = more independent), 0.87 index (0-1)Serbia: 0.38 score (higher = more independent), 0.794 index (0-1)Sao Tome and Principe: 0.609 score (higher = more independent), 0.289 index (0-1)Suriname: 1.9 score (higher = more independent), 0.172 index (0-1)Slovak Republic: 2.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.29 index (0-1)Slovenia: 1.97 score (higher = more independent), 0.078 index (0-1)Sweden: 2.77 score (higher = more independent), 0.009 index (0-1)Eswatini: -1.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.554 index (0-1)Seychelles: 1.75 score (higher = more independent), 0.054 index (0-1)Syrian Arab Republic: -0.732 score (higher = more independent), 0.619 index (0-1)Chad: 0.65 score (higher = more independent), 0.952 index (0-1)Togo: 0.357 score (higher = more independent), 0.757 index (0-1)Thailand: 1.45 score (higher = more independent), 0.635 index (0-1)Tajikistan: -1.2 score (higher = more independent), 0.893 index (0-1)Turkmenistan: -2.17 score (higher = more independent), 0.899 index (0-1)Timor-Leste: 1.41 score (higher = more independent), 0.25 index (0-1)Trinidad and Tobago: 1.94 score (higher = more independent), 0.1 index (0-1)Tunisia: 1.11 score (higher = more independent), 0.41 index (0-1)Turkiye: 0.86 score (higher = more independent), 0.804 index (0-1)Tanzania: 1.1 score (higher = more independent), 0.329 index (0-1)Uganda: 0.496 score (higher = more independent), 0.889 index (0-1)Ukraine: 0.717 score (higher = more independent), 0.641 index (0-1)Uruguay: 2.96 score (higher = more independent), 0.055 index (0-1)United States: 2.31 score (higher = more independent), 0.06 index (0-1)Uzbekistan: -1.46 score (higher = more independent), 0.823 index (0-1)Viet Nam: -3.37 score (higher = more independent), 0.466 index (0-1)Vanuatu: 1.49 score (higher = more independent), 0.332 index (0-1)Kosovo: 1.99 score (higher = more independent), 0.348 index (0-1)South Africa: 0.912 score (higher = more independent), 0.538 index (0-1)Zambia: 0.22 score (higher = more independent), 0.428 index (0-1)Zimbabwe: -0.068 score (higher = more independent), 0.852 index (0-1)AFGARECHLDNKHNDIRLLAOLBRMDGSAUTKMVNM

best-fit line line after adjusting

Four ways to measure the link

MethodrpCountries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted-0.5604.6e-15166
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted-0.6705.4e-23166
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income-0.4931.8e-11166
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income-0.5541.1e-14166

The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 166 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: +0.067 (a minus sign means it grew).

How solid is it?

Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from -0.517 (without ARE) to -0.477 (without TKM). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: ARE (-0.024).

Within each region

Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.

nr
East Asia & Pacific21-0.46
Europe & Central Asia49-0.71
Latin America & Caribbean23-0.59
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan19-0.12
Sub-Saharan Africa46-0.24

By income third

If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.

nr
Poorest third56-0.29
Middle third55-0.50
Richest third55-0.59

By largest religious group

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Christians99-0.48
Muslims46-0.21

By last European coloniser

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
France25-0.09
Never a European colony20-0.42
Spain19-0.61
United Kingdom48-0.50

By official ideology

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Nationalist24-0.61
No strong official ideology116-0.53

By party system

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
A few parties banned26-0.41
No parties banned121-0.57

Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = -0.552 after dropping 7 countries.

Two series, one country

Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.

Loading…

Over time, within countries

Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 36years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.

Within countries over time, there is no link that is clearly more than chance (r = -0.158, comparing each country only with itself over the years, and each year only with the same year elsewhere). Whatever the cross-country picture shows, countries whose independent opposition moved did not tend to see their political corruption move with it.

Across countries (adjusted)-0.493for comparison
Within countries-0.126each country vs itself
…and vs the same year elsewhere-0.158q = 0.115 · 172 countries
Year-on-year changes-0.037q = 0.698
Read with care.
  • Almost all of this indicator's variation is between countries, not within them, so the within-country estimate rests on a small part of the data.

6,066 country-years (one country in one year), 172 countries, 1990–2025, about 35 years each on average. Share of the variation that happens within countries over time: 7% for Independent opposition, 13% for Political corruption. The margins of error allow for each country appearing many times, and for each year’s value being close to the year before.

Year-to-year changes are a cautious test, not a final answer. Looking only at changes from one year to the next removes each country’s own trends. But it also makes measurement mistakes louder, which pulls the results toward zero. A near-zero result here is weak evidence of no link, not proof.

With one measure years behind the other

0.20−0.2-100+10years Political corruption trails Independent opposition →lag -10: r = -0.066 (n = 4,356)lag -9: r = -0.067 (n = 4,526)lag -8: r = -0.073 (n = 4,696)lag -7: r = -0.090 (n = 4,866)lag -6: r = -0.117 (n = 5,036)lag -5: r = -0.143 (n = 5,211)lag -4: r = -0.162 (n = 5,382)lag -3: r = -0.180 (n = 5,553)lag -2: r = -0.190 (n = 5,724)lag -1: r = -0.181 (n = 5,895)lag +0: r = -0.158 (n = 6,066)lag +1: r = -0.160 (n = 5,902)lag +2: r = -0.154 (n = 5,737)lag +3: r = -0.141 (n = 5,570)lag +4: r = -0.123 (n = 5,403)lag +5: r = -0.104 (n = 5,235)lag +6: r = -0.079 (n = 5,065)lag +7: r = -0.056 (n = 4,895)lag +8: r = -0.038 (n = 4,725)lag +9: r = -0.022 (n = 4,555)lag +10: r = -0.020 (n = 4,385)

Same year (lag 0): -0.158. A peak away from zero does not show which comes first. These series change slowly — this year’s value is close to last year’s. That makes the curve smooth and nearly symmetric, whatever produced the data. Even a sharp peak at one lag (a gap of some years) would not prove that one measure changes the other.

The data


score (higher = more independent)

index (0-1)
Years
Chile CHL3.130.0752025
Ireland IRL3.010.0322025
Uruguay URY2.960.0552025
Netherlands NLD2.860.0272025
Belgium BEL2.850.0312025
Latvia LVA2.840.072025
Slovak Republic SVK2.840.292025
Denmark DNK2.830.0042025
New Zealand NZL2.770.0142025
Sweden SWE2.770.0092025
Korea, Rep. KOR2.760.1562025
Spain ESP2.740.1132025
Italy ITA2.730.1572025
Austria AUT2.730.0952025
Switzerland CHE2.720.022025

Coppedge, M. et al., V-Dem Dataset v16, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project; Lindberg, S. I. et al., Varieties of Party Identity and Organization (V-Party) Dataset. Read from the V-Dem Institute's vdemdata package.
Coppedge, M. et al., V-Dem Dataset, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project

Sources

Independent opposition

Opposition parties' independence from the ruling regime

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · updated annual (V-Dem); V-Party per election, to 2019

Are opposition parties really independent, or picked or bought by the people in power? Experts answer from 0 ("opposition parties are not allowed") to 4 ("all opposition parties are independent"). V-Dem turns the answers into a score of about -4 to +4. A part of V-Dem's freedom of association index.

Political corruption

Political corruption index

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · via Our World in Data · CC BY-SA 4.0 · updated annual

Expert ratings of corruption across the government, parliament, courts and public sector. It runs the opposite way to the Corruption Perceptions Index, where higher means cleaner. So the two should move strongly in opposite directions. V-Dem is also one of the datasets Transparency International combines into that index.

How this was computed

Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2019–2025. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 17,292 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated V-Dem v16; V-Party v2. How the country data works · explore Independent opposition and Political corruption

This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that Independent opposition changes Political corruption, or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.

More links with Independent opposition or Political corruption