Do HDI and Hours worked (PWT) go together across countries?

Across 127 countries the link before adjusting for anything is r = -0.39, on a scale from -1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). A version that uses only each country's rank gives -0.46.

Does the link hold within countries over time, not just across countries?

Comparing each country only with itself across 1990-2023, and setting aside what happened worldwide in each year, the link is +0.200 (129 countries, 3,396 country-years). Using year-to-year changes, it is +0.106.

Does HDI cause Hours worked (PWT)?

This analysis cannot answer that. It shows only that the two go together. A link between two country measures, adjusted or not, does not show that either one changes the other. Country figures also say nothing about individual people.

HDI vs. Hours worked (PWT)

Holds up after adjusting for income

Across 127 countries, HDI and Hours worked (PWT) rise and fall together at r = -0.39 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). Comparing only countries with similar income (GDP per person) shrinks it to -0.21 (q = 0.050, allowing for the many pairs tested). Much of the first figure is that both measures rise with national income, but a weak negative link remains. Caution: direction is not consistent across regions.

Comparing countries across the middle half of hours worked (PWT), 1,647 to 2,178 hours per year, HDI is worse by 0.0956 points at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 0.0149 points.

Link before adjusting (r)-0.386p = 7.6e-6 · 127 countries

After adjusting for national income-0.214p = 0.016 · likely range [-0.38, -0.04]

p, allowing for regions0.011standard error 0.060 · 7 regions

Check for luck (q)0.050across 18,622 pairs

How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.

HDI · index, 0 to 1link with income +0.96 · proxy

Hours worked (PWT) · hours per yearlink with income -0.40 · moderate

“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.

Every country as a dot

best-fit line line after adjusting

Four ways to measure the link

Method	r	p	Countries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted	-0.386	7.6e-6	127
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted	-0.460	5.1e-8	127
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income	-0.214	0.016	127
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income	-0.328	0.000	127

The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 127 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: +0.171 (a minus sign means it grew).

How solid is it?

Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from -0.265 (without TCD) to -0.170 (without QAT). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: TCD (-0.051).

Fragile: this link may not hold up.

direction is not consistent across regions

Within each region

Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.

	n	r
East Asia & Pacific	14	-0.75
Europe & Central Asia	47	-0.55
Latin America & Caribbean	15	-0.17
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan	18	+0.06
Sub-Saharan Africa	28	-0.06

By income third

If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.

	n	r
Poorest third	43	-0.04
Middle third	42	-0.27
Richest third	42	-0.56

By largest religious group

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

	n	r
Christians	74	-0.27
Muslims	36	+0.10

By last European coloniser

	n	r
France	16	+0.06
Never a European colony	17	+0.14
Spain	14	-0.27
United Kingdom	35	-0.30

By official ideology

	n	r
Nationalist	21	-0.26
No strong official ideology	85	-0.25

By party system

	n	r
A few parties banned	18	-0.11
No parties banned	93	-0.18

Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = -0.214 after dropping 0 countries.

Two series, one country

Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.

Loading…

Over time, within countries

Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 34years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.

Within countries over time, there is no link that is clearly more than chance (r = +0.200, comparing each country only with itself over the years, and each year only with the same year elsewhere). Whatever the cross-country picture shows, countries whose HDI moved did not tend to see their hours worked (PWT) move with it.

Across countries (adjusted)-0.214for comparison

Within countries-0.352each country vs itself

…and vs the same year elsewhere+0.200q = 0.140 · 129 countries

Year-on-year changes+0.106q = 0.182

The direction flips. Comparing each country only with itself gives -0.35. Also taking out what happened to the whole world each year gives +0.20. So the first figure was picking up a trend both measures share with worldwide progress, not a link between them.

Read with care.

Almost all of this indicator's variation is between countries, not within them, so the within-country estimate rests on a small part of the data.

3,396 country-years (one country in one year), 129 countries, 1990–2023, about 26 years each on average. Share of the variation that happens within countries over time: 7% for HDI, 9% for Hours worked (PWT). The margins of error allow for each country appearing many times, and for each year’s value being close to the year before.

Year-to-year changes are a cautious test, not a final answer. Looking only at changes from one year to the next removes each country’s own trends. But it also makes measurement mistakes louder, which pulls the results toward zero. A near-zero result here is weak evidence of no link, not proof.

With one measure years behind the other

Same year (lag 0): +0.200. A peak away from zero does not show which comes first. These series change slowly — this year’s value is close to last year’s. That makes the curve smooth and nearly symmetric, whatever produced the data. Even a sharp peak at one lag (a gap of some years) would not prove that one measure changes the other.

The data

	index, 0 to 1	hours per year	Years
Iceland ISL	0.972	1,452	2023
Norway NOR	0.97	1,412	2023
Switzerland CHE	0.97	1,529	2023
Denmark DNK	0.962	1,380	2023
Sweden SWE	0.959	1,432	2023
Germany DEU	0.959	1,335	2023
Australia AUS	0.958	1,611	2023
Netherlands NLD	0.955	1,439	2023
Hong Kong SAR, China HKG	0.955	2,240	2023
Belgium BEL	0.951	1,593	2023
Ireland IRL	0.949	1,654	2023
Finland FIN	0.948	1,497	2023
Singapore SGP	0.946	2,283	2023
United Kingdom GBR	0.946	1,523	2023
United Arab Emirates ARE	0.94	2,514	2023

United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 2025
Feenstra, Robert C., Robert Inklaar and Marcel P. Timmer (2015), "The Next Generation of the Penn World Table", American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150-3182, www.ggdc.net/pwt. Data: Penn World Table version 11.0, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, doi:10.34894/FABVLR.

Sources

HDI

Human Development Index

United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report Office · via Our World in Data · CC BY 3.0 IGO · updated annual

The geometric mean (a kind of average that multiplies the parts together) of three parts: income per person (GNI per capita), life expectancy, and schooling (expected years and average years). All four inputs are on this site, and each is flagged. So a link between the HDI and any of them is shown for what it is: the index matching a part of itself. For the same reason it is kept out of this site's own topic scores. Those already contain its parts, and adding it would count each twice. It is the most-cited development index there is. It is here mostly so its parts can be read separately.

Hours worked (PWT)

Average annual hours worked per person engaged (Penn World Table)

Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen · via DataverseNL · CC BY 4.0 · updated irregular (new versions every few years)

Hours actually worked in a year, averaged over everyone with a job, including the self-employed and part-timers. It measures the same thing as the OECD hours measure, and for countries in both the two mostly agree. This one is kept because it reaches much further: about 130 countries each year from 2010 to 2023, where the OECD series has 38 countries and stops in 2016. Before 2000 it covers mainly rich countries. No "better" direction is set.

How this was computed

Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2023. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 18,622 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated V-Dem v16; V-Party v2. How the country data works · explore HDI and Hours worked (PWT)

This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that HDI changes Hours worked (PWT), or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.