placestats

Government expense vs. Independent opposition

Holds up after adjusting for income

Across 137 countries, Government expense and Independent opposition rise and fall together at r = +0.42 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). It holds up almost unchanged when only countries with similar income (GDP per person) are compared (r = +0.29, q = 0.033, allowing for the many pairs tested).

Comparing countries across the middle half of independent opposition, 0.53 to 2.26 points, government expense is 5.78% of GDP higher at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 3.81% of GDP.

Link before adjusting (r)+0.424p = 2.5e-7 · 137 countries
After adjusting for national income+0.288p = 0.001 · likely range [+0.13, +0.44]
p, allowing for regions0.005standard error 0.067 · 7 regions
Check for luck (q)0.033across 17,292 pairs

How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.

Government expense · % of GDPlink with income +0.44 · moderate
Independent opposition · score (higher = more independent)link with income +0.45 · moderate

“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.

Every country as a dot

Government expense · % of GDP →Independent opposition · score (higher = more independent) →3.77%65.6%-2.893.13Afghanistan: 39.2% of GDP, -2.89 score (higher = more independent)Angola: 14.6% of GDP, 0.728 score (higher = more independent)Albania: 25.4% of GDP, 1.24 score (higher = more independent)United Arab Emirates: 3.77% of GDP, -2.46 score (higher = more independent)Argentina: 21% of GDP, 1.74 score (higher = more independent)Armenia: 20.9% of GDP, 1.46 score (higher = more independent)Australia: 27.6% of GDP, 2.62 score (higher = more independent)Austria: 46% of GDP, 2.73 score (higher = more independent)Azerbaijan: 23% of GDP, -0.517 score (higher = more independent)Burundi: 12.3% of GDP, -0.573 score (higher = more independent)Belgium: 39.7% of GDP, 2.85 score (higher = more independent)Burkina Faso: 19.6% of GDP, 1.03 score (higher = more independent)Bangladesh: 8.32% of GDP, 0.499 score (higher = more independent)Bulgaria: 35.8% of GDP, 1.59 score (higher = more independent)Bahrain: 26.1% of GDP, -1.25 score (higher = more independent)Bosnia and Herzegovina: 35.3% of GDP, 0.781 score (higher = more independent)Belarus: 28.5% of GDP, -1.6 score (higher = more independent)Brazil: 32.4% of GDP, 2.58 score (higher = more independent)Barbados: 28.8% of GDP, 2.44 score (higher = more independent)Bhutan: 24.1% of GDP, 1.31 score (higher = more independent)Botswana: 26.5% of GDP, 1.66 score (higher = more independent)Central African Republic: 11.7% of GDP, 0.683 score (higher = more independent)Canada: 19.1% of GDP, 2.51 score (higher = more independent)Switzerland: 16.1% of GDP, 2.72 score (higher = more independent)Chile: 24.6% of GDP, 3.13 score (higher = more independent)Cote d'Ivoire: 17.9% of GDP, 1.24 score (higher = more independent)Cameroon: 12.4% of GDP, -0.371 score (higher = more independent)Congo, Dem. Rep.: 12.4% of GDP, 0.573 score (higher = more independent)Congo, Rep.: 16.1% of GDP, 0.508 score (higher = more independent)Colombia: 33.3% of GDP, 2.26 score (higher = more independent)Cabo Verde: 30.9% of GDP, 2.53 score (higher = more independent)Costa Rica: 28.6% of GDP, 1.98 score (higher = more independent)Cyprus: 38.5% of GDP, 2.54 score (higher = more independent)Czechia: 34.4% of GDP, 2.43 score (higher = more independent)Germany: 31.2% of GDP, 2.66 score (higher = more independent)Denmark: 33.3% of GDP, 2.83 score (higher = more independent)Dominican Republic: 18.1% of GDP, 1.51 score (higher = more independent)Ecuador: 30.4% of GDP, 1.73 score (higher = more independent)Egypt, Arab Rep.: 30.2% of GDP, -0.965 score (higher = more independent)Spain: 34% of GDP, 2.74 score (higher = more independent)Estonia: 37.7% of GDP, 2.71 score (higher = more independent)Ethiopia: 6.12% of GDP, -0.535 score (higher = more independent)Finland: 44.9% of GDP, 2.65 score (higher = more independent)Fiji: 27.8% of GDP, 1.7 score (higher = more independent)France: 47.3% of GDP, 2.59 score (higher = more independent)Gabon: 14.1% of GDP, 0.682 score (higher = more independent)United Kingdom: 41.2% of GDP, 2.26 score (higher = more independent)Georgia: 25.2% of GDP, 1.28 score (higher = more independent)Ghana: 22.7% of GDP, 2.04 score (higher = more independent)Guinea-Bissau: 15.5% of GDP, 0.862 score (higher = more independent)Equatorial Guinea: 11% of GDP, -0.253 score (higher = more independent)Greece: 47.3% of GDP, 2.08 score (higher = more independent)Guatemala: 13.5% of GDP, 2.17 score (higher = more independent)Honduras: 24.4% of GDP, 2.1 score (higher = more independent)Croatia: 38.1% of GDP, 1.5 score (higher = more independent)Hungary: 42.4% of GDP, 0.224 score (higher = more independent)India: 13.7% of GDP, 1.58 score (higher = more independent)Ireland: 19.2% of GDP, 3.01 score (higher = more independent)Iraq: 27.6% of GDP, 0.313 score (higher = more independent)Iceland: 32% of GDP, 2.43 score (higher = more independent)Israel: 37.3% of GDP, 2.35 score (higher = more independent)Italy: 47.3% of GDP, 2.73 score (higher = more independent)Jamaica: 27.5% of GDP, 2 score (higher = more independent)Jordan: 25.9% of GDP, 0.662 score (higher = more independent)Japan: 20.1% of GDP, 1.92 score (higher = more independent)Kazakhstan: 17.4% of GDP, -0.551 score (higher = more independent)Kenya: 27.8% of GDP, 1.39 score (higher = more independent)Kyrgyz Republic: 23.7% of GDP, -0.721 score (higher = more independent)Cambodia: 12.9% of GDP, -0.704 score (higher = more independent)Korea, Rep.: 28.3% of GDP, 2.76 score (higher = more independent)Lao PDR: 10.3% of GDP, -2.8 score (higher = more independent)Lebanon: 6.3% of GDP, 0.53 score (higher = more independent)Sri Lanka: 18% of GDP, 1.84 score (higher = more independent)Lesotho: 40.2% of GDP, 1.97 score (higher = more independent)Lithuania: 33.9% of GDP, 2.13 score (higher = more independent)Luxembourg: 42.2% of GDP, 2.33 score (higher = more independent)Latvia: 34.2% of GDP, 2.84 score (higher = more independent)Morocco: 26.6% of GDP, 0.63 score (higher = more independent)Moldova: 34.5% of GDP, 2.43 score (higher = more independent)Madagascar: 11% of GDP, 1.98 score (higher = more independent)Maldives: 29.5% of GDP, 1.85 score (higher = more independent)Mexico: 22.5% of GDP, 0.679 score (higher = more independent)North Macedonia: 33.4% of GDP, 1.03 score (higher = more independent)Mali: 12.2% of GDP, 1.33 score (higher = more independent)Malta: 33.7% of GDP, 2.64 score (higher = more independent)Myanmar: 13.8% of GDP, -1.3 score (higher = more independent)Mongolia: 31.7% of GDP, 1.3 score (higher = more independent)Mozambique: 26% of GDP, 0.615 score (higher = more independent)Mauritius: 29.1% of GDP, 1.85 score (higher = more independent)Malawi: 20.2% of GDP, 1.27 score (higher = more independent)Malaysia: 17% of GDP, 1.76 score (higher = more independent)Namibia: 36.2% of GDP, 2.53 score (higher = more independent)Nicaragua: 16.3% of GDP, -1.89 score (higher = more independent)Netherlands: 40% of GDP, 2.86 score (higher = more independent)Norway: 34.5% of GDP, 2.19 score (higher = more independent)Nepal: 19.4% of GDP, 2.55 score (higher = more independent)New Zealand: 35.5% of GDP, 2.77 score (higher = more independent)Panama: 17.1% of GDP, 1.83 score (higher = more independent)Peru: 22.8% of GDP, 1.6 score (higher = more independent)Philippines: 16.9% of GDP, 0.797 score (higher = more independent)Papua New Guinea: 20.3% of GDP, 2.01 score (higher = more independent)Poland: 39.1% of GDP, 1.93 score (higher = more independent)Portugal: 37.2% of GDP, 1.72 score (higher = more independent)Paraguay: 18.9% of GDP, 1.43 score (higher = more independent)West Bank and Gaza: 26.2% of GDP, 0.231 score (higher = more independent)Romania: 37.3% of GDP, 1.96 score (higher = more independent)Russian Federation: 30% of GDP, -1.45 score (higher = more independent)Rwanda: 18% of GDP, -1.38 score (higher = more independent)Saudi Arabia: 24.2% of GDP, -2.61 score (higher = more independent)Sudan: 9.73% of GDP, 0.09 score (higher = more independent)Senegal: 23.6% of GDP, 0.71 score (higher = more independent)Singapore: 17.1% of GDP, 1.89 score (higher = more independent)Solomon Islands: 28.9% of GDP, 1.91 score (higher = more independent)El Salvador: 27.9% of GDP, 1.29 score (higher = more independent)Somalia, Fed. Rep.: 6.35% of GDP, 0.418 score (higher = more independent)Serbia: 35.5% of GDP, 0.38 score (higher = more independent)Slovak Republic: 39.8% of GDP, 2.84 score (higher = more independent)Slovenia: 42.9% of GDP, 1.97 score (higher = more independent)Sweden: 32.5% of GDP, 2.77 score (higher = more independent)Eswatini: 24.6% of GDP, -1.85 score (higher = more independent)Togo: 16% of GDP, 0.357 score (higher = more independent)Thailand: 20.7% of GDP, 1.45 score (higher = more independent)Tajikistan: 11% of GDP, -1.2 score (higher = more independent)Timor-Leste: 52.5% of GDP, 1.41 score (higher = more independent)Trinidad and Tobago: 33.3% of GDP, 1.94 score (higher = more independent)Tunisia: 33.8% of GDP, 1.11 score (higher = more independent)Turkiye: 33% of GDP, 0.86 score (higher = more independent)Tanzania: 16.3% of GDP, 1.1 score (higher = more independent)Uganda: 16.6% of GDP, 0.496 score (higher = more independent)Ukraine: 65.6% of GDP, 0.717 score (higher = more independent)Uruguay: 36.5% of GDP, 2.96 score (higher = more independent)United States: 24.4% of GDP, 2.31 score (higher = more independent)Uzbekistan: 22.3% of GDP, -1.46 score (higher = more independent)Vanuatu: 26.6% of GDP, 1.49 score (higher = more independent)South Africa: 33.4% of GDP, 0.912 score (higher = more independent)Zambia: 25.1% of GDP, 0.22 score (higher = more independent)Zimbabwe: 11% of GDP, -0.068 score (higher = more independent)AFGARECHEFRAIRLITALAOMDGNICSAUUKR

best-fit line line after adjusting

Four ways to measure the link

MethodrpCountries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted+0.4242.5e-7137
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted+0.5072.5e-10137
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income+0.2880.001137
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income+0.3170.000137

The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 137 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: +0.136 (a minus sign means it grew).

How solid is it?

Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from +0.228 (without ARE) to +0.345 (without AFG). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: ARE (-0.060).

Within each region

Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.

nr
East Asia & Pacific17+0.64
Europe & Central Asia46+0.29
Latin America & Caribbean19+0.44
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan13+0.31
Sub-Saharan Africa34+0.46

By income third

If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.

nr
Poorest third46+0.29
Middle third45+0.04
Richest third46+0.46

By largest religious group

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Christians90+0.21
Muslims29+0.02

By last European coloniser

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
France14+0.38
Never a European colony16-0.10
Spain18+0.49
United Kingdom40+0.46

By official ideology

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Nationalist20-0.05
No strong official ideology96+0.23

By party system

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
A few parties banned18+0.45
No parties banned107+0.25

Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = +0.292 after dropping 5 countries.

Two series, one country

Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.

Loading…

Over time, within countries

Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 35years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.

Within countries over time, there is no link that is clearly more than chance (r = -0.148, comparing each country only with itself over the years, and each year only with the same year elsewhere). Whatever the cross-country picture shows, countries whose government expense moved did not tend to see their independent opposition move with it.

Across countries (adjusted)+0.288for comparison
Within countries-0.151each country vs itself
…and vs the same year elsewhere-0.148q = 0.577 · 140 countries
Year-on-year changes+0.006q = 0.841
Read with care.
  • Almost all of this indicator's variation is between countries, not within them, so the within-country estimate rests on a small part of the data.

3,360 country-years (one country in one year), 140 countries, 1990–2024, about 24 years each on average. Share of the variation that happens within countries over time: 10% for Government expense, 61% for Independent opposition. The margins of error allow for each country appearing many times, and for each year’s value being close to the year before.

Year-to-year changes are a cautious test, not a final answer. Looking only at changes from one year to the next removes each country’s own trends. But it also makes measurement mistakes louder, which pulls the results toward zero. A near-zero result here is weak evidence of no link, not proof.

With one measure years behind the other

0.20−0.2-100+10years Independent opposition trails Government expense →lag -10: r = -0.001 (n = 2,608)lag -9: r = -0.068 (n = 2,694)lag -8: r = -0.110 (n = 2,778)lag -7: r = -0.137 (n = 2,855)lag -6: r = -0.140 (n = 2,932)lag -5: r = -0.155 (n = 3,011)lag -4: r = -0.168 (n = 3,086)lag -3: r = -0.161 (n = 3,157)lag -2: r = -0.154 (n = 3,227)lag -1: r = -0.149 (n = 3,295)lag +0: r = -0.148 (n = 3,360)lag +1: r = -0.117 (n = 3,361)lag +2: r = -0.086 (n = 3,360)lag +3: r = -0.092 (n = 3,278)lag +4: r = -0.098 (n = 3,176)lag +5: r = -0.102 (n = 3,057)lag +6: r = -0.061 (n = 2,938)lag +7: r = -0.023 (n = 2,808)lag +8: r = -0.024 (n = 2,672)lag +9: r = -0.019 (n = 2,545)lag +10: r = -0.019 (n = 2,422)

Same year (lag 0): -0.148. A peak away from zero does not show which comes first. These series change slowly — this year’s value is close to last year’s. That makes the curve smooth and nearly symmetric, whatever produced the data. Even a sharp peak at one lag (a gap of some years) would not prove that one measure changes the other.

The data


% of GDP

score (higher = more independent)
Years
Ukraine UKR65.6%0.7172023, 2025
Timor-Leste TLS52.5%1.412022, 2025
Greece GRC47.3%2.082023, 2025
Italy ITA47.3%2.732023, 2025
France FRA47.3%2.592023, 2025
Austria AUT46%2.732023, 2025
Finland FIN44.9%2.652023, 2025
Slovenia SVN42.9%1.972023, 2025
Hungary HUN42.4%0.2242022, 2025
Luxembourg LUX42.2%2.332023, 2025
United Kingdom GBR41.2%2.262023, 2025
Lesotho LSO40.2%1.972022, 2025
Netherlands NLD40%2.862023, 2025
Slovak Republic SVK39.8%2.842022, 2025
Belgium BEL39.7%2.852022, 2025

World Bank, World Development Indicators
Coppedge, M. et al., V-Dem Dataset v16, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project; Lindberg, S. I. et al., Varieties of Party Identity and Organization (V-Party) Dataset. Read from the V-Dem Institute's vdemdata package.

Sources

Government expense

Government expense (% of GDP)

World Bank · CC BY 4.0 · updated quarterly

Total central government spending, as a share of GDP: buying, payments to people, subsidies and interest together. From the IMF's Government Finance Statistics. It is the fuller measure of government size, but it covers fewer countries. It counts central government only, so a country with large state and local budgets looks low. About forty fewer countries report it than report government consumption. No "better" direction is set.

Independent opposition

Opposition parties' independence from the ruling regime

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · updated annual (V-Dem); V-Party per election, to 2019

Are opposition parties really independent, or picked or bought by the people in power? Experts answer from 0 ("opposition parties are not allowed") to 4 ("all opposition parties are independent"). V-Dem turns the answers into a score of about -4 to +4. A part of V-Dem's freedom of association index.

How this was computed

Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2012–2025. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 17,292 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated V-Dem v16; V-Party v2. How the country data works · explore Government expense and Independent opposition

This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that Government expense changes Independent opposition, or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.

More links with Government expense or Independent opposition