placestats

Civil society participation vs. Legal system and property rights (Fraser)

Holds up after adjusting for income

Across 159 countries, Civil society participation and Legal system and property rights (Fraser) rise and fall together at r = +0.47 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). It holds up almost unchanged when only countries with similar income (GDP per person) are compared (r = +0.53, q = 0.028, allowing for the many pairs tested).

Comparing countries across the middle half of legal system and property rights (Fraser), 4.23 to 6.66 points, civil society participation is better by 0.15 points at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 0.266 points.

Link before adjusting (r)+0.474p = 2.8e-10 · 159 countries
After adjusting for national income+0.526p = 1.2e-12 · likely range [+0.40, +0.63]
p, allowing for regions0.001standard error 0.085 · 7 regions
Check for luck (q)0.028across 17,292 pairs

How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.

Civil society participation · index (0-1)link with income +0.29 · independent
Legal system and property rights (Fraser) · rating (0-10)link with income +0.81 · proxy

“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.

Every country as a dot

Civil society participation · index (0-1) →Legal system and property rights (Fraser) · rating (0-10) →0.0790.9791.929.1Angola: 0.433 index (0-1), 3.33 rating (0-10)Albania: 0.595 index (0-1), 5.61 rating (0-10)United Arab Emirates: 0.273 index (0-1), 7.09 rating (0-10)Argentina: 0.707 index (0-1), 5.15 rating (0-10)Armenia: 0.656 index (0-1), 5.86 rating (0-10)Australia: 0.928 index (0-1), 8.69 rating (0-10)Austria: 0.884 index (0-1), 8.46 rating (0-10)Azerbaijan: 0.079 index (0-1), 5.09 rating (0-10)Burundi: 0.314 index (0-1), 3.35 rating (0-10)Belgium: 0.947 index (0-1), 7.64 rating (0-10)Benin: 0.632 index (0-1), 4.41 rating (0-10)Burkina Faso: 0.636 index (0-1), 3.62 rating (0-10)Bangladesh: 0.696 index (0-1), 2.9 rating (0-10)Bulgaria: 0.858 index (0-1), 5.84 rating (0-10)Bahrain: 0.245 index (0-1), 5.25 rating (0-10)Bosnia and Herzegovina: 0.662 index (0-1), 4.59 rating (0-10)Belarus: 0.112 index (0-1), 4.28 rating (0-10)Bolivia: 0.845 index (0-1), 3.95 rating (0-10)Brazil: 0.865 index (0-1), 5.34 rating (0-10)Barbados: 0.896 index (0-1), 5.62 rating (0-10)Bhutan: 0.694 index (0-1), 6.73 rating (0-10)Botswana: 0.856 index (0-1), 6.24 rating (0-10)Central African Republic: 0.337 index (0-1), 2.03 rating (0-10)Canada: 0.938 index (0-1), 8.31 rating (0-10)Switzerland: 0.971 index (0-1), 8.98 rating (0-10)Chile: 0.775 index (0-1), 6.96 rating (0-10)China: 0.219 index (0-1), 4.73 rating (0-10)Cote d'Ivoire: 0.707 index (0-1), 5.13 rating (0-10)Cameroon: 0.467 index (0-1), 2.86 rating (0-10)Congo, Dem. Rep.: 0.515 index (0-1), 2.68 rating (0-10)Congo, Rep.: 0.566 index (0-1), 3.1 rating (0-10)Colombia: 0.787 index (0-1), 5.06 rating (0-10)Comoros: 0.545 index (0-1), 3.17 rating (0-10)Cabo Verde: 0.683 index (0-1), 6.33 rating (0-10)Costa Rica: 0.883 index (0-1), 6.62 rating (0-10)Cyprus: 0.827 index (0-1), 6.7 rating (0-10)Czechia: 0.777 index (0-1), 7.64 rating (0-10)Germany: 0.979 index (0-1), 8.03 rating (0-10)Djibouti: 0.439 index (0-1), 3.6 rating (0-10)Denmark: 0.971 index (0-1), 9.09 rating (0-10)Dominican Republic: 0.823 index (0-1), 5.29 rating (0-10)Algeria: 0.302 index (0-1), 3.91 rating (0-10)Ecuador: 0.69 index (0-1), 4.87 rating (0-10)Egypt, Arab Rep.: 0.212 index (0-1), 3.36 rating (0-10)Spain: 0.891 index (0-1), 7.36 rating (0-10)Estonia: 0.89 index (0-1), 8.01 rating (0-10)Ethiopia: 0.629 index (0-1), 4.25 rating (0-10)Finland: 0.948 index (0-1), 8.88 rating (0-10)Fiji: 0.846 index (0-1), 4.87 rating (0-10)France: 0.866 index (0-1), 7.41 rating (0-10)Gabon: 0.714 index (0-1), 3.73 rating (0-10)United Kingdom: 0.889 index (0-1), 7.92 rating (0-10)Georgia: 0.552 index (0-1), 6.09 rating (0-10)Ghana: 0.893 index (0-1), 5.25 rating (0-10)Guinea: 0.531 index (0-1), 3.54 rating (0-10)Gambia, The: 0.8 index (0-1), 4.91 rating (0-10)Guinea-Bissau: 0.78 index (0-1), 2.77 rating (0-10)Greece: 0.752 index (0-1), 6.22 rating (0-10)Guatemala: 0.761 index (0-1), 4.78 rating (0-10)Guyana: 0.768 index (0-1), 5.09 rating (0-10)Hong Kong SAR, China: 0.4 index (0-1), 7.57 rating (0-10)Honduras: 0.754 index (0-1), 4.11 rating (0-10)Croatia: 0.694 index (0-1), 6.2 rating (0-10)Haiti: 0.478 index (0-1), 2.44 rating (0-10)Hungary: 0.434 index (0-1), 6.69 rating (0-10)Indonesia: 0.711 index (0-1), 4.54 rating (0-10)India: 0.694 index (0-1), 5.28 rating (0-10)Ireland: 0.954 index (0-1), 8.07 rating (0-10)Iran, Islamic Rep.: 0.154 index (0-1), 3.4 rating (0-10)Iraq: 0.697 index (0-1), 2.44 rating (0-10)Iceland: 0.874 index (0-1), 8.81 rating (0-10)Israel: 0.803 index (0-1), 6.14 rating (0-10)Italy: 0.882 index (0-1), 6.74 rating (0-10)Jamaica: 0.777 index (0-1), 5.83 rating (0-10)Jordan: 0.646 index (0-1), 4.62 rating (0-10)Japan: 0.683 index (0-1), 7.93 rating (0-10)Kazakhstan: 0.418 index (0-1), 5.72 rating (0-10)Kenya: 0.718 index (0-1), 4.73 rating (0-10)Kyrgyz Republic: 0.374 index (0-1), 4.58 rating (0-10)Cambodia: 0.268 index (0-1), 3.92 rating (0-10)Korea, Rep.: 0.804 index (0-1), 6.81 rating (0-10)Kuwait: 0.473 index (0-1), 5.25 rating (0-10)Lao PDR: 0.229 index (0-1), 4.54 rating (0-10)Lebanon: 0.811 index (0-1), 3.59 rating (0-10)Liberia: 0.899 index (0-1), 3.91 rating (0-10)Libya: 0.631 index (0-1), 2.67 rating (0-10)Sri Lanka: 0.805 index (0-1), 5.12 rating (0-10)Lesotho: 0.742 index (0-1), 4.76 rating (0-10)Lithuania: 0.831 index (0-1), 7.67 rating (0-10)Luxembourg: 0.954 index (0-1), 8.63 rating (0-10)Latvia: 0.892 index (0-1), 7.61 rating (0-10)Morocco: 0.651 index (0-1), 5.31 rating (0-10)Moldova: 0.787 index (0-1), 5.77 rating (0-10)Madagascar: 0.686 index (0-1), 3.08 rating (0-10)Mexico: 0.49 index (0-1), 4.27 rating (0-10)North Macedonia: 0.541 index (0-1), 4.72 rating (0-10)Mali: 0.7 index (0-1), 3.53 rating (0-10)Malta: 0.82 index (0-1), 6.89 rating (0-10)Myanmar: 0.128 index (0-1), 3.27 rating (0-10)Montenegro: 0.708 index (0-1), 5.68 rating (0-10)Mongolia: 0.677 index (0-1), 6.06 rating (0-10)Mozambique: 0.705 index (0-1), 4.7 rating (0-10)Mauritania: 0.63 index (0-1), 3.39 rating (0-10)Mauritius: 0.854 index (0-1), 6.87 rating (0-10)Malawi: 0.931 index (0-1), 4.72 rating (0-10)Malaysia: 0.755 index (0-1), 5.95 rating (0-10)Namibia: 0.667 index (0-1), 5.93 rating (0-10)Niger: 0.82 index (0-1), 3.62 rating (0-10)Nigeria: 0.786 index (0-1), 3.63 rating (0-10)Nicaragua: 0.114 index (0-1), 3.49 rating (0-10)Netherlands: 0.826 index (0-1), 8.56 rating (0-10)Norway: 0.973 index (0-1), 9.05 rating (0-10)Nepal: 0.858 index (0-1), 4.83 rating (0-10)New Zealand: 0.656 index (0-1), 9.1 rating (0-10)Oman: 0.318 index (0-1), 5.7 rating (0-10)Pakistan: 0.651 index (0-1), 3.74 rating (0-10)Panama: 0.632 index (0-1), 5.79 rating (0-10)Peru: 0.706 index (0-1), 5.19 rating (0-10)Philippines: 0.666 index (0-1), 4.72 rating (0-10)Papua New Guinea: 0.604 index (0-1), 4.72 rating (0-10)Poland: 0.729 index (0-1), 6.76 rating (0-10)Portugal: 0.711 index (0-1), 7.41 rating (0-10)Paraguay: 0.484 index (0-1), 4.47 rating (0-10)Qatar: 0.181 index (0-1), 5.6 rating (0-10)Romania: 0.656 index (0-1), 6.69 rating (0-10)Russian Federation: 0.202 index (0-1), 4.86 rating (0-10)Rwanda: 0.402 index (0-1), 6.07 rating (0-10)Saudi Arabia: 0.25 index (0-1), 6.22 rating (0-10)Sudan: 0.256 index (0-1), 1.92 rating (0-10)Senegal: 0.874 index (0-1), 4.28 rating (0-10)Singapore: 0.412 index (0-1), 8.47 rating (0-10)Sierra Leone: 0.902 index (0-1), 4.61 rating (0-10)El Salvador: 0.407 index (0-1), 4.33 rating (0-10)Somalia, Fed. Rep.: 0.68 index (0-1), 2.19 rating (0-10)Serbia: 0.525 index (0-1), 5.38 rating (0-10)Suriname: 0.829 index (0-1), 4.3 rating (0-10)Slovak Republic: 0.662 index (0-1), 6.74 rating (0-10)Slovenia: 0.907 index (0-1), 7.11 rating (0-10)Sweden: 0.939 index (0-1), 8.3 rating (0-10)Eswatini: 0.383 index (0-1), 3.11 rating (0-10)Seychelles: 0.858 index (0-1), 6.44 rating (0-10)Syrian Arab Republic: 0.347 index (0-1), 2.51 rating (0-10)Chad: 0.392 index (0-1), 2.42 rating (0-10)Togo: 0.631 index (0-1), 5.03 rating (0-10)Thailand: 0.641 index (0-1), 5.37 rating (0-10)Tajikistan: 0.153 index (0-1), 4.2 rating (0-10)Timor-Leste: 0.754 index (0-1), 3.9 rating (0-10)Trinidad and Tobago: 0.907 index (0-1), 5.18 rating (0-10)Tunisia: 0.478 index (0-1), 4.54 rating (0-10)Turkiye: 0.355 index (0-1), 4.91 rating (0-10)Tanzania: 0.793 index (0-1), 5.11 rating (0-10)Uganda: 0.698 index (0-1), 4.66 rating (0-10)Ukraine: 0.726 index (0-1), 4.57 rating (0-10)Uruguay: 0.845 index (0-1), 6.09 rating (0-10)United States: 0.963 index (0-1), 7.88 rating (0-10)Viet Nam: 0.666 index (0-1), 5.11 rating (0-10)South Africa: 0.776 index (0-1), 5.72 rating (0-10)Zambia: 0.918 index (0-1), 4.96 rating (0-10)Zimbabwe: 0.757 index (0-1), 3.63 rating (0-10)ARECHEDNKGNBHKGLBRMMRNICNORSDNSGPSOM

best-fit line line after adjusting

Four ways to measure the link

MethodrpCountries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted+0.4742.8e-10159
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted+0.5097.5e-12159
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income+0.5261.2e-12159
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income+0.4869.9e-11159

The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 159 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: -0.053 (a minus sign means it grew).

How solid is it?

Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from +0.512 (without QAT) to +0.550 (without RWA). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: RWA (+0.024).

Within each region

Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.

nr
East Asia & Pacific19+0.34
Europe & Central Asia46+0.61
Latin America & Caribbean23+0.43
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan20+0.32
Sub-Saharan Africa44+0.50

By income third

If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.

nr
Poorest third53+0.45
Middle third53+0.47
Richest third53+0.64

By largest religious group

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Christians95+0.55
Muslims43+0.24

By last European coloniser

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
France25+0.39
Never a European colony18+0.72
Spain18+0.50
United Kingdom47+0.49

By official ideology

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Nationalist23+0.38
No strong official ideology111+0.51

By party system

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
A few parties banned26+0.31
No parties banned116+0.45

Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = +0.526 after dropping 0 countries.

Two series, one country

Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.

Loading…

Over time, within countries

Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 35years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.

The link also shows up within countries over time (r = +0.168). It holds even when looking only at changes from one year to the next (r = +0.124). This is the strongest kind of evidence available here: it holds when each country is compared only with itself, and it is not just a product of shared trends.

Across countries (adjusted)+0.526for comparison
Within countries+0.202each country vs itself
…and vs the same year elsewhere+0.168q = 0.002 · 162 countries
Year-on-year changes+0.124q = 0.001
Read with care.
  • Almost all of this indicator's variation is between countries, not within them, so the within-country estimate rests on a small part of the data.

4,307 country-years (one country in one year), 162 countries, 1990–2024, about 27 years each on average. Share of the variation that happens within countries over time: 4% for Civil society participation, 16% for Legal system and property rights (Fraser). The margins of error allow for each country appearing many times, and for each year’s value being close to the year before.

Year-to-year changes are a cautious test, not a final answer. Looking only at changes from one year to the next removes each country’s own trends. But it also makes measurement mistakes louder, which pulls the results toward zero. A near-zero result here is weak evidence of no link, not proof.

With one measure years behind the other

0.20−0.2-100+10years Legal system and property rights (Fraser) trails Civil society participation →lag -10: r = 0.019 (n = 2,861)lag -9: r = 0.020 (n = 3,020)lag -8: r = 0.044 (n = 3,179)lag -7: r = 0.055 (n = 3,338)lag -6: r = 0.063 (n = 3,497)lag -5: r = 0.076 (n = 3,656)lag -4: r = 0.090 (n = 3,815)lag -3: r = 0.114 (n = 3,974)lag -2: r = 0.140 (n = 4,147)lag -1: r = 0.156 (n = 4,309)lag +0: r = 0.168 (n = 4,307)lag +1: r = 0.176 (n = 4,151)lag +2: r = 0.172 (n = 4,151)lag +3: r = 0.173 (n = 4,150)lag +4: r = 0.178 (n = 4,149)lag +5: r = 0.171 (n = 4,146)lag +6: r = 0.174 (n = 3,989)lag +7: r = 0.172 (n = 3,988)lag +8: r = 0.170 (n = 3,987)lag +9: r = 0.168 (n = 3,986)lag +10: r = 0.172 (n = 3,983)

Same year (lag 0): +0.168. A peak away from zero does not show which comes first. These series change slowly — this year’s value is close to last year’s. That makes the curve smooth and nearly symmetric, whatever produced the data. Even a sharp peak at one lag (a gap of some years) would not prove that one measure changes the other.

The data


index (0-1)

rating (0-10)
Years
Germany DEU0.9798.032025, 2024
Norway NOR0.9739.052025, 2024
Denmark DNK0.9719.092025, 2024
Switzerland CHE0.9718.982025, 2024
United States USA0.9637.882025, 2024
Luxembourg LUX0.9548.632025, 2024
Ireland IRL0.9548.072025, 2024
Finland FIN0.9488.882025, 2024
Belgium BEL0.9477.642025, 2024
Sweden SWE0.9398.32025, 2024
Canada CAN0.9388.312025, 2024
Malawi MWI0.9314.722025, 2024
Australia AUS0.9288.692025, 2024
Zambia ZMB0.9184.962025, 2024
Trinidad and Tobago TTO0.9075.182025, 2024

Coppedge, M. et al., V-Dem Dataset, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Murphy, R. and others, Economic Freedom of the World: 2026 Annual Report, Fraser Institute. Data from the EFW panel dataset (efotw-2026-master-index-data-for-researchers-iso.xlsx).

Sources

Civil society participation

Civil society participation index

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · via Our World in Data · CC BY-SA 4.0 · updated annual

How far governments consult civic groups, and how widely people take part in them. A part of the participatory democracy index.

Legal system and property rights (Fraser)

Economic freedom, area 2, legal system and property rights (Fraser Institute)

Fraser Institute · No licence stated; used with citation · updated annual

Whether courts are independent and fair, contracts are enforced, property is protected and the police are reliable, from 0 to 10. It draws on some of the same expert sources as other rule-of-law measures, so expect it to track them closely.

How this was computed

Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2024–2025. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 17,292 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated V-Dem v16; V-Party v2. How the country data works · explore Civil society participation and Legal system and property rights (Fraser)

This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that Civil society participation changes Legal system and property rights (Fraser), or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.

More links with Civil society participation or Legal system and property rights (Fraser)