placestats

Civil liberties (FH) vs. Economy free of state ownership

Holds up after adjusting for income

Across 168 countries, Civil liberties (FH) and Economy free of state ownership rise and fall together at r = -0.64 (on a scale from −1 to +1, where 0 means no link). It holds up almost unchanged when only countries with similar income (GDP per person) are compared (r = -0.66, q = 0.0070, allowing for the many pairs tested).

Comparing countries across the middle half of civil liberties (FH), 2 to 5 points, economy free of state ownership is 1.05 points lower at the top of that range than the bottom. Comparing only countries with similar national income, the gap is 1.23 points.

Link before adjusting (r)-0.644p = 4.8e-21 · 168 countries
After adjusting for national income-0.657p = 5.4e-22 · likely range [-0.74, -0.56]
p, allowing for regions0.000standard error 0.079 · 7 regions
Check for luck (q)0.007across 17,292 pairs

How to read these.r runs from −1 (one goes up as the other goes down) to +1 (they rise together), and 0 means no link. Adjusting for national income means comparing countries with the same GDP per person, so differences in wealth can’t explain the link. Income is used in percentage terms, since an extra $1,000 means more to a poor country than to a rich one. p is how likely a link this strong would be if there were really none. Below 0.05 means it is unlikely to be chance. Very small values are written in short form: 1.1e-32 means a decimal point followed by 31 zeros and then 11, so very close to zero. The likely range is where the true figure probably lies, and a range that crosses zero means the link could easily be chance. Countries in the same region tend to resemble each other, so the third figure allows for that, which gives a fairer p. The standard error is the typical size of the error in r. Finally, testing this many pairs means some will look strong by luck alone. A q below 0.05 means this link is unlikely to be one of those.

Civil liberties (FH) · rating (1-7, 1 = most free)link with income -0.49 · moderate
Economy free of state ownership · score (higher = less state-owned)link with income +0.21 · independent

“Link with income” is how closely each measure tracks GDP per person across countries, from −1 to +1.

Every country as a dot

Civil liberties (FH) · rating (1-7, 1 = most free) →Economy free of state ownership · score (higher = less state-owned) →17-2.322.98Afghanistan: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -2.32 score (higher = less state-owned)Angola: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.661 score (higher = less state-owned)Albania: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.51 score (higher = less state-owned)United Arab Emirates: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.838 score (higher = less state-owned)Argentina: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.21 score (higher = less state-owned)Armenia: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.43 score (higher = less state-owned)Australia: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.44 score (higher = less state-owned)Austria: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.479 score (higher = less state-owned)Azerbaijan: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.24 score (higher = less state-owned)Burundi: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.381 score (higher = less state-owned)Belgium: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 2.08 score (higher = less state-owned)Benin: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.81 score (higher = less state-owned)Burkina Faso: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.307 score (higher = less state-owned)Bangladesh: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.741 score (higher = less state-owned)Bulgaria: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.71 score (higher = less state-owned)Bahrain: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.806 score (higher = less state-owned)Bosnia and Herzegovina: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.723 score (higher = less state-owned)Belarus: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.42 score (higher = less state-owned)Bolivia: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.027 score (higher = less state-owned)Brazil: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.18 score (higher = less state-owned)Barbados: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.63 score (higher = less state-owned)Bhutan: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.469 score (higher = less state-owned)Botswana: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.05 score (higher = less state-owned)Central African Republic: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.61 score (higher = less state-owned)Canada: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.867 score (higher = less state-owned)Switzerland: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 2.22 score (higher = less state-owned)Chile: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.76 score (higher = less state-owned)China: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.13 score (higher = less state-owned)Cote d'Ivoire: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.791 score (higher = less state-owned)Cameroon: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.671 score (higher = less state-owned)Congo, Dem. Rep.: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.181 score (higher = less state-owned)Congo, Rep.: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.37 score (higher = less state-owned)Colombia: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.23 score (higher = less state-owned)Comoros: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.592 score (higher = less state-owned)Cabo Verde: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.34 score (higher = less state-owned)Costa Rica: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.16 score (higher = less state-owned)Cyprus: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.85 score (higher = less state-owned)Czechia: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.91 score (higher = less state-owned)Germany: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.96 score (higher = less state-owned)Djibouti: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.527 score (higher = less state-owned)Denmark: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.36 score (higher = less state-owned)Dominican Republic: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.12 score (higher = less state-owned)Algeria: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.9 score (higher = less state-owned)Ecuador: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.745 score (higher = less state-owned)Egypt, Arab Rep.: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.14 score (higher = less state-owned)Spain: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.43 score (higher = less state-owned)Estonia: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.5 score (higher = less state-owned)Ethiopia: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.625 score (higher = less state-owned)Finland: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.08 score (higher = less state-owned)Fiji: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.05 score (higher = less state-owned)France: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.05 score (higher = less state-owned)Gabon: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.032 score (higher = less state-owned)United Kingdom: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.47 score (higher = less state-owned)Georgia: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.884 score (higher = less state-owned)Ghana: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.51 score (higher = less state-owned)Guinea: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.717 score (higher = less state-owned)Gambia, The: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.05 score (higher = less state-owned)Guinea-Bissau: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.594 score (higher = less state-owned)Equatorial Guinea: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.45 score (higher = less state-owned)Greece: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.01 score (higher = less state-owned)Guatemala: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 2.12 score (higher = less state-owned)Guyana: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.045 score (higher = less state-owned)Hong Kong SAR, China: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.874 score (higher = less state-owned)Honduras: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.854 score (higher = less state-owned)Croatia: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.02 score (higher = less state-owned)Haiti: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.54 score (higher = less state-owned)Hungary: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.26 score (higher = less state-owned)Indonesia: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.268 score (higher = less state-owned)India: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.151 score (higher = less state-owned)Ireland: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.47 score (higher = less state-owned)Iran, Islamic Rep.: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.13 score (higher = less state-owned)Iraq: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.647 score (higher = less state-owned)Iceland: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.131 score (higher = less state-owned)Israel: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.23 score (higher = less state-owned)Italy: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.37 score (higher = less state-owned)Jamaica: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.309 score (higher = less state-owned)Jordan: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.43 score (higher = less state-owned)Japan: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 2.98 score (higher = less state-owned)Kazakhstan: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.272 score (higher = less state-owned)Kenya: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.27 score (higher = less state-owned)Kyrgyz Republic: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.46 score (higher = less state-owned)Cambodia: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.35 score (higher = less state-owned)Korea, Rep.: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.07 score (higher = less state-owned)Kuwait: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.164 score (higher = less state-owned)Lao PDR: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.13 score (higher = less state-owned)Lebanon: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.15 score (higher = less state-owned)Liberia: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.754 score (higher = less state-owned)Libya: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.698 score (higher = less state-owned)Sri Lanka: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.728 score (higher = less state-owned)Lesotho: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.23 score (higher = less state-owned)Lithuania: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 2.08 score (higher = less state-owned)Luxembourg: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 2.12 score (higher = less state-owned)Latvia: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 2.17 score (higher = less state-owned)Morocco: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.666 score (higher = less state-owned)Moldova: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.971 score (higher = less state-owned)Madagascar: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.974 score (higher = less state-owned)Maldives: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.23 score (higher = less state-owned)Mexico: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.8 score (higher = less state-owned)North Macedonia: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.32 score (higher = less state-owned)Mali: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.35 score (higher = less state-owned)Malta: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.654 score (higher = less state-owned)Myanmar: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.23 score (higher = less state-owned)Montenegro: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.43 score (higher = less state-owned)Mongolia: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.495 score (higher = less state-owned)Mozambique: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.076 score (higher = less state-owned)Mauritania: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.557 score (higher = less state-owned)Mauritius: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.759 score (higher = less state-owned)Malawi: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.18 score (higher = less state-owned)Malaysia: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.536 score (higher = less state-owned)Namibia: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.078 score (higher = less state-owned)Niger: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.502 score (higher = less state-owned)Nigeria: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.36 score (higher = less state-owned)Nicaragua: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.059 score (higher = less state-owned)Netherlands: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.37 score (higher = less state-owned)Norway: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.63 score (higher = less state-owned)Nepal: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.974 score (higher = less state-owned)New Zealand: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.417 score (higher = less state-owned)Oman: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.466 score (higher = less state-owned)Pakistan: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.417 score (higher = less state-owned)Panama: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.15 score (higher = less state-owned)Peru: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 2.21 score (higher = less state-owned)Philippines: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.45 score (higher = less state-owned)Papua New Guinea: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.19 score (higher = less state-owned)Poland: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.03 score (higher = less state-owned)Portugal: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.22 score (higher = less state-owned)Paraguay: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.64 score (higher = less state-owned)Qatar: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.47 score (higher = less state-owned)Romania: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.887 score (higher = less state-owned)Russian Federation: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.936 score (higher = less state-owned)Rwanda: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.57 score (higher = less state-owned)Saudi Arabia: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.62 score (higher = less state-owned)Sudan: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.01 score (higher = less state-owned)Senegal: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.091 score (higher = less state-owned)Singapore: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.327 score (higher = less state-owned)Solomon Islands: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.8 score (higher = less state-owned)Sierra Leone: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.11 score (higher = less state-owned)El Salvador: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.114 score (higher = less state-owned)Somalia, Fed. Rep.: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.81 score (higher = less state-owned)Serbia: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.05 score (higher = less state-owned)Sao Tome and Principe: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.51 score (higher = less state-owned)Suriname: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.176 score (higher = less state-owned)Slovak Republic: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.6 score (higher = less state-owned)Slovenia: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.655 score (higher = less state-owned)Sweden: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.37 score (higher = less state-owned)Eswatini: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.829 score (higher = less state-owned)Seychelles: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.291 score (higher = less state-owned)Syrian Arab Republic: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.277 score (higher = less state-owned)Chad: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.974 score (higher = less state-owned)Togo: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.379 score (higher = less state-owned)Thailand: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.776 score (higher = less state-owned)Tajikistan: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -2.03 score (higher = less state-owned)Turkmenistan: 7 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -1.9 score (higher = less state-owned)Timor-Leste: 3 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.204 score (higher = less state-owned)Trinidad and Tobago: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.464 score (higher = less state-owned)Tunisia: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.049 score (higher = less state-owned)Turkiye: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.934 score (higher = less state-owned)Tanzania: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.455 score (higher = less state-owned)Uganda: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.39 score (higher = less state-owned)Ukraine: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.32 score (higher = less state-owned)Uruguay: 1 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.15 score (higher = less state-owned)United States: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.75 score (higher = less state-owned)Uzbekistan: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.956 score (higher = less state-owned)Viet Nam: 6 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.387 score (higher = less state-owned)Vanuatu: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.615 score (higher = less state-owned)Kosovo: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 0.93 score (higher = less state-owned)South Africa: 2 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.33 score (higher = less state-owned)Zambia: 4 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), 1.33 score (higher = less state-owned)Zimbabwe: 5 rating (1-7, 1 = most free), -0.957 score (higher = less state-owned)AFGCAFCHEDZAGTMISLJPNLUXSOMSYCTJKTKM

best-fit line line after adjusting

Four ways to measure the link

MethodrpCountries
Standard (Pearson), not adjusted-0.6444.8e-21168
By rank (Spearman), not adjusted-0.5991.0e-17168
Standard (Pearson), adjusted for national income-0.6575.4e-22168
By rank (Spearman), adjusted for national income-0.5851.0e-16168

The rank version uses only each country’s place in line, from lowest to highest, so a few extreme countries count for less. The adjusted and unadjusted versions use the same 168 countries: those that report both measures and GDP per person. So the gap between them comes from the adjustment, not from a change in which countries are counted. Drop in the size of r after adjusting: -0.013 (a minus sign means it grew).

How solid is it?

Leaving out one country at a time, r ranges from -0.673 (without SOM) to -0.645 (without TKM). The bar above shows that range on a scale from −1 to +1, with the solid line at the full result. The single country that moves r most: SOM (-0.016).

Within each region

Countries are not separate, unrelated cases, and neighbors share a lot. A link that holds inside each region is far more believable than one that shows up only when comparing regions.

nr
East Asia & Pacific21-0.66
Europe & Central Asia49-0.65
Latin America & Caribbean23-0.16
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan21-0.66
Sub-Saharan Africa46-0.54

By income third

If the link shows up only in the richest third of countries, it is a feature of rich countries, not a general pattern.

nr
Poorest third56-0.49
Middle third56-0.70
Richest third56-0.73

By largest religious group

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Christians99-0.51
Muslims48-0.59

By last European coloniser

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
France25-0.32
Never a European colony21-0.84
Spain19-0.58
United Kingdom49-0.61

By official ideology

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
Nationalist25-0.69
No strong official ideology116-0.43

By party system

Countries grouped by a label they share, such as main religion, rather than by a number. Groups of fewer than twelve countries are not shown. These groups differ in income, region and history all at once. So a gap between them is a place to start asking questions, not an answer.

nr
A few parties banned26-0.67
No parties banned121-0.32

Without outliers (countries far outside the middle half of countries on either measure, by more than one and a half times the width of that middle half): r = -0.656 after dropping 1 countries.

Two series, one country

Both measures over the years for one country you pick. The two charts are stacked so they share only the years along the bottom.

Loading…

Over time, within countries

Everything above compares countries with each other at one moment. This section compares each country only with itself over 36years. So a link here can’t come from anything about a country that stays the same, such as its history, geography, institutions or culture.

The link also shows up within countries over time (r = -0.247). It holds even when looking only at changes from one year to the next (r = -0.096). This is the strongest kind of evidence available here: it holds when each country is compared only with itself, and it is not just a product of shared trends.

Across countries (adjusted)-0.657for comparison
Within countries-0.309each country vs itself
…and vs the same year elsewhere-0.247q = 3.0e-5 · 176 countries
Year-on-year changes-0.096q = 0.006

6,249 country-years (one country in one year), 176 countries, 1990–2025, about 36 years each on average. Share of the variation that happens within countries over time: 11% for Civil liberties (FH), 15% for Economy free of state ownership. The margins of error allow for each country appearing many times, and for each year’s value being close to the year before.

Year-to-year changes are a cautious test, not a final answer. Looking only at changes from one year to the next removes each country’s own trends. But it also makes measurement mistakes louder, which pulls the results toward zero. A near-zero result here is weak evidence of no link, not proof.

With one measure years behind the other

0.30−0.3-100+10years Economy free of state ownership trails Civil liberties (FH) →lag -10: r = -0.124 (n = 4,505)lag -9: r = -0.143 (n = 4,680)lag -8: r = -0.155 (n = 4,854)lag -7: r = -0.159 (n = 5,028)lag -6: r = -0.166 (n = 5,202)lag -5: r = -0.171 (n = 5,376)lag -4: r = -0.170 (n = 5,550)lag -3: r = -0.185 (n = 5,724)lag -2: r = -0.196 (n = 5,897)lag -1: r = -0.220 (n = 6,075)lag +0: r = -0.247 (n = 6,249)lag +1: r = -0.237 (n = 6,080)lag +2: r = -0.226 (n = 5,909)lag +3: r = -0.198 (n = 5,737)lag +4: r = -0.168 (n = 5,564)lag +5: r = -0.142 (n = 5,391)lag +6: r = -0.118 (n = 5,218)lag +7: r = -0.092 (n = 5,045)lag +8: r = -0.062 (n = 4,872)lag +9: r = -0.027 (n = 4,698)lag +10: r = 0.008 (n = 4,523)

Same year (lag 0): -0.247. A peak away from zero does not show which comes first. These series change slowly — this year’s value is close to last year’s. That makes the curve smooth and nearly symmetric, whatever produced the data. Even a sharp peak at one lag (a gap of some years) would not prove that one measure changes the other.

The data


rating (1-7, 1 = most free)

score (higher = less state-owned)
Years
Turkmenistan TKM7-1.92025
Tajikistan TJK7-2.032025
Somalia, Fed. Rep. SOM71.812025
Sudan SDN7-1.012025
Myanmar MMR7-1.232025
Iran, Islamic Rep. IRN7-1.132025
Equatorial Guinea GNQ7-1.452025
Central African Republic CAF71.612025
Belarus BLR7-1.422025
Azerbaijan AZE7-1.242025
Afghanistan AFG7-2.322025
Viet Nam VNM6-0.3872025
Uzbekistan UZB6-0.9562025
Turkiye TUR60.9342025
Chad TCD60.9742025

Freedom House, Freedom in the World
Coppedge, M. et al., V-Dem Dataset v16, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project; Lindberg, S. I. et al., Varieties of Party Identity and Organization (V-Party) Dataset. Read from the V-Dem Institute's vdemdata package.

Sources

Civil liberties (FH)

Civil liberties rating

Freedom House · via Our World in Data · Free to use with attribution · updated annual

Scored 1 to 7, where 1 is most free. Covers freedom of speech and belief, the right to form groups, the rule of law and personal freedom. The same expert review process produces the political rights rating, so the two are bound to match closely.

Economy free of state ownership

State ownership of the economy (higher = less owned by the state)

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · updated annual (V-Dem); V-Party per election, to 2019

Does the state own or directly control the important parts of the economy? Experts answer from 0 ("virtually all valuable capital belongs to the state") to 4 ("very little valuable capital belongs to the state"), and V-Dem turns their answers into a score that runs from about -4 to +4. So a low score means a mostly state-run economy, as in North Korea or Eritrea, and a high score a mostly private one. It is about ownership and control, not taxes or welfare: a country can tax and spend a great deal while the state owns almost nothing. Today it lines up only weakly with how rich a country is. Oil states such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait are rich while the state owns much of the economy, and some of the poorest countries, such as Somalia, Haiti and the Central African Republic, have little state ownership. The link with income was stronger in the 1960s and has weakened every decade since. Within Europe and Central Asia, where former communist countries sold off state firms, it is still strong. No "better" direction is set: how much the state should own is a political question.

How this was computed

Data used: most recent value in 2010-2025; values come from 2025. To adjust for income, each measure is first predicted from GDP per person (in percentage terms, on a log scale) with a straight-line fit. Only what is left over is then compared. This is called a partial correlation. The line is drawn the standard way (ordinary least squares), which picks the line that comes closest to all the countries at once. The error margins allow for countries in the same region resembling each other, using 7 World Bank regions. The q-value corrects for testing all 17,292 pairs at once, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Underlying data last updated V-Dem v16; V-Party v2. How the country data works · explore Civil liberties (FH) and Economy free of state ownership

This page shows that two measures go together. It does not show that Civil liberties (FH) changes Economy free of state ownership, or the reverse. These figures also describe countries, not individual people. See the ecological fallacy.

More links with Civil liberties (FH) or Economy free of state ownership