placestats

Independent opposition vs. Women's political empowerment

Holds up after adjusting for income

Across 166 countries, Independent opposition and Women's political empowerment rise and fall together at r = +0.71 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). It holds up almost unchanged when only countries with similar income (GDP per person) are compared (r = +0.67, q = 0.018, allowing for the many pairs tested).

Comparing countries across the middle half of women's political empowerment, 0.628 to 0.874 points, independent opposition is better by 1.41 points at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 1.45 points.

Link before adjusting (r)+0.707p = 2.0e-26 · 166 countries
After adjusting for national income+0.668p = 1.2e-22 · likely range [+0.57, +0.74]
p, allowing for regions0.004standard error 0.148 · 7 regions
Check for luck (q)0.018across 17,292 pairs

How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.

Independent opposition · score (higher = more independent)link with income +0.45 · moderate
Women's political empowerment · index (0-1)link with income +0.54 · moderate

“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.

Every country as a dot

Independent opposition · score (higher = more independent) →Women's political empowerment · index (0-1) →-3.373.130.0280.954Afghanistan: -2.89 score (higher = more independent), 0.028 index (0-1)Angola: 0.728 score (higher = more independent), 0.77 index (0-1)Albania: 1.24 score (higher = more independent), 0.893 index (0-1)United Arab Emirates: -2.46 score (higher = more independent), 0.614 index (0-1)Argentina: 1.74 score (higher = more independent), 0.832 index (0-1)Armenia: 1.46 score (higher = more independent), 0.875 index (0-1)Australia: 2.62 score (higher = more independent), 0.906 index (0-1)Austria: 2.73 score (higher = more independent), 0.905 index (0-1)Azerbaijan: -0.517 score (higher = more independent), 0.649 index (0-1)Burundi: -0.573 score (higher = more independent), 0.653 index (0-1)Belgium: 2.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.952 index (0-1)Benin: 0.386 score (higher = more independent), 0.882 index (0-1)Burkina Faso: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.602 index (0-1)Bangladesh: 0.499 score (higher = more independent), 0.537 index (0-1)Bulgaria: 1.59 score (higher = more independent), 0.907 index (0-1)Bahrain: -1.25 score (higher = more independent), 0.568 index (0-1)Bosnia and Herzegovina: 0.781 score (higher = more independent), 0.821 index (0-1)Belarus: -1.6 score (higher = more independent), 0.657 index (0-1)Bolivia: 1.96 score (higher = more independent), 0.84 index (0-1)Brazil: 2.58 score (higher = more independent), 0.818 index (0-1)Barbados: 2.44 score (higher = more independent), 0.895 index (0-1)Bhutan: 1.31 score (higher = more independent), 0.675 index (0-1)Botswana: 1.66 score (higher = more independent), 0.699 index (0-1)Central African Republic: 0.683 score (higher = more independent), 0.556 index (0-1)Canada: 2.51 score (higher = more independent), 0.872 index (0-1)Switzerland: 2.72 score (higher = more independent), 0.93 index (0-1)Chile: 3.13 score (higher = more independent), 0.913 index (0-1)China: -2.28 score (higher = more independent), 0.587 index (0-1)Cote d'Ivoire: 1.24 score (higher = more independent), 0.696 index (0-1)Cameroon: -0.371 score (higher = more independent), 0.76 index (0-1)Congo, Dem. Rep.: 0.573 score (higher = more independent), 0.55 index (0-1)Congo, Rep.: 0.508 score (higher = more independent), 0.466 index (0-1)Colombia: 2.26 score (higher = more independent), 0.777 index (0-1)Comoros: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.556 index (0-1)Cabo Verde: 2.53 score (higher = more independent), 0.855 index (0-1)Costa Rica: 1.98 score (higher = more independent), 0.907 index (0-1)Cyprus: 2.54 score (higher = more independent), 0.856 index (0-1)Czechia: 2.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.93 index (0-1)Germany: 2.66 score (higher = more independent), 0.942 index (0-1)Djibouti: 0.062 score (higher = more independent), 0.584 index (0-1)Denmark: 2.83 score (higher = more independent), 0.954 index (0-1)Dominican Republic: 1.51 score (higher = more independent), 0.825 index (0-1)Algeria: -0.094 score (higher = more independent), 0.625 index (0-1)Ecuador: 1.73 score (higher = more independent), 0.79 index (0-1)Egypt, Arab Rep.: -0.965 score (higher = more independent), 0.547 index (0-1)Spain: 2.74 score (higher = more independent), 0.943 index (0-1)Estonia: 2.71 score (higher = more independent), 0.941 index (0-1)Ethiopia: -0.535 score (higher = more independent), 0.691 index (0-1)Finland: 2.65 score (higher = more independent), 0.932 index (0-1)Fiji: 1.7 score (higher = more independent), 0.644 index (0-1)France: 2.59 score (higher = more independent), 0.929 index (0-1)Gabon: 0.682 score (higher = more independent), 0.798 index (0-1)United Kingdom: 2.26 score (higher = more independent), 0.838 index (0-1)Georgia: 1.28 score (higher = more independent), 0.816 index (0-1)Ghana: 2.04 score (higher = more independent), 0.767 index (0-1)Guinea: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.532 index (0-1)Gambia, The: 0.787 score (higher = more independent), 0.813 index (0-1)Guinea-Bissau: 0.862 score (higher = more independent), 0.502 index (0-1)Equatorial Guinea: -0.253 score (higher = more independent), 0.449 index (0-1)Greece: 2.08 score (higher = more independent), 0.896 index (0-1)Guatemala: 2.17 score (higher = more independent), 0.722 index (0-1)Guyana: 0.768 score (higher = more independent), 0.81 index (0-1)Hong Kong SAR, China: -0.864 score (higher = more independent), 0.801 index (0-1)Honduras: 2.1 score (higher = more independent), 0.789 index (0-1)Croatia: 1.5 score (higher = more independent), 0.913 index (0-1)Haiti: 0.187 score (higher = more independent), 0.403 index (0-1)Hungary: 0.224 score (higher = more independent), 0.818 index (0-1)Indonesia: 0.469 score (higher = more independent), 0.726 index (0-1)India: 1.58 score (higher = more independent), 0.658 index (0-1)Ireland: 3.01 score (higher = more independent), 0.927 index (0-1)Iran, Islamic Rep.: -1.75 score (higher = more independent), 0.32 index (0-1)Iraq: 0.313 score (higher = more independent), 0.555 index (0-1)Iceland: 2.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.883 index (0-1)Israel: 2.35 score (higher = more independent), 0.862 index (0-1)Italy: 2.73 score (higher = more independent), 0.929 index (0-1)Jamaica: 2 score (higher = more independent), 0.929 index (0-1)Jordan: 0.662 score (higher = more independent), 0.669 index (0-1)Japan: 1.92 score (higher = more independent), 0.844 index (0-1)Kazakhstan: -0.551 score (higher = more independent), 0.682 index (0-1)Kenya: 1.39 score (higher = more independent), 0.804 index (0-1)Kyrgyz Republic: -0.721 score (higher = more independent), 0.733 index (0-1)Cambodia: -0.704 score (higher = more independent), 0.534 index (0-1)Korea, Rep.: 2.76 score (higher = more independent), 0.878 index (0-1)Kuwait: -0.978 score (higher = more independent), 0.357 index (0-1)Lao PDR: -2.8 score (higher = more independent), 0.508 index (0-1)Lebanon: 0.53 score (higher = more independent), 0.608 index (0-1)Liberia: 1.66 score (higher = more independent), 0.823 index (0-1)Libya: 0.783 score (higher = more independent), 0.412 index (0-1)Sri Lanka: 1.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.742 index (0-1)Lesotho: 1.97 score (higher = more independent), 0.809 index (0-1)Lithuania: 2.13 score (higher = more independent), 0.926 index (0-1)Luxembourg: 2.33 score (higher = more independent), 0.896 index (0-1)Latvia: 2.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.95 index (0-1)Morocco: 0.63 score (higher = more independent), 0.712 index (0-1)Moldova: 2.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.898 index (0-1)Madagascar: 1.98 score (higher = more independent), 0.704 index (0-1)Maldives: 1.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.532 index (0-1)Mexico: 0.679 score (higher = more independent), 0.801 index (0-1)North Macedonia: 1.03 score (higher = more independent), 0.824 index (0-1)Mali: 1.33 score (higher = more independent), 0.706 index (0-1)Malta: 2.64 score (higher = more independent), 0.917 index (0-1)Myanmar: -1.3 score (higher = more independent), 0.33 index (0-1)Montenegro: 1.74 score (higher = more independent), 0.866 index (0-1)Mongolia: 1.3 score (higher = more independent), 0.806 index (0-1)Mozambique: 0.615 score (higher = more independent), 0.725 index (0-1)Mauritania: -0.206 score (higher = more independent), 0.541 index (0-1)Mauritius: 1.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.814 index (0-1)Malawi: 1.27 score (higher = more independent), 0.755 index (0-1)Malaysia: 1.76 score (higher = more independent), 0.772 index (0-1)Namibia: 2.53 score (higher = more independent), 0.855 index (0-1)Niger: 2.33 score (higher = more independent), 0.709 index (0-1)Nigeria: 1.5 score (higher = more independent), 0.732 index (0-1)Nicaragua: -1.89 score (higher = more independent), 0.531 index (0-1)Netherlands: 2.86 score (higher = more independent), 0.903 index (0-1)Norway: 2.19 score (higher = more independent), 0.926 index (0-1)Nepal: 2.55 score (higher = more independent), 0.792 index (0-1)New Zealand: 2.77 score (higher = more independent), 0.937 index (0-1)Pakistan: 0.106 score (higher = more independent), 0.524 index (0-1)Panama: 1.83 score (higher = more independent), 0.742 index (0-1)Peru: 1.6 score (higher = more independent), 0.775 index (0-1)Philippines: 0.797 score (higher = more independent), 0.81 index (0-1)Papua New Guinea: 2.01 score (higher = more independent), 0.48 index (0-1)Poland: 1.93 score (higher = more independent), 0.878 index (0-1)Portugal: 1.72 score (higher = more independent), 0.811 index (0-1)Paraguay: 1.43 score (higher = more independent), 0.669 index (0-1)Romania: 1.96 score (higher = more independent), 0.872 index (0-1)Russian Federation: -1.45 score (higher = more independent), 0.546 index (0-1)Rwanda: -1.38 score (higher = more independent), 0.626 index (0-1)Saudi Arabia: -2.61 score (higher = more independent), 0.347 index (0-1)Sudan: 0.09 score (higher = more independent), 0.219 index (0-1)Senegal: 0.71 score (higher = more independent), 0.855 index (0-1)Singapore: 1.89 score (higher = more independent), 0.785 index (0-1)Solomon Islands: 1.91 score (higher = more independent), 0.675 index (0-1)Sierra Leone: 1.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.801 index (0-1)El Salvador: 1.29 score (higher = more independent), 0.587 index (0-1)Somalia, Fed. Rep.: 0.418 score (higher = more independent), 0.337 index (0-1)Serbia: 0.38 score (higher = more independent), 0.864 index (0-1)Sao Tome and Principe: 0.609 score (higher = more independent), 0.843 index (0-1)Suriname: 1.9 score (higher = more independent), 0.877 index (0-1)Slovak Republic: 2.84 score (higher = more independent), 0.878 index (0-1)Slovenia: 1.97 score (higher = more independent), 0.94 index (0-1)Sweden: 2.77 score (higher = more independent), 0.923 index (0-1)Eswatini: -1.85 score (higher = more independent), 0.391 index (0-1)Seychelles: 1.75 score (higher = more independent), 0.908 index (0-1)Syrian Arab Republic: -0.732 score (higher = more independent), 0.29 index (0-1)Chad: 0.65 score (higher = more independent), 0.625 index (0-1)Togo: 0.357 score (higher = more independent), 0.692 index (0-1)Thailand: 1.45 score (higher = more independent), 0.688 index (0-1)Tajikistan: -1.2 score (higher = more independent), 0.431 index (0-1)Turkmenistan: -2.17 score (higher = more independent), 0.437 index (0-1)Timor-Leste: 1.41 score (higher = more independent), 0.768 index (0-1)Trinidad and Tobago: 1.94 score (higher = more independent), 0.874 index (0-1)Tunisia: 1.11 score (higher = more independent), 0.765 index (0-1)Turkiye: 0.86 score (higher = more independent), 0.558 index (0-1)Tanzania: 1.1 score (higher = more independent), 0.834 index (0-1)Uganda: 0.496 score (higher = more independent), 0.636 index (0-1)Ukraine: 0.717 score (higher = more independent), 0.888 index (0-1)Uruguay: 2.96 score (higher = more independent), 0.875 index (0-1)United States: 2.31 score (higher = more independent), 0.829 index (0-1)Uzbekistan: -1.46 score (higher = more independent), 0.643 index (0-1)Viet Nam: -3.37 score (higher = more independent), 0.808 index (0-1)Vanuatu: 1.49 score (higher = more independent), 0.715 index (0-1)Kosovo: 1.99 score (higher = more independent), 0.771 index (0-1)South Africa: 0.912 score (higher = more independent), 0.83 index (0-1)Zambia: 0.22 score (higher = more independent), 0.791 index (0-1)Zimbabwe: -0.068 score (higher = more independent), 0.727 index (0-1)AFGAREBELDNKHKGIRNLVAPNGSAUSDNSOMVNM

best-fit line line after adjusting

Four ways to measure the link

MethodrpCountries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted+0.7072.0e-26166
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted+0.7541.1e-31166
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income+0.6681.2e-22166
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income+0.6762.1e-23166

The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 166 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: +0.039 (a minus sign means it grew).

How solid is it?

Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from +0.646 (without SAU) to +0.701 (without VNM). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: VNM (+0.033).

Within each region

Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.

nr
East Asia & Pacific21+0.46
Europe & Central Asia49+0.79
Latin America & Caribbean23+0.66
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan19+0.84
Sub-Saharan Africa46+0.47

By income third

If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.

nr
Poorest third56+0.59
Middle third55+0.59
Richest third55+0.86

By largest religious group

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Christians99+0.57
Muslims46+0.68

By last European coloniser

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
France25+0.28
Never a European colony20+0.82
Spain19+0.67
United Kingdom48+0.67

By official ideology

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Nationalist24+0.77
No strong official ideology116+0.54

By party system

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
A few parties banned26+0.47
No parties banned121+0.36

Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = +0.649 after dropping 8 countries.

Two series, one country

Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.

Loading…

Over time, within countries

Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 36years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.

The link also shows up within countries over time (r = +0.421). It holds even when looking only at changes from one year to the next (r = +0.237). This is the strongest kind of evidence available here: it holds when each country is compared only with itself, and it is not just a product of shared trends.

Across countries (adjusted)+0.668for comparison
Within countries+0.457each country vs itself
…and vs the same year elsewhere+0.421q = 0.000 · 171 countries
Year-on-year changes+0.237q = 1.0e-5

6,050 country-years (one country in one year), 171 countries, 1990–2025, about 35 years each on average. Share of the variation that happens within countries over time: 14% for Independent opposition, 13% for Women's political empowerment. The margins of error allow for each country appearing many times, and for each year’s value being close to the year before.

Year-to-year changes are a cautious test, not a final answer. Looking only at changes from one year to the next removes each country’s own trends. But it also makes measurement mistakes louder, which pulls the results toward zero. A near-zero result here is weak evidence of no link, not proof.

With one measure years behind the other

0.50−0.5-100+10years Women's political empowerment trails Independent opposition →lag -10: r = 0.011 (n = 4,378)lag -9: r = 0.032 (n = 4,545)lag -8: r = 0.062 (n = 4,713)lag -7: r = 0.095 (n = 4,881)lag -6: r = 0.132 (n = 5,049)lag -5: r = 0.175 (n = 5,217)lag -4: r = 0.229 (n = 5,385)lag -3: r = 0.279 (n = 5,553)lag -2: r = 0.339 (n = 5,720)lag -1: r = 0.386 (n = 5,886)lag +0: r = 0.421 (n = 6,050)lag +1: r = 0.394 (n = 5,884)lag +2: r = 0.342 (n = 5,719)lag +3: r = 0.295 (n = 5,552)lag +4: r = 0.259 (n = 5,385)lag +5: r = 0.218 (n = 5,217)lag +6: r = 0.188 (n = 5,048)lag +7: r = 0.156 (n = 4,879)lag +8: r = 0.121 (n = 4,710)lag +9: r = 0.092 (n = 4,545)lag +10: r = 0.072 (n = 4,376)

Same year (lag 0): +0.421. A peak away from zero does not show which comes first. These series change slowly — this year’s value is close to last year’s. That makes the curve smooth and nearly symmetric, whatever produced the data. Even a sharp peak at one lag (a gap of some years) would not prove that one measure changes the other.

The data


score (higher = more independent)

index (0-1)
Years
Chile CHL3.130.9132025
Ireland IRL3.010.9272025
Uruguay URY2.960.8752025
Netherlands NLD2.860.9032025
Belgium BEL2.850.9522025
Latvia LVA2.840.952025
Slovak Republic SVK2.840.8782025
Denmark DNK2.830.9542025
New Zealand NZL2.770.9372025
Sweden SWE2.770.9232025
Korea, Rep. KOR2.760.8782025
Spain ESP2.740.9432025
Italy ITA2.730.9292025
Austria AUT2.730.9052025
Switzerland CHE2.720.932025

Coppedge, M. et al., V-Dem Dataset v16, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project; Lindberg, S. I. et al., Varieties of Party Identity and Organization (V-Party) Dataset. Read from the V-Dem Institute's vdemdata package.
Coppedge, M. et al., V-Dem Dataset, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project

Sources

Independent opposition

Opposition parties' independence from the ruling regime

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · updated annual (V-Dem); V-Party per election, to 2019

Are opposition parties really independent, or picked or bought by the people in power? Experts answer from 0 ("opposition parties are not allowed") to 4 ("all opposition parties are independent"). V-Dem turns the answers into a score of about -4 to +4. A part of V-Dem's freedom of association index.

Women's political empowerment

Women's political empowerment index

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · via Our World in Data · CC BY-SA 4.0 · updated annual

Women's civil liberties, their part in civic groups, and their political representation. It is built from its own set of questions, not from the parts of the democracy indices, so it is not tagged as measuring the same thing. Still, read its links with them carefully. Whether women take part in politics is partly built into whether real political participation exists at all. So a strong link with general democracy measures is closer to definitional (true by how the terms are defined) than to a finding about the world.

How this was computed

Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2019–2025. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 17,292 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated V-Dem v16; V-Party v2. How the country data works · explore Independent opposition and Women's political empowerment

This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that Independent opposition changes Women's political empowerment, or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.

More links with Independent opposition or Women's political empowerment